“We Thought It Would Last Forever”

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q1 HISTORY Labour-Le Travail Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.52975/llt.2023v91.008
Tee Wern Lim, Arn Keeling, Terre Satterfield
{"title":"“We Thought It Would Last Forever”","authors":"Tee Wern Lim, Arn Keeling, Terre Satterfield","doi":"10.52975/llt.2023v91.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although mine closures are an inherent feature of extractive industry, they tend to receive less attention in the literature on deindustrialization than the closures of manufacturing and other heavy industries. Until recently, the settler-colonial context of hinterland mineral development and its impact on northern Indigenous lands and communities in Canada have also remained largely unexplored within this literature. Mineral development is historically associated with the introduction of a colonial-capitalist industrial modernity across Canada’s northern regions. Yet the boom-and-bust nature and ultimate ephemerality of mineral development has meant that resource-extractive regions have also been subject to intensive “cyclonic” periods of closure and deindustrialization. This article examines the experience of deindustrialization on the part of the Inuit community of Arctic Bay, who were largely “left behind” by the closure of Nanisivik, Canada’s first High Arctic mine. Through documentary sources and oral history interviews we illustrate how, for Arctic Bay Inuit who were engaged in the cyclonic economies of Nanisivik’s development and closure, there were myriad dimensions of social loss, displacement, and resentment associated with the failure of this industrial enterprise to deliver promised benefits to Inuit, beyond more commonly understood socioeconomic impacts such as job loss.","PeriodicalId":33140,"journal":{"name":"Labour-Le Travail","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour-Le Travail","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52975/llt.2023v91.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although mine closures are an inherent feature of extractive industry, they tend to receive less attention in the literature on deindustrialization than the closures of manufacturing and other heavy industries. Until recently, the settler-colonial context of hinterland mineral development and its impact on northern Indigenous lands and communities in Canada have also remained largely unexplored within this literature. Mineral development is historically associated with the introduction of a colonial-capitalist industrial modernity across Canada’s northern regions. Yet the boom-and-bust nature and ultimate ephemerality of mineral development has meant that resource-extractive regions have also been subject to intensive “cyclonic” periods of closure and deindustrialization. This article examines the experience of deindustrialization on the part of the Inuit community of Arctic Bay, who were largely “left behind” by the closure of Nanisivik, Canada’s first High Arctic mine. Through documentary sources and oral history interviews we illustrate how, for Arctic Bay Inuit who were engaged in the cyclonic economies of Nanisivik’s development and closure, there were myriad dimensions of social loss, displacement, and resentment associated with the failure of this industrial enterprise to deliver promised benefits to Inuit, beyond more commonly understood socioeconomic impacts such as job loss.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们以为它会永远持续下去”
虽然关闭矿山是采掘业的固有特征,但在关于去工业化的文献中,它们往往比关闭制造业和其他重工业受到的关注要少。直到最近,内陆矿产开发的移民-殖民背景及其对加拿大北部土著土地和社区的影响在这一文献中也基本上未被探索。矿产开发在历史上与加拿大北部地区殖民资本主义工业现代化的引入有关。然而,矿产开发的兴衰性质和最终的短暂性意味着资源开采地区也受到密集的关闭和去工业化的“旋风”时期的影响。这篇文章考察了北极湾因纽特人社区的去工业化经历,他们在很大程度上被加拿大第一个高北极矿井Nanisivik的关闭所“抛弃”。通过文献资料和口述历史访谈,我们说明了北极湾因纽特人是如何参与南尼斯维克开发和关闭的旋风经济的,除了人们普遍理解的失业等社会经济影响外,还有无数的社会损失、流离失所和怨恨,这些都与这家工业企业未能向因纽特人提供承诺的利益有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Labour-Le Travail
Labour-Le Travail Multiple-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Jacinthe Michaud, Frontiers of Feminism: Movements and Influences in Québec and Italy, 1960–1980 (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2021) Krys Maki, Ineligible: Single Mothers Under Welfare Surveillance (Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing 2021) Mark Doussar and Greg Schrock, Justice at work: The Rise of Economic and Racial Justice Coalitions in Cities (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2022) Left Americana and the Ludlow Monument Contributors / Collaborateurs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1