Beta-blocker Use in Moderate and Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

F. Zvizdić, E. Begić, A. Mujaković, E. Hodžić, B. Prnjavorac, O. Bedak, F. Čustović, Haris Bradaric, A. Durak-Nalbantić
{"title":"Beta-blocker Use in Moderate and Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","authors":"F. Zvizdić, E. Begić, A. Mujaković, E. Hodžić, B. Prnjavorac, O. Bedak, F. Čustović, Haris Bradaric, A. Durak-Nalbantić","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2019.73.72-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The most appropriate choice of pharmacological treatment of heart rhythm disorders occurring in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular comorbidity is often a topic of debate between pulmonologists and cardiologists in clinical practice, although numerous studies and clinical trials have demonstrated evidence to support the use of selective beta-blockers (BBs) in these patients. Aim: To examine the difference in the number of exacerbations in patients treated with a combination of verapamil and digoxin or BB alone in patients with different COPD stages. Patients and methods: The study included 68 patients (n = 68) diagnosed with COPD who were followed-up during a 12-month period, and the number of exacerbations were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the stage of COPD: GOLD II (moderate), and GOLD III (severe), and in each group a subdivision was established in relation to the use of either a combination of verapamil and digoxin or the use of BBs alone in pharmacological treatment. The inclusion criteria for patients were defined as following: a) established diagnosis of COPD according to present or deteriorated relevant clinical symptoms and signs, b) the ejection fraction (EF) of a left ventricle (LV) >35%, and c) spirometric cut-points classified as GOLD II (FEV1 / FVC <0.7, FEV1 predicted 50-80%), or GOLD III (FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1 predicted 30-50%) stage of the COPD. The exclusion criteria were EF of LV <35% and a lethal outcome during a follow-up period (2 patients were encountered). Exacerbation was defined as functional deterioration of the COPD symptoms verified by spirometric functional testing, frequency of hospitalizations according to GOLD stage assignment or verified clinical symptoms deterioration. Results: Regardless the pharmacological treatment, there is a statistically significant increase in the number of COPD exacerbations, in a 12-month period follow-up, in the GOLD III group (severe) compared to the GOLD II group (moderate). In the group of patients taking verapamil and digoxin, a two-tailed t-test was used to analyze the results between the GOLD II and GOLD III stage groups, p = 0.01, and 2. In the group of patients taking BBs, a two-tailed t-test was also used to analyze the results between the GOLD II and GOLD III stage groups, p = 0.003). Within the COPD GOLD II stage group, there appears to be no statistically significant difference in the number of exacerbations between the patients taking verapamil and digoxin (n = 24) and the patients taking BBs alone (n = 15), although, in patients taking BBs alone, there appears to be a trend towards a decrease in the exacerbations compared to the number of exacerbations in patients taking verapamil and digoxin (p = 0.007). Within the COPD GOLD III stage group, there is no difference in the number of exacerbations between the patients taking verapamil and digoxin (n = 20), and the patients taking BBs alone (n = 9), as analyzed by a two-tailed t-test, p = 0.577. Conclusion: Use of selective BBs in the treatment of cardiovascular comorbidity in patients with COPD represents a far better choice of pharmacological approach in the treatment of patients diagnosed with COPD GOLD II (moderate) stage.","PeriodicalId":18414,"journal":{"name":"Medical Archives","volume":"13 1","pages":"72 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2019.73.72-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Introduction: The most appropriate choice of pharmacological treatment of heart rhythm disorders occurring in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular comorbidity is often a topic of debate between pulmonologists and cardiologists in clinical practice, although numerous studies and clinical trials have demonstrated evidence to support the use of selective beta-blockers (BBs) in these patients. Aim: To examine the difference in the number of exacerbations in patients treated with a combination of verapamil and digoxin or BB alone in patients with different COPD stages. Patients and methods: The study included 68 patients (n = 68) diagnosed with COPD who were followed-up during a 12-month period, and the number of exacerbations were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the stage of COPD: GOLD II (moderate), and GOLD III (severe), and in each group a subdivision was established in relation to the use of either a combination of verapamil and digoxin or the use of BBs alone in pharmacological treatment. The inclusion criteria for patients were defined as following: a) established diagnosis of COPD according to present or deteriorated relevant clinical symptoms and signs, b) the ejection fraction (EF) of a left ventricle (LV) >35%, and c) spirometric cut-points classified as GOLD II (FEV1 / FVC <0.7, FEV1 predicted 50-80%), or GOLD III (FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1 predicted 30-50%) stage of the COPD. The exclusion criteria were EF of LV <35% and a lethal outcome during a follow-up period (2 patients were encountered). Exacerbation was defined as functional deterioration of the COPD symptoms verified by spirometric functional testing, frequency of hospitalizations according to GOLD stage assignment or verified clinical symptoms deterioration. Results: Regardless the pharmacological treatment, there is a statistically significant increase in the number of COPD exacerbations, in a 12-month period follow-up, in the GOLD III group (severe) compared to the GOLD II group (moderate). In the group of patients taking verapamil and digoxin, a two-tailed t-test was used to analyze the results between the GOLD II and GOLD III stage groups, p = 0.01, and 2. In the group of patients taking BBs, a two-tailed t-test was also used to analyze the results between the GOLD II and GOLD III stage groups, p = 0.003). Within the COPD GOLD II stage group, there appears to be no statistically significant difference in the number of exacerbations between the patients taking verapamil and digoxin (n = 24) and the patients taking BBs alone (n = 15), although, in patients taking BBs alone, there appears to be a trend towards a decrease in the exacerbations compared to the number of exacerbations in patients taking verapamil and digoxin (p = 0.007). Within the COPD GOLD III stage group, there is no difference in the number of exacerbations between the patients taking verapamil and digoxin (n = 20), and the patients taking BBs alone (n = 9), as analyzed by a two-tailed t-test, p = 0.577. Conclusion: Use of selective BBs in the treatment of cardiovascular comorbidity in patients with COPD represents a far better choice of pharmacological approach in the treatment of patients diagnosed with COPD GOLD II (moderate) stage.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
-受体阻滞剂在中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的应用
在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和心血管合并症患者发生的心律失常的最适当的药物治疗选择经常是肺科医生和心脏病专家在临床实践中争论的话题,尽管大量研究和临床试验已经证明证据支持在这些患者中使用选择性β受体阻滞剂(BBs)。目的:探讨维拉帕米联合地高辛或单独使用BB治疗不同COPD分期患者急性加重次数的差异。患者和方法:该研究纳入了68例(n = 68)诊断为COPD的患者,随访12个月,并分析加重次数。根据COPD的分期将患者分为GOLD II(中度)和GOLD III(重度)两组,并在每组中根据维拉帕米和地高辛联合使用或单独使用BBs进行药物治疗建立细分。患者的入选标准定义如下:a)根据现有或恶化的相关临床症状和体征确定COPD的诊断,b)左心室(LV)射血分数(EF) >35%, c)肺活量测定临界值分为GOLD II期(FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1预测50-80%)或GOLD III期(FEV1/FVC <0.7, FEV1预测30-50%)COPD。排除标准为EF <35%,随访期间出现致死结果(2例)。加重定义为肺活量功能试验证实的COPD症状功能性恶化、根据GOLD分期分配的住院次数或证实的临床症状恶化。结果:无论药物治疗如何,在12个月的随访中,GOLD III组(重度)与GOLD II组(中度)相比,COPD加重次数有统计学意义上的显著增加。维拉帕米联合地高辛组采用双尾t检验分析GOLD II期组与GOLD III期组的结果,p = 0.01, p = 2。在服用BBs的患者组中,也采用双尾t检验分析GOLD II期组和GOLD III期组的结果,p = 0.003)。在COPD GOLD II期组中,服用维拉帕米和地高辛的患者(n = 24)与单独服用BBs的患者(n = 15)的加重次数似乎没有统计学差异,尽管单独服用BBs的患者与服用维拉帕米和地高辛的患者相比,加重次数似乎有减少的趋势(p = 0.007)。在COPD GOLD III期组中,服用维拉帕米和地高辛的患者(n = 20)和单独服用BBs的患者(n = 9)的加重次数无差异,经双尾t检验分析,p = 0.577。结论:在慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD) GOLD II(中度)期患者中,使用选择性BBs治疗心血管合并症是一种更好的药物治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Attitude of Children with Special Needs in The Learning Process Hemangioma–Benign Tumor in Childhood Historical Background of Medical Informatics Development Atypical Presentation of Erythema Nodosum Following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Hypothyroidism and Subclinical Hypothyroidism as a Consequence of COVID-19 Infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1