Decline in informal helping during the first COVID-19 lockdown: a longitudinal analysis of Dutch data

IF 2.3 1区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY European Societies Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI:10.1080/14616696.2023.2200503
Marlou J. M. Ramaekers, E. Verbakel, G. Kraaykamp
{"title":"Decline in informal helping during the first COVID-19 lockdown: a longitudinal analysis of Dutch data","authors":"Marlou J. M. Ramaekers, E. Verbakel, G. Kraaykamp","doi":"10.1080/14616696.2023.2200503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like many European countries, the Netherlands locked down in March 2020 to combat the spread of COVID-19. Although government officials called for solidarity, the lockdown measures made it more difficult to help fellow citizens. In this study, we examine whether informal helping declined during the first lockdown in the Netherlands and to what extent changes depended on people's resources (time/health), motivation (solidarity/COVID concerns) and opportunities (social contact). In general, we expected an overall decline of informal helping, and this decline was expected to be smaller for people with more resources, motivation, and opportunities. We used data from the SOCON COVID-19 Panel survey that were collected through internet and telephone interviews before (February 2019/2020) and shortly after the first lockdown in the Netherlands (July 2020) (N = 522). We examine the impact of resources, motivation and opportunities for informal help provided to relatives, friends and neighbors separately. Indeed, results showed that people overall helped less during the lockdown than before. The decline in helping relatives was smaller among those who lost work, were worried about relatives, experienced solidarity with others or had more contact with relatives during the lockdown. People who contacted more with neighbors during the lockdown period provided more informal help to them during the lockdown than before. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","PeriodicalId":47392,"journal":{"name":"European Societies","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2023.2200503","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Like many European countries, the Netherlands locked down in March 2020 to combat the spread of COVID-19. Although government officials called for solidarity, the lockdown measures made it more difficult to help fellow citizens. In this study, we examine whether informal helping declined during the first lockdown in the Netherlands and to what extent changes depended on people's resources (time/health), motivation (solidarity/COVID concerns) and opportunities (social contact). In general, we expected an overall decline of informal helping, and this decline was expected to be smaller for people with more resources, motivation, and opportunities. We used data from the SOCON COVID-19 Panel survey that were collected through internet and telephone interviews before (February 2019/2020) and shortly after the first lockdown in the Netherlands (July 2020) (N = 522). We examine the impact of resources, motivation and opportunities for informal help provided to relatives, friends and neighbors separately. Indeed, results showed that people overall helped less during the lockdown than before. The decline in helping relatives was smaller among those who lost work, were worried about relatives, experienced solidarity with others or had more contact with relatives during the lockdown. People who contacted more with neighbors during the lockdown period provided more informal help to them during the lockdown than before. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在第一次COVID-19封锁期间,非正式帮助减少:对荷兰数据的纵向分析
与许多欧洲国家一样,荷兰于2020年3月封锁了新冠肺炎的传播。尽管政府官员呼吁团结一致,但封锁措施使帮助同胞变得更加困难。在这项研究中,我们研究了在荷兰第一次封锁期间,非正式帮助是否有所下降,以及变化在多大程度上取决于人们的资源(时间/健康)、动机(团结/COVID担忧)和机会(社会联系)。总的来说,我们预计非正式帮助的总体下降,而对于拥有更多资源、动力和机会的人来说,这种下降预计会小一些。我们使用了SOCON COVID-19小组调查的数据,这些数据是在荷兰第一次封锁之前(2019年2月/2020年)和之后不久(2020年7月)通过互联网和电话采访收集的(N = 522)。我们分别考察了向亲戚、朋友和邻居提供非正式帮助的资源、动机和机会的影响。事实上,结果显示,在封锁期间,人们总体上提供的帮助比以前少了。在封锁期间,失业、担心亲人、与他人团结或与亲人接触较多的人,帮助亲人的减少幅度较小。在封锁期间与邻居接触更多的人在封锁期间提供了比以前更多的非正式帮助。©2023作者。由Informa UK Limited出版,以Taylor & Francis Group的名义进行交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Societies
European Societies SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.20%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: European Societies, the flagship journal of the European Sociological Association, aims to promote and share sociological research related to Europe. As a generalist sociology journal, we welcome research from all areas of sociology. However, we have a specific focus on addressing the socio-economic and socio-political challenges faced by European societies, as well as exploring all aspects of European social life and socioculture. Our journal is committed to upholding ethical standards and academic independence. We conduct a rigorous and anonymous review process for all submitted manuscripts. This ensures the quality and integrity of the research we publish. European Societies encourages a plurality of perspectives within the sociology discipline. We embrace a wide range of sociological methods and theoretical approaches. Furthermore, we are open to articles that adopt a historical perspective and engage in comparative research involving Europe as a whole or specific European countries. We also appreciate comparative studies that include societies beyond Europe. In summary, European Societies is dedicated to promoting sociological research with a focus on European societies. We welcome diverse methodological and theoretical approaches, historical perspectives, and comparative studies involving Europe and other societies.
期刊最新文献
Settling into uncertainty and risk amidst the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine Gender compositions of occupations and firms jointly shape switches from gender-atypical towards more gender-typical positions The effect of the month of birth on academic achievement: heterogeneity by social origin and gender Do they think that joy and misery are temporary? Comparing trajectories of current and predicted life satisfaction across life events Narrowing inequalities through redistribution. A relational inequality approach to female managers and the gender wage gap
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1