Analysis of bi-directional ducted tidal turbine performance

Conor F. Fleming, Richard H.J. Willden
{"title":"Analysis of bi-directional ducted tidal turbine performance","authors":"Conor F. Fleming,&nbsp;Richard H.J. Willden","doi":"10.1016/j.ijome.2016.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Several commercial tidal turbine designs feature axial flow rotors within bi-directional ducts. Such devices are typically intended to increase power extraction through a flow-concentrating effect, operating on flood and ebb tides without a yawing mechanism. Research focused on such devices has been limited so far, with available results indicating poor performance relative to bare rotors. This study further investigates the relative performance of bi-directional ducted tidal turbines in confined flow.</p><p>Several duct profiles are evaluated relative to unducted rotors using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes solver ANSYS Fluent. The rotor is represented as an actuator disc, which mimics the streamwise thrust of a real device but does not reproduce its swirl or additional turbulence generation. This idealised model achieves optimal energy extraction and enables fair comparison of duct geometries. Device power is reported relative to total frontal area, reflecting the fact that the overall dimension of the device will be limited by water depth. Comparisons based on rotor area show how the absolute power is increased by a duct, but that this is attributable to an increase in blockage.</p><p>The fundamental effect of a duct on a rotor, as well as the secondary effects of duct camber and thickness, are identified by analysing streamwise distributions of velocity, pressure and cross-sectional area along the rotor streamtube. Ducts are found to limit the expansion of the downstream flow, in turn restricting the pressure reduction immediately behind the rotor. This effect, in combination with the reduced volumetric flux through a ducted rotor relative to a bare rotor, results in reduced power extraction.</p><p>The effects of duct curvature and thickness on turbine performance are also examined. Where a ducted rotor is desirable, e.g. for the protection of rotor blades, a thick profile with slight curvature performs best.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100705,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Marine Energy","volume":"16 ","pages":"Pages 162-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijome.2016.07.003","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Marine Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214166916300480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Several commercial tidal turbine designs feature axial flow rotors within bi-directional ducts. Such devices are typically intended to increase power extraction through a flow-concentrating effect, operating on flood and ebb tides without a yawing mechanism. Research focused on such devices has been limited so far, with available results indicating poor performance relative to bare rotors. This study further investigates the relative performance of bi-directional ducted tidal turbines in confined flow.

Several duct profiles are evaluated relative to unducted rotors using the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes solver ANSYS Fluent. The rotor is represented as an actuator disc, which mimics the streamwise thrust of a real device but does not reproduce its swirl or additional turbulence generation. This idealised model achieves optimal energy extraction and enables fair comparison of duct geometries. Device power is reported relative to total frontal area, reflecting the fact that the overall dimension of the device will be limited by water depth. Comparisons based on rotor area show how the absolute power is increased by a duct, but that this is attributable to an increase in blockage.

The fundamental effect of a duct on a rotor, as well as the secondary effects of duct camber and thickness, are identified by analysing streamwise distributions of velocity, pressure and cross-sectional area along the rotor streamtube. Ducts are found to limit the expansion of the downstream flow, in turn restricting the pressure reduction immediately behind the rotor. This effect, in combination with the reduced volumetric flux through a ducted rotor relative to a bare rotor, results in reduced power extraction.

The effects of duct curvature and thickness on turbine performance are also examined. Where a ducted rotor is desirable, e.g. for the protection of rotor blades, a thick profile with slight curvature performs best.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双向导管式潮汐水轮机性能分析
一些商业潮汐涡轮机的设计特点是双向管道内的轴流转子。这种装置通常是为了通过水流集中效应来增加电力提取,在涨潮和退潮时运行,而不需要偏航机制。到目前为止,对这种装置的研究还很有限,现有的结果表明,与裸转子相比,这种装置的性能较差。本文进一步研究了双向导管式潮汐涡轮机在受限流中的相对性能。使用reynolds -average Navier-Stokes求解器ANSYS Fluent,对几种管道剖面进行了相对于导流转子的评估。转子被表示为一个驱动器盘,它模拟了一个真实装置的流向推力,但不复制其漩涡或额外的湍流产生。这种理想化的模型实现了最佳的能量提取,并使管道几何形状的公平比较。设备功率报告相对于总额面积,反映了设备的整体尺寸将受到水深的限制。基于转子面积的比较显示了绝对功率是如何通过管道增加的,但这是由于堵塞的增加。通过分析沿转子流管的速度、压力和横截面积的流向分布,确定了风管对转子的基本影响,以及风管曲率和厚度的次要影响。人们发现管道限制了下游流动的膨胀,反过来又限制了转子后面的压力降低。这种效应,与通过导管转子相对于裸转子的体积通量减少相结合,导致功率提取减少。研究了风道曲率和厚度对涡轮性能的影响。当需要导管转子时,例如为了保护转子叶片,具有轻微曲率的厚型材表现最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Physical scale model testing of a flexible membrane wave energy converter: Videogrammetric analysis of membrane operation A comparison of control strategies for wave energy converters Predicted power performance of a submerged membrane pressure-differential wave energy converter Ocean power technology design optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1