Amoxicillin vs Levofloxacin in Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis: Review

Samara M. Ali, S. M. Zeiny
{"title":"Amoxicillin vs Levofloxacin in Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis: Review","authors":"Samara M. Ali, S. M. Zeiny","doi":"10.26477/idj.v38i1.65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antibiotics Resistance can be the main problem faced by the specialists in the medical fields. The main reason of such resistance is the improper prescribing of antibiotics. In dentistry this problem must be in concern for 2 reasons, first, limited and outdated knowledge of many dentist in Iraq with recent modalities in the field of therapeutics, so they keep prescribing penicillins, for every odontogenic infection (rationale prescribing), second, the patient who keeps prescribing the same drug for himself every time (i.e. dealing with antibiotic as over-the-counter drug).  Aim of the study: This review will clarifies the use of amoxicillin (most prescribed drug in Iraqi dental clinics) vs the use of third generation quinolones (levofloxacin) in an important field of dental practice which is periodontology, with focusing on levofloxacin as it took a privileged position in medical researches.  Conclusion: levofloxacin was superior to amoxicillin since it is applied once daily, few nonhazardous side effects, nearly 100 % bioavailability in spite of different rout of administration, and can be applied topically as gels and intra- pocket films. Perhaps this can change a lot among practitioners’ and non- practitioners’ prescribing (habits).","PeriodicalId":78326,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Dental Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26477/idj.v38i1.65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antibiotics Resistance can be the main problem faced by the specialists in the medical fields. The main reason of such resistance is the improper prescribing of antibiotics. In dentistry this problem must be in concern for 2 reasons, first, limited and outdated knowledge of many dentist in Iraq with recent modalities in the field of therapeutics, so they keep prescribing penicillins, for every odontogenic infection (rationale prescribing), second, the patient who keeps prescribing the same drug for himself every time (i.e. dealing with antibiotic as over-the-counter drug).  Aim of the study: This review will clarifies the use of amoxicillin (most prescribed drug in Iraqi dental clinics) vs the use of third generation quinolones (levofloxacin) in an important field of dental practice which is periodontology, with focusing on levofloxacin as it took a privileged position in medical researches.  Conclusion: levofloxacin was superior to amoxicillin since it is applied once daily, few nonhazardous side effects, nearly 100 % bioavailability in spite of different rout of administration, and can be applied topically as gels and intra- pocket films. Perhaps this can change a lot among practitioners’ and non- practitioners’ prescribing (habits).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿莫西林与左氧氟沙星治疗慢性牙周炎:综述
背景:抗生素耐药性可能是医学领域专家面临的主要问题。这种耐药性的主要原因是抗生素的处方不当。在牙科方面,必须关注这个问题有两个原因:第一,伊拉克许多牙医在治疗领域的最新模式知识有限和过时,因此他们对每一种牙源性感染都开青霉素(理由处方),第二,病人每次都给自己开同样的药(即把抗生素当作非处方药处理)。研究目的:本综述将阐明阿莫西林(伊拉克牙科诊所最常用的处方药)与第三代喹诺酮类药物(左氧氟沙星)在牙周学这一牙科重要领域的使用情况,重点介绍左氧氟沙星在医学研究中的特殊地位。结论:左氧氟沙星优于阿莫西林,每日1次,无不良反应,不同给药方式生物利用度接近100%,可作为凝胶和囊内膜外用。也许这可以大大改变从业人员和非从业人员的处方(习惯)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE EFFECT OF AGING ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF PROVISIONAL CROWN AND BRIDGE MATERIAL PIEZOGRAPHIE IN THE SERVICE OF EDENTULOUS: CLINICAL CASE REPORT ASSESSMENT OF MENTAL FORAMEN POSITION IN DENTATE SUBJECTS INFLUENCE OF POST-OPERATIVE INSTRUCTIONS ON WOUND HEALING. A RANDOMIZED, SINGLE-BLINDED CLINICAL TRIAL. COMPARATIVE STUDY ON IMMEDIATE AND DELAYED EXTRACTION OF MANDIBULAR MOLARS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE DENTOALVEOLAR ABSCESS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1