DRY NEEDLING WITH AND WITHOUT PARASPINAL NEEDLING IN PATIENTS WITH ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS. A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

IF 0.1 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS International Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.15621/IJPHY/2020/V7I6/837
Varun Kalia, S. Mani
{"title":"DRY NEEDLING WITH AND WITHOUT PARASPINAL NEEDLING IN PATIENTS WITH ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS. A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL","authors":"Varun Kalia, S. Mani","doi":"10.15621/IJPHY/2020/V7I6/837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Adhesive Capsulitis (AC) of the shoulder joint is a chronic disabling musculoskeletal condition affecting 2% to 5.3% of the world's general population. It results in pain, restricted ROM, impaired myofascial kinetics due to fibrosis of capsules and ligaments. Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) that could further restrict shoulder movements by inducing girdle muscle tightness. MTrP dry needling (MDN) intervention and other conservative therapies in subjects with AC of the shoulder would enhance the clinical outcome. However, insufficient evidence available to support the local MDN with paraspinal dry needling (PSDN) for the AC management. The study's objective is to evaluate the efficacy of local MDN with and without PSDN in AC patients. Methods: A total of 210 (98 male, 112 female) clinically diagnosed subjects with AC were recruited from a multi-specialty hospital and then randomly assigned to one of three groups. G1: Local MDN group (n=70) G2: Local MDN with PSDN group (n=70) G3: Conventional physiotherapy group (n=70). The outcome measures included pain intensity (VAS), shoulder ROMs (Goniometer), disability (SPADI), and pressure pain threshold (pressure algometer) were assessed at baseline and 12th day of the intervention. Results: The statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in all shoulder ROMs (except lateral rotation), pain intensity, SPADI, and PPT in “G1” and “G2” compared to “G3” but no significant difference in between “G1” and “G2”. Conclusion: Local MDN is an effective treatment technique and conventional physiotherapy intervention, but PSDN does not have an additive effect on outcome measures in AC subjects.","PeriodicalId":42989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15621/IJPHY/2020/V7I6/837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adhesive Capsulitis (AC) of the shoulder joint is a chronic disabling musculoskeletal condition affecting 2% to 5.3% of the world's general population. It results in pain, restricted ROM, impaired myofascial kinetics due to fibrosis of capsules and ligaments. Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) that could further restrict shoulder movements by inducing girdle muscle tightness. MTrP dry needling (MDN) intervention and other conservative therapies in subjects with AC of the shoulder would enhance the clinical outcome. However, insufficient evidence available to support the local MDN with paraspinal dry needling (PSDN) for the AC management. The study's objective is to evaluate the efficacy of local MDN with and without PSDN in AC patients. Methods: A total of 210 (98 male, 112 female) clinically diagnosed subjects with AC were recruited from a multi-specialty hospital and then randomly assigned to one of three groups. G1: Local MDN group (n=70) G2: Local MDN with PSDN group (n=70) G3: Conventional physiotherapy group (n=70). The outcome measures included pain intensity (VAS), shoulder ROMs (Goniometer), disability (SPADI), and pressure pain threshold (pressure algometer) were assessed at baseline and 12th day of the intervention. Results: The statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in all shoulder ROMs (except lateral rotation), pain intensity, SPADI, and PPT in “G1” and “G2” compared to “G3” but no significant difference in between “G1” and “G2”. Conclusion: Local MDN is an effective treatment technique and conventional physiotherapy intervention, but PSDN does not have an additive effect on outcome measures in AC subjects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干法针刺伴和不伴椎旁针刺对粘连性囊炎患者的影响。一项随机临床试验
背景:肩关节的粘连性囊炎(AC)是一种慢性致残性肌肉骨骼疾病,影响世界总人口的2%至5.3%。它导致疼痛,活动受限,由于囊和韧带纤维化导致的肌筋膜动力学受损。肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs)可通过诱导腰带肌紧致进一步限制肩部运动。MTrP干针(MDN)干预和其他保守治疗可以提高肩部AC患者的临床疗效。然而,没有足够的证据支持椎旁干针(PSDN)治疗局部MDN。该研究的目的是评估伴有和不伴有PSDN的局部MDN在AC患者中的疗效。方法:从某多专科医院招募临床诊断为AC的患者210例(男98例,女112例),随机分为3组。G1:局部MDN组(n=70) G2:局部MDN合并PSDN组(n=70) G3:常规物理治疗组(n=70)。结果测量包括疼痛强度(VAS),肩部ROMs(角计),残疾(SPADI)和压力疼痛阈值(压力疼痛计)在基线和干预的第12天进行评估。结果:与G3组相比,G1组和G2组肩关节rom(除侧旋外)、疼痛强度、SPADI、PPT改善均有统计学意义(p < 0.05), G1组和G2组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:局部MDN是一种有效的治疗技术和常规物理治疗干预措施,但PSDN对AC受试者的结局指标没有加性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Mc Gill Pain Questionnaire: A Cross-Cultural Adaptation Study in Chronic Neck Pain" "Incidence of Lower Limb Lymphedema in Post therapeutic Gynaecological Malignancies" "Comparative Effect of Modified Constraint Induced Movement Therapy, Proprioceptive Training and Task-Oriented Training on Functions of Upper Extremity among Stroke Patients" "Risk-Taking and Risk of Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review" "Correlation of Self-Reported and Performance-Based Measures In Patients With Non-Traumatic Stiff Shoulder Pathologies: An Observational Study"
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1