The 6-minute walk-test in type 2 diabetics predicts to some extent maximal aerobic capacity but not its training-induced improvement

J. Brun, J. Myzia, G. Bui, Elizabeth Grubka, Marie Karafiat, J. Mercier, E. R. Mauverger
{"title":"The 6-minute walk-test in type 2 diabetics predicts to some extent maximal aerobic capacity but not its training-induced improvement","authors":"J. Brun, J. Myzia, G. Bui, Elizabeth Grubka, Marie Karafiat, J. Mercier, E. R. Mauverger","doi":"10.17352/amm.000020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Six- minutes’ walk-test (6MWT) is a measure of physical fitness widely studied and validated in chronic pathologies with sedentary lifestyles. It is an aerobic fitness test, correlated with maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) in some studies, but this correlation is not well established in diabetes. We assessed the extent to which it predicts VO2max and its training-induced changes in type 2 diabetics. \nMaterials and methods: Twenty-five type 2 diabetics were randomized and divided into two groups: 13 completed a physical training program (eight hospital education sessions continued at home through two weekly 30-45-minute sessions at an intensity corresponding to the first ventilatory threshold VT1) and the remaining 12 continued their usual treatment unchanged. Results: After 1 year training maintained maximum aerobic capacity, while it decreased significantly in the untrained group (p=0.014). Voorrips’ activity score was correlated with VO2max (r= 0.44, p= 0.05) and with the distance walked at 6MWT (r=0.446, p=0.05). The distance walked during 6MWT is correlated with VO2max before (r= 0.456 p= 0.05) and after (r= 0.714 p<0.001) and on all values measured before and after (r= 0.571 p= 0.01). The change in MWT does not predict that of VO2max to which it is not correlated (r=0.318; NS), but it is weakly correlated to that of the VT1 (r= 0.435 p-0.05) while the absolute values of VT1 and 6MWT are not correlated at all. 6MWT was not correlated with HbA1c. \nConclusions: as in other sedentary populations, 6MWT is an indicator (approximate but easy and economical) of aerobic fitness. However, it does not measure training-induced changes in aerobic fitness, its variations being rather a marker of those of the first ventilatory threshold.","PeriodicalId":91838,"journal":{"name":"Annals of musculoskeletal medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of musculoskeletal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17352/amm.000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Six- minutes’ walk-test (6MWT) is a measure of physical fitness widely studied and validated in chronic pathologies with sedentary lifestyles. It is an aerobic fitness test, correlated with maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) in some studies, but this correlation is not well established in diabetes. We assessed the extent to which it predicts VO2max and its training-induced changes in type 2 diabetics. Materials and methods: Twenty-five type 2 diabetics were randomized and divided into two groups: 13 completed a physical training program (eight hospital education sessions continued at home through two weekly 30-45-minute sessions at an intensity corresponding to the first ventilatory threshold VT1) and the remaining 12 continued their usual treatment unchanged. Results: After 1 year training maintained maximum aerobic capacity, while it decreased significantly in the untrained group (p=0.014). Voorrips’ activity score was correlated with VO2max (r= 0.44, p= 0.05) and with the distance walked at 6MWT (r=0.446, p=0.05). The distance walked during 6MWT is correlated with VO2max before (r= 0.456 p= 0.05) and after (r= 0.714 p<0.001) and on all values measured before and after (r= 0.571 p= 0.01). The change in MWT does not predict that of VO2max to which it is not correlated (r=0.318; NS), but it is weakly correlated to that of the VT1 (r= 0.435 p-0.05) while the absolute values of VT1 and 6MWT are not correlated at all. 6MWT was not correlated with HbA1c. Conclusions: as in other sedentary populations, 6MWT is an indicator (approximate but easy and economical) of aerobic fitness. However, it does not measure training-induced changes in aerobic fitness, its variations being rather a marker of those of the first ventilatory threshold.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病患者6分钟步行试验在一定程度上预测最大有氧能力,但不能预测其训练引起的改善
目的:6分钟步行测试(6MWT)是一种在久坐生活方式的慢性疾病中广泛研究和验证的身体健康测量方法。这是一种有氧体能测试,在一些研究中与最大耗氧量(VO2max)相关,但这种相关性在糖尿病中尚未得到很好的证实。我们评估了它预测2型糖尿病患者最大摄氧量及其训练引起的变化的程度。材料和方法:25名2型糖尿病患者被随机分为两组:13名完成了体育训练计划(8次医院教育课程,每周两次,30-45分钟,强度与第一次通气阈值VT1相对应),其余12名继续他们的常规治疗。结果:训练1年后保持最大有氧能力,而未训练组的最大有氧能力明显下降(p=0.014)。Voorrips的活动评分与VO2max (r=0.44, p=0.05)和6MWT时步行距离(r=0.446, p=0.05)相关。6MWT期间行走距离与运动前后(r= 0.456 p= 0.05)和运动前后(r= 0.714 p<0.001)的最大耗氧量相关,与运动前后测量的所有值相关(r= 0.571 p= 0.01)。MWT的变化不能预测VO2max的变化,因为它与VO2max不相关(r=0.318;NS),但与VT1的相关性较弱(r= 0.435 p-0.05),而VT1与6MWT的绝对值完全不相关。6MWT与HbA1c无相关性。结论:与其他久坐人群一样,6MWT是有氧适能的一个指标(近似但简单且经济)。然而,它并没有测量训练引起的有氧适应度的变化,其变化更像是第一次通气阈值的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of postural control by personal mobility on human joint movements-prototype of a new alert system for personal mobility devices The eTRIMP method for bodybuilding training load assessment: A review with a case study Intravenous single dose of tranexamic acid safely reduces blood loss and the need for transfusion in elderly patients with hip fracture. A randomized double-blinded controlled trial at 1-year follow-up A case study of the association between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, weight training and shoulder dislocation Spondyloepipheseal dysplasia tarda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1