Between hope and expectation: understanding ordinary ex-combatant agency in Sierra Leone’s TRC

IF 1.1 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Conflict Security & Development Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1080/14678802.2022.2059935
Sayra van den Berg
{"title":"Between hope and expectation: understanding ordinary ex-combatant agency in Sierra Leone’s TRC","authors":"Sayra van den Berg","doi":"10.1080/14678802.2022.2059935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article empirically deepens understandings of the relationship between everyday ex-combatants and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in Sierra Leone. It asks, what are the agentic implications of this victim-centred model of justice among its designated perpetrators (everyday or ordinary ex-combatants)? This article advances criticisms against the participatory limitations of the victim-centred model of justice in truth commissions. It applies the concept of friction to analyse the theft of agency produced by Sierra Leone’s TRC among everyday ex-combatants. It analyses the contradictions between everyday ex-combatant hopes for the TRC against institutional expectations set for this population to reveal the agentic effects of this sticky engagement. In so doing, this article exposes the agentic theft produced by compound frictions which interact to deny agency among those designated as perpetrators by the material engagement and frictional travels of transitional justice. It argues that the primacy placed on the restoration of victims’ dignity within truth commissions comes at a particularly heavy cost for the population of everyday ex-combatants, who experience multiple processes of exclusion as a result.","PeriodicalId":46301,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Security & Development","volume":"8 1","pages":"119 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Security & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2022.2059935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article empirically deepens understandings of the relationship between everyday ex-combatants and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) in Sierra Leone. It asks, what are the agentic implications of this victim-centred model of justice among its designated perpetrators (everyday or ordinary ex-combatants)? This article advances criticisms against the participatory limitations of the victim-centred model of justice in truth commissions. It applies the concept of friction to analyse the theft of agency produced by Sierra Leone’s TRC among everyday ex-combatants. It analyses the contradictions between everyday ex-combatant hopes for the TRC against institutional expectations set for this population to reveal the agentic effects of this sticky engagement. In so doing, this article exposes the agentic theft produced by compound frictions which interact to deny agency among those designated as perpetrators by the material engagement and frictional travels of transitional justice. It argues that the primacy placed on the restoration of victims’ dignity within truth commissions comes at a particularly heavy cost for the population of everyday ex-combatants, who experience multiple processes of exclusion as a result.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在希望与期望之间:了解塞拉利昂共和共和国的普通前战斗人员机构
本文通过实证加深了对塞拉利昂前战斗人员与真相与和解委员会(TRC)之间关系的理解。它问,这种以受害者为中心的司法模式对其指定的肇事者(日常或普通的前战斗人员)的实际影响是什么?本文对真相委员会中以受害者为中心的司法模式的参与性限制提出了批评。它运用摩擦的概念来分析塞拉利昂的TRC在日常前战斗人员中产生的盗窃行为。它分析了前战斗人员对TRC的日常希望与对这一人口的机构期望之间的矛盾,以揭示这种粘性接触的实际影响。通过这样做,本文揭示了由复合摩擦产生的代理盗窃,这些摩擦相互作用,通过物质接触和过渡司法的摩擦旅行来否认被指定为肇事者的代理。它认为,真相委员会将恢复受害者的尊严放在首位,这对日常的前战斗人员来说代价特别沉重,他们因此经历了多次被排斥的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conflict Security & Development
Conflict Security & Development INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
From snapshots to panoramas: navigating power, space, and time in the study of armed groups Natural bedfellows: corruption, criminality and the failure of international reconstruction. A case study of the Kabul Bank Elites and arbitrary power: ethical challenges and guiding principles for research with violent political actors Transitional justice interventions in Sri Lanka: why do they keep failing? ‘This is the fate of Libyan women:’ contempt, ridicule, and indifference of Seham Sergiwa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1