Prevalence of Vancomycin Resistance among Clinical Isolates of MRSA from Different Governorates in Egypt

Wesam Ibrahiem, Dina E Rizk, H. Kenawy, R. Hassan
{"title":"Prevalence of Vancomycin Resistance among Clinical Isolates of MRSA from Different Governorates in Egypt","authors":"Wesam Ibrahiem, Dina E Rizk, H. Kenawy, R. Hassan","doi":"10.21608/ejmm.2022.262673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : The uncontrolled use of vancomycin led to an upsurge of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) throughout the world. Objective : The goal of this study is to screen vancomycin resistance among MRSA isolates, determine antimicrobial resistance pattern and evaluate the distribution of virulence genes among these isolates. Methodology : A total of 127 S. aureus clinical isolates were used, MRSA isolates were identified and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern for nine antimicrobial agents from different classes was assessed. In addition, vancomycin MIC was determined by standard agar dilution method and PCR identification of vancomycin resistance encoding genes vanA and vanB was performed. Moreover, the prevalence of eight different virulence genes was determined among different vancomycin resistance categories. Results : All isolates were identified phenotypically as MRSA. However, mecA gene was detected only in 95.28% of isolates. The highest and lowest percentage of resistance was recorded for clindamycin (82.68%) and trimethoprim (11.81%), respectively. Vancomycin resistance level was 23.62% of isolates, while vanA and vanB genes were detected only in 16.67% and 10% of VRSA isolates, respectively. The highest prevalence of virulence genes was found for icaA, followed by hld, hlb, icaD, hlg, hla, tsst and cna, respectively in the tested isolates. In addition, VRSA isolates showed higher mean virulence score (MVS) of 3.6 compared to VISA and VSSA isolates. Conclusion : This study highlights the alarming problem of the increasing incidence of VRSA infections in Egypt. Therefore, there is an urgent need to rationalize vancomycin consumption and to continuously monitor the prevalence of VRSA strains.","PeriodicalId":22549,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejmm.2022.262673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background : The uncontrolled use of vancomycin led to an upsurge of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) throughout the world. Objective : The goal of this study is to screen vancomycin resistance among MRSA isolates, determine antimicrobial resistance pattern and evaluate the distribution of virulence genes among these isolates. Methodology : A total of 127 S. aureus clinical isolates were used, MRSA isolates were identified and antimicrobial sensitivity pattern for nine antimicrobial agents from different classes was assessed. In addition, vancomycin MIC was determined by standard agar dilution method and PCR identification of vancomycin resistance encoding genes vanA and vanB was performed. Moreover, the prevalence of eight different virulence genes was determined among different vancomycin resistance categories. Results : All isolates were identified phenotypically as MRSA. However, mecA gene was detected only in 95.28% of isolates. The highest and lowest percentage of resistance was recorded for clindamycin (82.68%) and trimethoprim (11.81%), respectively. Vancomycin resistance level was 23.62% of isolates, while vanA and vanB genes were detected only in 16.67% and 10% of VRSA isolates, respectively. The highest prevalence of virulence genes was found for icaA, followed by hld, hlb, icaD, hlg, hla, tsst and cna, respectively in the tested isolates. In addition, VRSA isolates showed higher mean virulence score (MVS) of 3.6 compared to VISA and VSSA isolates. Conclusion : This study highlights the alarming problem of the increasing incidence of VRSA infections in Egypt. Therefore, there is an urgent need to rationalize vancomycin consumption and to continuously monitor the prevalence of VRSA strains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃及不同省份MRSA临床分离株万古霉素耐药性流行情况
背景:万古霉素不加控制的使用导致万古霉素耐药金黄色葡萄球菌(VRSA)在世界范围内激增。目的:筛选MRSA分离株对万古霉素的耐药性,确定其耐药模式,评价其毒力基因的分布。方法:采用临床分离的127株金黄色葡萄球菌,鉴定MRSA菌株,并对不同类别的9种抗菌药物进行敏感性分析。采用标准琼脂稀释法测定万古霉素MIC, PCR鉴定万古霉素耐药编码基因vanA和vanB。此外,还测定了8种不同毒力基因在不同万古霉素耐药类别中的流行率。结果:所有分离株表型均为MRSA。而mecA基因仅在95.28%的分离株中检出。耐药比例最高的是克林霉素(82.68%),最低的是甲氧苄啶(11.81%)。万古霉素耐药率为23.62%,而vanA和vanB基因分别仅在16.67%和10%的VRSA分离株中检测到。毒力基因icaA的流行率最高,其次是hld、hlb、icaD、hlg、hla、tsst和cna。此外,VRSA分离株的平均毒力评分(MVS)为3.6,高于VISA和vsa分离株。结论:本研究突出了埃及VRSA感染发生率上升的令人担忧的问题。因此,迫切需要合理使用万古霉素,并持续监测VRSA菌株的流行情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Insights into Biofilm-based Multidrug Resistance in Acinetobacter Baumannii Isolated from Patients Hospitalized in Benha University Intensive Care Unit Association between Dysbiosis of Key Species of Nasal Microbiome and Allergic Rhinitis in Adult Patients Invasive Versus Noninvasive Methods for Diagnosis of Helicobacter Pylori infection Detection of Vancomycin Resistance among Hospital and Community-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Biofilm Formation by Acinetobacter Species Isolated from Intensive Care Units: Unveiling the Impact on Antibiotic Resistance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1