TARGET VOLATILITY STRATEGIES FOR GROUP SELF-ANNUITY PORTFOLIOS

IF 1.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS ASTIN Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.1017/asb.2022.7
A. Olivieri, Samuel Thirurajah, Jonathan Ziveyi
{"title":"TARGET VOLATILITY STRATEGIES FOR GROUP SELF-ANNUITY PORTFOLIOS","authors":"A. Olivieri, Samuel Thirurajah, Jonathan Ziveyi","doi":"10.1017/asb.2022.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While the current pandemic is causing mortality shocks globally, the management of longevity risk remains a major challenge for both individuals and institutions. It is high time there be private market solutions designed for efficient longevity risk transfer among various stakeholders such as individuals, pension funds and annuity providers. From individuals’ point of view, appealing features of post-retirement solutions include stable and satisfactory benefit levels, flexibility, meeting bequest preferences and low fees. This paper proposes a dynamic target volatility strategy for group self-annuitization (GSA) schemes aimed at enhancing living benefits for pool participants. More specifically, we suggest investing GSA funds in a portfolio consisting of equity and cash, continuously rebalanced to maintain a target volatility level. The performance of a dynamic target volatility strategy is assessed against the static case which does not involve portfolio rebalancing. Benefit profiles are assessed by analysing quantiles and alternative strategies involving varying equity compositions. The case of death benefits is included, and the fund dynamics analysed by assessing resulting investment returns and the mortality credits. Overall, higher living benefit profiles are obtained under a dynamic target volatility strategy. From the analysis performed, a trade-off between the equity proportion and the impact on the lower quantile of the living benefit amount emerges, suggesting an optimal proportion of equity composition.","PeriodicalId":8617,"journal":{"name":"ASTIN Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASTIN Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2022.7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract While the current pandemic is causing mortality shocks globally, the management of longevity risk remains a major challenge for both individuals and institutions. It is high time there be private market solutions designed for efficient longevity risk transfer among various stakeholders such as individuals, pension funds and annuity providers. From individuals’ point of view, appealing features of post-retirement solutions include stable and satisfactory benefit levels, flexibility, meeting bequest preferences and low fees. This paper proposes a dynamic target volatility strategy for group self-annuitization (GSA) schemes aimed at enhancing living benefits for pool participants. More specifically, we suggest investing GSA funds in a portfolio consisting of equity and cash, continuously rebalanced to maintain a target volatility level. The performance of a dynamic target volatility strategy is assessed against the static case which does not involve portfolio rebalancing. Benefit profiles are assessed by analysing quantiles and alternative strategies involving varying equity compositions. The case of death benefits is included, and the fund dynamics analysed by assessing resulting investment returns and the mortality credits. Overall, higher living benefit profiles are obtained under a dynamic target volatility strategy. From the analysis performed, a trade-off between the equity proportion and the impact on the lower quantile of the living benefit amount emerges, suggesting an optimal proportion of equity composition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团体自我年金投资组合的目标波动率策略
虽然当前的大流行正在全球范围内造成死亡率冲击,但对个人和机构来说,长寿风险管理仍然是一项重大挑战。现在是时候出现私人市场解决方案了,以便在个人、养老基金和年金提供商等不同利益相关者之间有效地转移长寿风险。从个人的角度来看,退休后解决方案吸引人的特点包括稳定和令人满意的福利水平、灵活性、符合遗赠偏好和低费用。本文提出了一种动态目标波动率策略,以提高群体自年金化(GSA)计划参与者的生活福利。更具体地说,我们建议将GSA基金投资于由股票和现金组成的投资组合,不断重新平衡以保持目标波动水平。动态目标波动率策略的性能是在不涉及投资组合再平衡的静态情况下进行评估的。通过分析分位数和涉及不同股权构成的替代策略来评估收益概况。包括死亡抚恤金的情况,并通过评估由此产生的投资回报和死亡抵免来分析基金动态。总体而言,在动态目标波动策略下获得了更高的生活效益曲线。从所进行的分析来看,权益比例与对生活福利金额较低的分位数的影响之间出现了一种权衡,表明权益构成的最优比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASTIN Bulletin
ASTIN Bulletin 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
24
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ASTIN Bulletin publishes papers that are relevant to any branch of actuarial science and insurance mathematics. Its papers are quantitative and scientific in nature, and draw on theory and methods developed in any branch of the mathematical sciences including actuarial mathematics, statistics, probability, financial mathematics and econometrics.
期刊最新文献
A data science approach to climate change risk assessment applied to pluvial flood occurrences for the United States and Canada Calculating premium principles from the mode of a unimodal weighted distribution ASB volume 54 issue 2 Cover and Back matter ASB volume 54 issue 2 Cover and Front matter ASB volume 54 issue 1 Cover and Back matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1