Proof of shoe slip-resistance by a walking traction test

D.P. Manning, C. Jones, M. Bruce
{"title":"Proof of shoe slip-resistance by a walking traction test","authors":"D.P. Manning,&nbsp;C. Jones,&nbsp;M. Bruce","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90050-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Manning, D.P., Jones, C. and Bruce, M., 1990. Proof of shoe slip-resistance by a walking traction test. <em>Journal of Occupational Accidents</em>, 12: 255–270.</p><p>There is no universally acceptable or reliable method of measuring shoe and floor friction, and few of the many published methods are capable of measuring coefficient of friction (c.o.f.) of shoes worn on the feet. A new walking traction test is described, in which a test subject walks on slippery floor surfaces, pulling against a set of springs and the maximum c.o.f. attained before the feet slip, is measured.</p><p>Three soling materials were selected from a large number previously tested by a different method of measuring c.o.f. One had registered higher than average c.o.f. and the other two lower than average c.o.f. The three materials were moulded onto bowling shoes with flat soles and no separate heel or tread pattern. One set of three pairs was reserved for water lubricated surfaces and the other set for oily surfaces. Coefficient of friction of the shoes was measured by the new walking test on three separate floor surfaces lubricated in turn with water and oil. The shoe soles were then abraded or polished in ten stages with an orbital sander. Surface roughness and c.o.f. were measured after each abrasion treatment.</p><p>With successive abrasion treatments, the soling selected for above average c.o.f. gradually became rougher than the other two materials and it nearly always recorded higher c.o.f. readings when tested by the walking traction method. Its superior grip was demonstrated at roughness readings above 15 microns on water lubricated floors; c.o.f. of 0.43 was achieved on all three floors. The other two solings could not be roughened more than 15 microns. On oily surfaces, soling roughness of 21.5 microns only produced a c.o.f. of 0.2. Permanent roughness of solings is one of the properties needed for safer walking in slippery conditions. This new walking traction test convincingly measures shoe and floor friction up to a maximum of 0.43 and will assist the search for slip-resistant footwear.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"12 4","pages":"Pages 255-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90050-6","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0376634990900506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Manning, D.P., Jones, C. and Bruce, M., 1990. Proof of shoe slip-resistance by a walking traction test. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 12: 255–270.

There is no universally acceptable or reliable method of measuring shoe and floor friction, and few of the many published methods are capable of measuring coefficient of friction (c.o.f.) of shoes worn on the feet. A new walking traction test is described, in which a test subject walks on slippery floor surfaces, pulling against a set of springs and the maximum c.o.f. attained before the feet slip, is measured.

Three soling materials were selected from a large number previously tested by a different method of measuring c.o.f. One had registered higher than average c.o.f. and the other two lower than average c.o.f. The three materials were moulded onto bowling shoes with flat soles and no separate heel or tread pattern. One set of three pairs was reserved for water lubricated surfaces and the other set for oily surfaces. Coefficient of friction of the shoes was measured by the new walking test on three separate floor surfaces lubricated in turn with water and oil. The shoe soles were then abraded or polished in ten stages with an orbital sander. Surface roughness and c.o.f. were measured after each abrasion treatment.

With successive abrasion treatments, the soling selected for above average c.o.f. gradually became rougher than the other two materials and it nearly always recorded higher c.o.f. readings when tested by the walking traction method. Its superior grip was demonstrated at roughness readings above 15 microns on water lubricated floors; c.o.f. of 0.43 was achieved on all three floors. The other two solings could not be roughened more than 15 microns. On oily surfaces, soling roughness of 21.5 microns only produced a c.o.f. of 0.2. Permanent roughness of solings is one of the properties needed for safer walking in slippery conditions. This new walking traction test convincingly measures shoe and floor friction up to a maximum of 0.43 and will assist the search for slip-resistant footwear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过行走牵引试验证明鞋的防滑性
曼宁,d.p.,琼斯,C.和布鲁斯,M., 1990。通过行走牵引试验证明鞋的防滑性。职业事故学报,12:255-270。目前还没有普遍接受或可靠的方法来测量鞋子和地板的摩擦,而且在许多已发表的方法中,很少有方法能够测量穿在脚上的鞋子的摩擦系数(c.o.f.)。描述了一种新的步行牵引测试,在该测试中,测试对象在光滑的地面上行走,拉动一组弹簧,测量脚滑前达到的最大c.o.f.。我们从之前用不同的测量c.o.f.的方法测试过的大量鞋底材料中选择了三种材料,其中一种材料的c.o.f.高于平均水平,另外两种材料的c.o.f.低于平均水平。这三种材料被浇铸在平底保龄球鞋上,鞋底没有单独的后跟或胎面图案。三对中的一组用于水润滑表面,另一组用于油性表面。鞋子的摩擦系数是通过新的行走测试在三个不同的地板表面上依次用水和油润滑来测量的。然后用轨道磨砂机分十个阶段研磨或抛光鞋底。每次磨损处理后测量表面粗糙度和c.o.f.。经过连续的磨损处理,选择c.o.f.高于平均值的鞋底逐渐变得比其他两种材料更粗糙,并且在步行牵引法测试时几乎总是记录更高的c.o.f.读数。在水润滑地板上的粗糙度读数超过15微米时,其优越的抓地力得到了证明;所有三层的C.O.F.都达到了0.43。另外两种鞋底的粗化不能超过15微米。在油性表面上,21.5微米的粗糙度只产生0.2的c.o.f。鞋底的永久粗糙度是在湿滑条件下更安全行走所需的特性之一。这项新的步行牵引力测试令人信服地测量了鞋子和地板的摩擦,最大可达0.43,有助于寻找防滑鞋类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The physiology of work Physical ergonomics job design: an accident prevention approach to control upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in manufacturing industry An indirect cost theory of work accident prevention Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1