Soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage estimated with the root-zone enrichment method under conventional and conservation land management across North Carolina
{"title":"Soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage estimated with the root-zone enrichment method under conventional and conservation land management across North Carolina","authors":"A. Franzluebbers","doi":"10.2489/jswc.2023.00064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agriculture is a globally dominating land use, so efforts to restore soil organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) lost through historical degradation could have enormous benefits to production and the environment, particularly by storing an organic reserve of nutrients in soil and avoiding the return of a small portion of biologically cycling C to the atmosphere. Estimates of soil organic C and N storage from conservation agricultural management are still limited when considered in proportion to the large diversity of environmental and edaphic conditions. A study was undertaken to determine the total, baseline, and root-zone enrichment stocks of soil organic C and N as affected by land use on 25 research stations distributed throughout North Carolina. Root-zone enrichment of organic matter is that portion influenced by contemporary management, and baseline is that portion dominated by pedogenesis. These fractions were compared with more traditional estimation procedures. Soil organic C and N were strongly negatively associated with sand concentration. Although physiographic region influenced overall soil C and N contents, variations in soil type and research station management within a region were equally influential. Soil organic C and N stocks were strongly affected by land use, which did not interact with the soil textural effect. Across the 25 research station locations, root-zone enrichment of soil organic C followed the order (p < 0.01) conventional-till cropland (11.1 Mg C ha−1) < no-till cropland (21.5 Mg C ha−1) < grassland (29.6 Mg C ha−1) < woodland (38.6 Mg C ha−1). Root-zone enrichment of total soil N followed a similar order, except grassland and woodland effects were reversed. Root-zone enrichment provided an integrated soil-profile assessment and a more targeted response of soil organic C and N change than did more traditional paired land use approaches, primarily due to separation of a variable pedogenic influence among sites. These point-in-time results gave a clear indication that conservation agricultural management approaches will foster surface soil organic C and N restoration across a diversity of soil types in the southeastern United States.","PeriodicalId":50049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","volume":"20 1","pages":"124 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2023.00064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Agriculture is a globally dominating land use, so efforts to restore soil organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) lost through historical degradation could have enormous benefits to production and the environment, particularly by storing an organic reserve of nutrients in soil and avoiding the return of a small portion of biologically cycling C to the atmosphere. Estimates of soil organic C and N storage from conservation agricultural management are still limited when considered in proportion to the large diversity of environmental and edaphic conditions. A study was undertaken to determine the total, baseline, and root-zone enrichment stocks of soil organic C and N as affected by land use on 25 research stations distributed throughout North Carolina. Root-zone enrichment of organic matter is that portion influenced by contemporary management, and baseline is that portion dominated by pedogenesis. These fractions were compared with more traditional estimation procedures. Soil organic C and N were strongly negatively associated with sand concentration. Although physiographic region influenced overall soil C and N contents, variations in soil type and research station management within a region were equally influential. Soil organic C and N stocks were strongly affected by land use, which did not interact with the soil textural effect. Across the 25 research station locations, root-zone enrichment of soil organic C followed the order (p < 0.01) conventional-till cropland (11.1 Mg C ha−1) < no-till cropland (21.5 Mg C ha−1) < grassland (29.6 Mg C ha−1) < woodland (38.6 Mg C ha−1). Root-zone enrichment of total soil N followed a similar order, except grassland and woodland effects were reversed. Root-zone enrichment provided an integrated soil-profile assessment and a more targeted response of soil organic C and N change than did more traditional paired land use approaches, primarily due to separation of a variable pedogenic influence among sites. These point-in-time results gave a clear indication that conservation agricultural management approaches will foster surface soil organic C and N restoration across a diversity of soil types in the southeastern United States.
农业是全球占主导地位的土地利用方式,因此,恢复因历史退化而损失的土壤有机碳(C)和氮(N)的努力可能对生产和环境产生巨大效益,特别是通过在土壤中储存有机营养储备,避免一小部分生物循环碳返回大气。考虑到环境和土壤条件的巨大多样性,保护性农业管理对土壤有机碳和氮储量的估计仍然有限。在北卡罗莱纳州分布的25个研究站进行了一项研究,以确定受土地利用影响的土壤有机碳和氮的总量、基线和根区富集储量。根区有机质富集是受当代管理影响的部分,基线是受成土作用主导的部分。将这些分数与更传统的估计程序进行比较。土壤有机碳、氮与沙粒浓度呈显著负相关。虽然地理区域影响土壤总体碳氮含量,但区域内土壤类型和研究站管理的差异同样具有影响。土壤有机碳氮储量受土地利用方式的影响较大,但与土壤质地效应不存在交互作用。在25个研究站中,根区土壤有机碳的富集程度依次为(p < 0.01)常规耕作农田(11.1 Mg C ha−1)<免耕农田(21.5 Mg C ha−1)<草地(29.6 Mg C ha−1)<林地(38.6 Mg C ha−1)。根区土壤全氮的富集顺序相似,但草地和林地的影响相反。与传统的成对土地利用方法相比,根区富集提供了一个综合的土壤剖面评估和对土壤有机碳和氮变化的更有针对性的响应,主要是由于不同地点之间的可变成土影响分离。这些时间点的结果清楚地表明,保护性农业管理方法将促进美国东南部多种土壤类型的表层土壤有机碳和氮的恢复。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (JSWC) is a multidisciplinary journal of natural resource conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. The journal has two sections: the A Section containing various departments and features, and the Research Section containing peer-reviewed research papers.