Intensionality, compositionality, and nominativity in information system development

M. Nikitchenko
{"title":"Intensionality, compositionality, and nominativity in information system development","authors":"M. Nikitchenko","doi":"10.1109/INTELCIS.2015.7397186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given. Process of information system development consists of several phases including, in particular, system analysis, specification, design, and implementation. Each of these phases is based on some abstractions that can be roughly divided into two groups of general and specific abstractions respectively. In this talk we address to such general abstractions as intensionality, compositionality, and nominativity. Intensionality is understood in the traditional sense as a counterpart to extensionality that together complete each other and define the main aspects of notions in their integrity. Compositionality means that a system is constructed of smaller subsystems with the help of special construction operations called compositions. Nominativity emphasizes the importance of naming relations for system aspects description. We analyze and illustrate the use of the above mentioned abstractions in different phases of system development. Considering conventional mathematical formalisms we admit that they are based on the extensionality principle that restricts and complicates usage of such formalisms in system development. Therefore we construct formal mathematical structures based on the principles of intensionality, compositionality, and nominativity. These structures can be considered generalizations of traditional notions of algebras and logics for classes of \"dynamic\" data and functions. Introduction of such formalisms permits us to define also a special kind of intensionalized computability that better reflects specifics of executable components of information systems. We compare the constructed formalisms with the existing ones and demonstrate that they a rather expressive and more adequate for information system development.","PeriodicalId":6478,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS)","volume":"34 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTELCIS.2015.7397186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary form only given. Process of information system development consists of several phases including, in particular, system analysis, specification, design, and implementation. Each of these phases is based on some abstractions that can be roughly divided into two groups of general and specific abstractions respectively. In this talk we address to such general abstractions as intensionality, compositionality, and nominativity. Intensionality is understood in the traditional sense as a counterpart to extensionality that together complete each other and define the main aspects of notions in their integrity. Compositionality means that a system is constructed of smaller subsystems with the help of special construction operations called compositions. Nominativity emphasizes the importance of naming relations for system aspects description. We analyze and illustrate the use of the above mentioned abstractions in different phases of system development. Considering conventional mathematical formalisms we admit that they are based on the extensionality principle that restricts and complicates usage of such formalisms in system development. Therefore we construct formal mathematical structures based on the principles of intensionality, compositionality, and nominativity. These structures can be considered generalizations of traditional notions of algebras and logics for classes of "dynamic" data and functions. Introduction of such formalisms permits us to define also a special kind of intensionalized computability that better reflects specifics of executable components of information systems. We compare the constructed formalisms with the existing ones and demonstrate that they a rather expressive and more adequate for information system development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息系统开发中的集约性、组合性和主体性
只提供摘要形式。信息系统开发过程包括几个阶段,特别是系统分析、规范、设计和实现。这些阶段中的每一个都基于一些抽象,这些抽象可以大致分为两组,分别是一般抽象和特定抽象。在这次演讲中,我们将讨论诸如密集性、组合性和主性等一般抽象概念。在传统意义上,密集性被理解为外延性的对应物,它们共同完成彼此,并在其完整性中定义概念的主要方面。组合性意味着系统是由较小的子系统在称为组合的特殊构造操作的帮助下构造的。命名性强调命名关系对系统方面描述的重要性。我们分析并说明了上述抽象在系统开发的不同阶段的使用。考虑到传统的数学形式,我们承认它们是基于可扩展性原则的,这限制了系统开发中这种形式的使用并使其复杂化。因此,我们基于密集性、组合性和主性原则来构建形式化的数学结构。这些结构可以被认为是“动态”数据和函数类的代数和逻辑的传统概念的推广。这种形式化的引入允许我们定义一种特殊类型的强化可计算性,它更好地反映了信息系统可执行组件的具体情况。我们将构造的形式化与现有的形式化进行比较,并证明它们更具有表现力,更适合于信息系统开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the use of probabilistic model-checking for the verification of prognostics applications Prospective, knowledge based clinical risk analysis: The OPT-model Partial deduction in predicate calculus as a tool for artificial intelligence problem complexity decreasing XML summarization: A survey Finding the pin in the haystack: A Bot Traceback service for public clouds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1