The Global Experiment: How the International Atomic Energy Agency Proved Dosimetry to Be a Techno-Diplomatic Issue.

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of South American Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-10 DOI:10.1007/s00048-022-00336-9
Maria Rentetzi
{"title":"The Global Experiment: How the International Atomic Energy Agency Proved Dosimetry to Be a Techno-Diplomatic Issue.","authors":"Maria Rentetzi","doi":"10.1007/s00048-022-00336-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper draws attention to the role of the IAEA in shaping radiation dosimetry practices, instrumentation, and standards in the late 1950s and 1960s. It traces the beginnings of the IAEA's radiation dose intercomparison program which targeted all member states and involved the WHO so as to standardize dosimetry on a global level. To standardize dosimetric measurement methods, techniques, and instruments, however, one had to devise a method of comparing absorbed dose measurements in one laboratory with those performed in others with a high degree of accuracy. In 1964 the IAEA thus started to build up what I call the \"global experiment,\" an intercomparison of radiation doses with participating laboratories from many of its member states. To carry out the process of worldwide standardization in radiation dosimetry, I argue, an organization with the diplomatic power and global reach of the IAEA was absolutely necessary. Thus, \"global experiment\" indicates a novel understanding of the experimental process. What counts as an experiment became governed by a process that was designed and strictly regulated by an international organization; it took place simultaneously in several laboratories across the globe, while experimental data became centrally owned and alienated from those that produced it.</p>","PeriodicalId":50047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of South American Earth Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"167-195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of South American Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-022-00336-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper draws attention to the role of the IAEA in shaping radiation dosimetry practices, instrumentation, and standards in the late 1950s and 1960s. It traces the beginnings of the IAEA's radiation dose intercomparison program which targeted all member states and involved the WHO so as to standardize dosimetry on a global level. To standardize dosimetric measurement methods, techniques, and instruments, however, one had to devise a method of comparing absorbed dose measurements in one laboratory with those performed in others with a high degree of accuracy. In 1964 the IAEA thus started to build up what I call the "global experiment," an intercomparison of radiation doses with participating laboratories from many of its member states. To carry out the process of worldwide standardization in radiation dosimetry, I argue, an organization with the diplomatic power and global reach of the IAEA was absolutely necessary. Thus, "global experiment" indicates a novel understanding of the experimental process. What counts as an experiment became governed by a process that was designed and strictly regulated by an international organization; it took place simultaneously in several laboratories across the globe, while experimental data became centrally owned and alienated from those that produced it.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球实验:国际原子能机构如何证明剂量测定是一个技术外交问题。
本文提请注意国际原子能机构在 20 世纪 50 年代末和 60 年代形成辐射剂量测定实践、仪器和标准方面的作用。它追溯了国际原子能机构辐射剂量相互比较计划的开端,该计划针对所有成员国,并让世界卫生组织参与其中,以便在全球范围内实现剂量测定的标准化。然而,要实现剂量测定方法、技术和仪器的标准化,就必须设计一种方法,将一个实验室的吸收剂量测量结果与其他实验室的吸收剂量测量结果进行高度精确的比较。因此,国际原子能机构于 1964 年开始建立我所说的 "全球实验",即与许多成员国的实验室进行辐射剂量的相互比较。我认为,要在全球范围内实现辐射剂量测定的标准化进程,绝对需要一个像国际原子能机构这样具有外交实力和全球影响力的组织。因此,"全球实验 "表明了对实验过程的全新理解。什么才算实验,由一个国际组织设计并严格监管的过程来决定;实验在全球多个实验室同时进行,而实验数据则由中央拥有,并与数据产生者分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of South American Earth Sciences
Journal of South American Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
364
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Papers must have a regional appeal and should present work of more than local significance. Research papers dealing with the regional geology of South American cratons and mobile belts, within the following research fields: -Economic geology, metallogenesis and hydrocarbon genesis and reservoirs. -Geophysics, geochemistry, volcanology, igneous and metamorphic petrology. -Tectonics, neo- and seismotectonics and geodynamic modeling. -Geomorphology, geological hazards, environmental geology, climate change in America and Antarctica, and soil research. -Stratigraphy, sedimentology, structure and basin evolution. -Paleontology, paleoecology, paleoclimatology and Quaternary geology. New developments in already established regional projects and new initiatives dealing with the geology of the continent will be summarized and presented on a regular basis. Short notes, discussions, book reviews and conference and workshop reports will also be included when relevant.
期刊最新文献
Petrogenesis, magmatic evolution of the Morro de São João Alkaline Massif, southeastern Brazil, and implications for the evolution of the South American Platform Editorial Board Integrating geospatial techniques and machine learning for assessing soil erosion and associated geomorphic risks Flow-type controls on tributary alluvial fan formation along the Andes (18-34°S) Ichnology of osteoderms of the pampathere Holmesina occidentalis from the Late Pleistocene / Early Holocene Tablazo Formation, Santa Elena Peninsula, Ecuador
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1