The Role of Determinism in the Prediction of Corrosion Damage

D. Macdonald
{"title":"The Role of Determinism in the Prediction of Corrosion Damage","authors":"D. Macdonald","doi":"10.3390/cmd4020013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the roles of empiricism and determinism in science and concludes that the intellectual exercise that we call “science” is best described as the transition from empiricism (i.e., observation) to determinism, which is the philosophy that the future can be predicted from the past based on the natural laws that are condensations of all previous scientific knowledge. This transition (i.e., “science”) is accomplished by formulating theories to explain the observations and models that are based on those theories to predict new phenomena. Thus, models are the computational arms of theories, and all models must possess a theoretical basis, but not all theories need to predict. The structure of a deterministic model is reviewed, and it is emphasized that all models must contain an input, a model engine, and an output, together with a feedback loop that permits the continual updating of the model parameters and a means of assessing predictions against new observations. This latter feature facilitates the application of the “scientific method” of cyclical prediction/assessment that continues until the model can no longer account for new observations. At that point, the model (and possibly the theory, too) has been “falsified” and must be discarded and a new theory/model constructed. In this regard, it is important to stress that no amount of successful prediction can prove a theory/model to be “correct”, because theories and models are merely the figments of our imagination as developed through imperfect senses and imperfect intellect and, hence, are invariably wrong at some level of detail. Contrariwise, a single failure of a model to predict an observation invalidates (“falsifies”) the theory/model. The impediment to model building is complexity and its impact on model building is discussed. Thus, we employ instruments such as microscopes and telescopes to extend our senses to examining smaller and larger objects, respectively, just as we now employ computers to extend our intellects as reflected in our computational prowess. The process of model building is illustrated with reference to the deterministic Coupled Environment Fracture Model (CEFM) that has proven to be highly successful in predicting crack growth rate in metals and alloys in contact with high-temperature aqueous environments of the type that exist in water-cooled nuclear power reactor primary coolant circuits.","PeriodicalId":10693,"journal":{"name":"Corrosion and Materials Degradation","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrosion and Materials Degradation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmd4020013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper explores the roles of empiricism and determinism in science and concludes that the intellectual exercise that we call “science” is best described as the transition from empiricism (i.e., observation) to determinism, which is the philosophy that the future can be predicted from the past based on the natural laws that are condensations of all previous scientific knowledge. This transition (i.e., “science”) is accomplished by formulating theories to explain the observations and models that are based on those theories to predict new phenomena. Thus, models are the computational arms of theories, and all models must possess a theoretical basis, but not all theories need to predict. The structure of a deterministic model is reviewed, and it is emphasized that all models must contain an input, a model engine, and an output, together with a feedback loop that permits the continual updating of the model parameters and a means of assessing predictions against new observations. This latter feature facilitates the application of the “scientific method” of cyclical prediction/assessment that continues until the model can no longer account for new observations. At that point, the model (and possibly the theory, too) has been “falsified” and must be discarded and a new theory/model constructed. In this regard, it is important to stress that no amount of successful prediction can prove a theory/model to be “correct”, because theories and models are merely the figments of our imagination as developed through imperfect senses and imperfect intellect and, hence, are invariably wrong at some level of detail. Contrariwise, a single failure of a model to predict an observation invalidates (“falsifies”) the theory/model. The impediment to model building is complexity and its impact on model building is discussed. Thus, we employ instruments such as microscopes and telescopes to extend our senses to examining smaller and larger objects, respectively, just as we now employ computers to extend our intellects as reflected in our computational prowess. The process of model building is illustrated with reference to the deterministic Coupled Environment Fracture Model (CEFM) that has proven to be highly successful in predicting crack growth rate in metals and alloys in contact with high-temperature aqueous environments of the type that exist in water-cooled nuclear power reactor primary coolant circuits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决定论在腐蚀损伤预测中的作用
本文探讨了经验主义和决定论在科学中的作用,并得出结论,我们称之为“科学”的智力活动最好被描述为从经验主义(即观察)到决定论的过渡,决定论是一种哲学,认为未来可以根据自然规律从过去预测,而自然规律是以前所有科学知识的凝聚。这种转变(即“科学”)是通过制定理论来解释观察和模型来完成的,这些理论是基于这些理论来预测新现象的。因此,模型是理论的计算武器,所有模型都必须具有理论基础,但并非所有理论都需要预测。本文回顾了确定性模型的结构,并强调所有模型必须包含输入、模型引擎和输出,以及允许模型参数持续更新的反馈回路和根据新观测评估预测的方法。后一种特征有助于周期性预测/评估的“科学方法”的应用,这种方法一直持续到模型无法再解释新的观测结果为止。在这一点上,模型(也可能是理论)已经被“证伪”,必须被抛弃,并建立一个新的理论/模型。在这方面,重要的是要强调,没有多少成功的预测可以证明一个理论/模型是“正确的”,因为理论和模型仅仅是我们通过不完善的感官和不完善的智力发展起来的想象力的虚构,因此,在某些细节层面上总是错误的。相反,一个模型预测一次观测的一次失败就会使理论/模型失效(“证伪”)。模型建立的障碍是复杂性,并讨论了复杂性对模型建立的影响。因此,我们使用诸如显微镜和望远镜之类的仪器来扩展我们的感官,分别检查更小和更大的物体,就像我们现在使用计算机来扩展我们的智力一样,这反映在我们的计算能力上。模型的建立过程以确定性耦合环境断裂模型(CEFM)为例进行说明,该模型已被证明在预测与水冷核反应堆一次冷却剂回路中存在的高温水环境接触的金属和合金的裂纹扩展速率方面非常成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Isothermal Annealing in the 600 to 750 °C Range on the Degradation of SAF 2205 Duplex Stainless Steel Unraveling the Corrosion of the Ti–6Al–4V Orthopedic Alloy in Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) Solution: Influence of Frequency and Potential Impact of the Delay Period between Electrochemical Hydrogen Charging and Tensile Testing on the Mechanical Properties of Mild Steel Mechanistic Analysis of Hydrogen Evolution Reaction on Stationary Polycrystalline Gold Electrodes in H2SO4 Solutions In-Situ AFM Studies of Surfactant Adsorption on Stainless Steel Surfaces during Electrochemical Polarization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1