ESG-driven approach to managing insurance companies’ sustainable development

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Insurance Markets and Companies Pub Date : 2020-12-24 DOI:10.21511/ins.11(1).2020.05
I. Khovrak
{"title":"ESG-driven approach to managing insurance companies’ sustainable development","authors":"I. Khovrak","doi":"10.21511/ins.11(1).2020.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental, social and governance criteria (ESG) are considered to be the main factors in measuring the sustainability and ethical impact of companies. This article focuses on comparing the ability of insurance companies to use an ESG-driven approach to managing their sustainable development. The study is conducted using comparative analysis, statistical analysis, and a case study method. The study compares six ESG Ratings on four main criteria (dependent variables, independent variables, scale type, sample), that allows choosing the most appropriate rating for the analysis of insurance companies. As a result, 156 insurance companies are compared by the level of ESG risk (low ESG risk – 24 companies, medium ESG risk – 111 companies, high ESG risk – 21 companies) and by geographical affiliation (26 countries) using descriptive statistics. The assessment of effectiveness of the ESG-driven approach to managing sustainable development of insurance companies is carried out on the example of 16 companies by comparing their non-financial reporting (the sample is selected based on of the annual report for 2019-2020). The study identifies the most common guidelines for report development, as well as components of the ESG-driven approach: environmental (waste and pollution, climate change, energy efficiency), social (workforce and diversity, customer engagement, communities), governance (code and values, reporting, risk management). The study systematizes the best practices of insurance companies for applying the ESG-driven approach to manage their sustainable development and highlights the need for insurance companies to improve their reporting and disclosure practices related to the development of the ESG-driven approach.\nAcknowledgmentComments from the Editor and anonymous referees have been gratefully acknowledged.","PeriodicalId":32827,"journal":{"name":"Insurance Markets and Companies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance Markets and Companies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21511/ins.11(1).2020.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Environmental, social and governance criteria (ESG) are considered to be the main factors in measuring the sustainability and ethical impact of companies. This article focuses on comparing the ability of insurance companies to use an ESG-driven approach to managing their sustainable development. The study is conducted using comparative analysis, statistical analysis, and a case study method. The study compares six ESG Ratings on four main criteria (dependent variables, independent variables, scale type, sample), that allows choosing the most appropriate rating for the analysis of insurance companies. As a result, 156 insurance companies are compared by the level of ESG risk (low ESG risk – 24 companies, medium ESG risk – 111 companies, high ESG risk – 21 companies) and by geographical affiliation (26 countries) using descriptive statistics. The assessment of effectiveness of the ESG-driven approach to managing sustainable development of insurance companies is carried out on the example of 16 companies by comparing their non-financial reporting (the sample is selected based on of the annual report for 2019-2020). The study identifies the most common guidelines for report development, as well as components of the ESG-driven approach: environmental (waste and pollution, climate change, energy efficiency), social (workforce and diversity, customer engagement, communities), governance (code and values, reporting, risk management). The study systematizes the best practices of insurance companies for applying the ESG-driven approach to manage their sustainable development and highlights the need for insurance companies to improve their reporting and disclosure practices related to the development of the ESG-driven approach. AcknowledgmentComments from the Editor and anonymous referees have been gratefully acknowledged.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
esg驱动下的保险公司可持续发展管理方法
环境、社会和治理标准(ESG)被认为是衡量公司可持续性和道德影响的主要因素。本文的重点是比较保险公司使用esg驱动方法来管理其可持续发展的能力。本研究采用比较分析法、统计分析法和个案研究法。该研究在四个主要标准(因变量、自变量、规模类型、样本)上比较了六个ESG评级,从而可以选择最合适的评级来分析保险公司。因此,156家保险公司根据ESG风险水平(低ESG风险- 24家公司,中等ESG风险- 111家公司,高ESG风险- 21家公司)和地理归属(26个国家)进行了描述性统计比较。通过比较16家保险公司的非财务报告,对esg驱动的保险公司可持续发展管理方法的有效性进行了评估(样本是根据2019-2020年度报告选择的)。该研究确定了最常见的报告编写指南,以及esg驱动方法的组成部分:环境(废物和污染、气候变化、能源效率)、社会(劳动力和多样性、客户参与、社区)、治理(代码和价值观、报告、风险管理)。该研究将保险公司应用esg驱动方法管理其可持续发展的最佳实践系统化,并强调保险公司需要改进与esg驱动方法发展相关的报告和披露实践。感谢编辑和匿名审稿人的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Insurance Markets and Companies
Insurance Markets and Companies Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficiency assessment and trends in the insurance industry: A bibliometric analysis of DEA application Competitive positioning and market share of selected insurance companies: case of Nigeria Leadership in the digital era: Exploring the nexus between leadership styles and job satisfaction. The mediating role of perceived organizational politics in Jordanian insurance companies Contribution of the non-life insurance sector to the economic growth of Nepal: Analysis from the EGLS approach The use of blockchain in the insurance industry: A bibliometric analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1