Civic Crowdfunding as Urban Digital Platform in Milan and Amsterdam: Don’t take pictures on a rainy day!

Letizia Chiappini , Jochem de Vries
{"title":"Civic Crowdfunding as Urban Digital Platform in Milan and Amsterdam: Don’t take pictures on a rainy day!","authors":"Letizia Chiappini ,&nbsp;Jochem de Vries","doi":"10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cities are a conducive context for the emergence of digital platforms and at the same time cities are reshaped by the digital spaces that are created by these platforms. The key features that set Urban Digital Platforms (UDPs) apart from other digital platforms are the allocation of public goods and services at an urban scale (via P2P transaction), and their orientation towards civic and grassroots initiatives in area’s which the local state agencies have a significant role in steering urban development patterns. This article explores the spaces and realms of interactions and engagements which ‘urban digital platform(s) (UDPs) have created in two prominent European cities, Milan and Amsterdam. By focusing on civic crowdfunding initiatives, it shows that digital platforms not only unleash societal initiatives but also have the potential to fundamentally change (urban) political processes, as their gatekeeping principles provide a powerful frame by which projects are selected. This paper sheds light on how platform urbanism and the new lens of digital geography are critical in investigating ‘alternative platforms’ as civic crowdfunding and their mutual co-constitution between technology, sociality, and spatiality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100377,"journal":{"name":"Digital Geography and Society","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378321000155/pdfft?md5=a6b7e4c4a30ff1302092c6c3c03388d4&pid=1-s2.0-S2666378321000155-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Geography and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378321000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Cities are a conducive context for the emergence of digital platforms and at the same time cities are reshaped by the digital spaces that are created by these platforms. The key features that set Urban Digital Platforms (UDPs) apart from other digital platforms are the allocation of public goods and services at an urban scale (via P2P transaction), and their orientation towards civic and grassroots initiatives in area’s which the local state agencies have a significant role in steering urban development patterns. This article explores the spaces and realms of interactions and engagements which ‘urban digital platform(s) (UDPs) have created in two prominent European cities, Milan and Amsterdam. By focusing on civic crowdfunding initiatives, it shows that digital platforms not only unleash societal initiatives but also have the potential to fundamentally change (urban) political processes, as their gatekeeping principles provide a powerful frame by which projects are selected. This paper sheds light on how platform urbanism and the new lens of digital geography are critical in investigating ‘alternative platforms’ as civic crowdfunding and their mutual co-constitution between technology, sociality, and spatiality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
米兰和阿姆斯特丹市民众筹成为城市数字平台:雨天不要拍照!
城市是数字平台出现的有利环境,同时城市也被这些平台创造的数字空间重塑。将城市数字平台(UDPs)与其他数字平台区分开来的关键特征是在城市规模上(通过P2P交易)分配公共产品和服务,以及它们面向地方政府机构在指导城市发展模式方面发挥重要作用的地区的公民和基层倡议。本文探讨了城市数字平台(UDPs)在米兰和阿姆斯特丹这两个著名的欧洲城市创造的互动和参与的空间和领域。通过关注公民众筹倡议,它表明数字平台不仅释放了社会倡议,而且具有从根本上改变(城市)政治进程的潜力,因为它们的把关原则为选择项目提供了强大的框架。本文阐明了平台城市主义和数字地理学的新视角如何在调查公民众筹等“替代平台”及其在技术、社会性和空间性之间的相互构成方面至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Broker bureaucracies: The subsidiary offices of the digitalizing state (Retail) platform legitimation through municipal partnerships? Characterizing climate change sentiments in Alaska on social media Counter-mapping platformization. Rethinking the spatial differentiation of platform control, labor relations and restaurant virtualization in proprietary markets for food-delivery Synthetic geospatial data and fake geography: A case study on the implications of AI-derived data in a data-intensive society
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1