Comparing the effectiveness of reality therapy and the approach of interactional behavior analysis on character strength in infertile women

R. Zahedi, Mina Mojtabaie, Amin Rafieipour
{"title":"Comparing the effectiveness of reality therapy and the approach of interactional behavior analysis on character strength in infertile women","authors":"R. Zahedi, Mina Mojtabaie, Amin Rafieipour","doi":"10.52547/iau.31.4.432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infertility is one of the most common problems of women that always has negative psychological consequences for infertile women. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effectiveness of reality therapy and interaction behavior analysis approach on character strength in infertile women. Materials and methods: The present study was a quasi-experimental study with a pretest and posttest design with a control and follow-up group of 45 days. The research population was infertile women who referred to Ibn Sina Infertility Clinic in Tehran in 2018. 45 people were randomly assigned to 3 groups (each 15 people). Experimental groups were trained in 10 sessions of 90 minutes with reality therapy methods and interaction behavior analysis approach and the control group was not trained. Data with demographic information form and competency questionnaire behavior (VIA-IS) was analyzed by chi-square, multivariate analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test in SPSS software version 22. Results: The results showed that there was a significant difference between the effectiveness of reality therapy and interaction behavior analysis on character strength in infertile women (P <0.05); in other words, reality therapy had a greater effect on character strength in infertile women than interaction behavior analysis (P <0.05). Conclusion: Considering the effectiveness of reality therapy on the character strength of infertile women, it is necessary to pay attention to this approach in order to accept the problem of infertility and reduce its consequences in infertile women, along with medical treatments.","PeriodicalId":18492,"journal":{"name":"MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MEDICAL SCIENCES JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/iau.31.4.432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infertility is one of the most common problems of women that always has negative psychological consequences for infertile women. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effectiveness of reality therapy and interaction behavior analysis approach on character strength in infertile women. Materials and methods: The present study was a quasi-experimental study with a pretest and posttest design with a control and follow-up group of 45 days. The research population was infertile women who referred to Ibn Sina Infertility Clinic in Tehran in 2018. 45 people were randomly assigned to 3 groups (each 15 people). Experimental groups were trained in 10 sessions of 90 minutes with reality therapy methods and interaction behavior analysis approach and the control group was not trained. Data with demographic information form and competency questionnaire behavior (VIA-IS) was analyzed by chi-square, multivariate analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc test in SPSS software version 22. Results: The results showed that there was a significant difference between the effectiveness of reality therapy and interaction behavior analysis on character strength in infertile women (P <0.05); in other words, reality therapy had a greater effect on character strength in infertile women than interaction behavior analysis (P <0.05). Conclusion: Considering the effectiveness of reality therapy on the character strength of infertile women, it is necessary to pay attention to this approach in order to accept the problem of infertility and reduce its consequences in infertile women, along with medical treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现实疗法与互动行为分析方法对不孕症妇女性格力量的影响比较
背景:不孕不育是女性最常见的问题之一,总是对不孕妇女产生负面的心理后果。因此,本研究的目的是探讨和比较现实治疗和互动行为分析方法对不孕症妇女性格力量的有效性。材料与方法:本研究为准实验研究,采用前测和后测设计,对照组和随访组为45天。研究人群是2018年到德黑兰伊本·西纳不孕不育诊所就诊的不孕妇女。45人被随机分为3组(每组15人)。实验组采用现实治疗方法和互动行为分析方法进行10次90分钟的训练,对照组不进行训练。统计信息表和胜任力问卷行为(VIA-IS)数据在SPSS软件22版中采用卡方、多变量方差分析和Bonferroni事后检验分析。结果:现实治疗与互动行为分析对不孕症妇女性格强度的影响差异有统计学意义(P <0.05);也就是说,现实治疗对不孕女性性格强度的影响大于互动行为分析(P <0.05)。结论:考虑到现实疗法对不孕症女性性格强度的影响,在医学治疗的同时,必须重视现实疗法,以接受不孕症问题,减少不孕症的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational analysis, design and expression of hybrid antibody in Single Chain Fragment Variable (scFv) form for identifying surface antigen factor H binding protein (fHbp) of Neisseria meningitidis The effect of laughter therapy on the fatigue and anxiety of mothers of children admitted to the psychiatric departments of Tehran Hospitals: an experimental study Toxicity assessment of high fructose corn syrup-55: a repeated dose oral toxicity study in uterus and ovaries of female rats Molecular detection of human parechovirus by real-time PCR in cerebrospinal fluid samples of pediatric patients with meningitis and meningoencephalitis Study and comparison of growth and development of the first year of life in preterm and term infants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1