Level of Safety and Crossing Warrants for Crosswalks Using Surrogate Safety Measures

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI:10.1680/jtran.21.00092
Sheela Alex, Padmakumar Radhakrishnan, Sanjana N
{"title":"Level of Safety and Crossing Warrants for Crosswalks Using Surrogate Safety Measures","authors":"Sheela Alex, Padmakumar Radhakrishnan, Sanjana N","doi":"10.1680/jtran.21.00092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pedestrians are the most vulnerable road users and they are highly susceptible to conflicts at midblock crosswalk locations. They are prone to a higher risk of injury on the incident of vehicular impact and their decision making behaviour at unmarked crosswalks are more crucial than at marked crosswalks. The objective of the current study is to determine the Level of Safety thresholds and warrants for both marked and unmarked pedestrian crossing facilities at urban midblock sections under mixed traffic conditions. In this study, data were collected from four different locations of Trivandrum city including marked and unmarked crosswalks. Crossing behaviour of pedestrians for both types of crosswalks were compared by analyzing different characteristics such as gap acceptance, surrogate safety measure like post encroachment time (PET), waiting time, crossing time, platoon size, type of critical vehicle and critical gap. Multiple linear regression (MLR) technique was used to develop gap acceptance models. The study also proposes Pedestrian Level of Safety (PLS) criteria which describes the safety of pedestrians at crosswalks and warrants for crossings based on the PET values. The developed PLS thresholds and the pedestrian vehicle interaction values (PV2) were correlated to the PET values to develop the pedestrian crossing warrants.","PeriodicalId":49670,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.21.00092","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pedestrians are the most vulnerable road users and they are highly susceptible to conflicts at midblock crosswalk locations. They are prone to a higher risk of injury on the incident of vehicular impact and their decision making behaviour at unmarked crosswalks are more crucial than at marked crosswalks. The objective of the current study is to determine the Level of Safety thresholds and warrants for both marked and unmarked pedestrian crossing facilities at urban midblock sections under mixed traffic conditions. In this study, data were collected from four different locations of Trivandrum city including marked and unmarked crosswalks. Crossing behaviour of pedestrians for both types of crosswalks were compared by analyzing different characteristics such as gap acceptance, surrogate safety measure like post encroachment time (PET), waiting time, crossing time, platoon size, type of critical vehicle and critical gap. Multiple linear regression (MLR) technique was used to develop gap acceptance models. The study also proposes Pedestrian Level of Safety (PLS) criteria which describes the safety of pedestrians at crosswalks and warrants for crossings based on the PET values. The developed PLS thresholds and the pedestrian vehicle interaction values (PV2) were correlated to the PET values to develop the pedestrian crossing warrants.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用替代安全措施的人行横道的安全水平和穿越许可
行人是最脆弱的道路使用者,他们很容易在街区中间的人行横道发生冲突。他们在车辆碰撞事故中受伤的风险更高,他们在无标志人行横道上的决策行为比在有标志人行横道上的决策行为更重要。本研究的目的是在混合交通条件下,确定城市街区中间路段有标志和无标志行人过街设施的安全阈值和保证水平。在这项研究中,收集了特里凡得琅市四个不同地点的数据,包括有标记和无标记的人行横道。通过分析两种人行横道的间隙接受度、替代安全措施(如侵占后时间(PET))、等待时间、过马路时间、队列规模、关键车辆类型和关键间隙等特征,比较两种人行横道行人的过马路行为。采用多元线性回归(MLR)技术建立了间隙接受模型。该研究还提出了行人安全水平(PLS)标准,该标准描述了人行横道上行人的安全性,并根据PET值提出了人行横道的保证。提出的PLS阈值和行人与车辆相互作用值(PV2)与PET值相关联,以制定行人过街证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Transport is essential reading for those needing information on civil engineering developments across all areas of transport. This journal covers all aspects of planning, design, construction, maintenance and project management for the movement of goods and people. Specific topics covered include: transport planning and policy, construction of infrastructure projects, traffic management, airports and highway pavement maintenance and performance and the economic and environmental aspects of urban and inter-urban transportation systems.
期刊最新文献
Traffic crash prediction model in Kano State, Nigeria: a multivariate LSTM approach Pandemic insights: analyzing public transport with logit models Impact of COVID-19 restriction measures on transport sector in Sub-Saharan Africa: insights from Douala City, Cameroon Intersection optimization study based on traffic conditions in the physical area of intersections Harvesting electricity from road traffic noise energy – a literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1