Electronic assistive technology use and supported employment.

Parker Heman, D. Rhodes, Carol Cox
{"title":"Electronic assistive technology use and supported employment.","authors":"Parker Heman, D. Rhodes, Carol Cox","doi":"10.1111/jar.13005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nLevel of electronic assistive technology use by people with intellectual disabilities is lower than for other disability groups.\n\n\nMETHODS\nIn this mixed-methods exploratory study during the pandemic, staff (online survey) and executive administration (focus group) from a regional supported employment service provider in the Midwest US were surveyed about use of and barriers to use of electronic assistive technology for their clients with intellectual disabilities.\n\n\nRESULTS\nForty percent of staff reported 'not' using any of the assistive technologies with their clients. Executive administration perceived that they should be providing technology resources to clients and staff. Both groups rated expense, access, and complexity as barriers to assistive technology use at the client's worksite.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIdentifying the types of assistive technologies that can be most easily accessed and most cost-effective, including lower-cost consumer market devices, as employment supports for people with intellectual disabilities may be a first step in helping to overcome perceived barriers to use.","PeriodicalId":73610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.13005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Level of electronic assistive technology use by people with intellectual disabilities is lower than for other disability groups. METHODS In this mixed-methods exploratory study during the pandemic, staff (online survey) and executive administration (focus group) from a regional supported employment service provider in the Midwest US were surveyed about use of and barriers to use of electronic assistive technology for their clients with intellectual disabilities. RESULTS Forty percent of staff reported 'not' using any of the assistive technologies with their clients. Executive administration perceived that they should be providing technology resources to clients and staff. Both groups rated expense, access, and complexity as barriers to assistive technology use at the client's worksite. CONCLUSIONS Identifying the types of assistive technologies that can be most easily accessed and most cost-effective, including lower-cost consumer market devices, as employment supports for people with intellectual disabilities may be a first step in helping to overcome perceived barriers to use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子辅助技术的使用和支持就业。
背景智力残疾者使用电子辅助技术的水平低于其他残疾群体。方法在这项混合方法的探索性研究中,对来自美国中西部地区支持就业服务提供商的工作人员(在线调查)和行政管理人员(焦点小组)进行了调查,了解他们的智力残疾客户使用电子辅助技术的情况和使用障碍。结果:40%的员工表示“没有”对客户使用任何辅助技术。行政部门认为他们应该向客户和员工提供技术资源。两组都认为费用、访问和复杂性是在客户工作场所使用辅助技术的障碍。结论确定最容易获得和最具成本效益的辅助技术类型,包括成本较低的消费市场设备,作为智障人士的就业支持,可能是帮助他们克服使用障碍的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Burnout Among Staff Working in Services for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Outcomes of a Creative Ability-Based Intervention: Advancing Independence in Learners With Severe Intellectual Disability. Childhood and Adulthood Predictors of Community Participation by Autistic Adults With and Without Intellectual Disability. Proxy-report in individuals with intellectual disability: A scoping review. Video-blogs and linguistic simplification for students with intellectual disability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1