THE CONCEPT OF LIMITED LIABILITY AND THE PLIGHT OF CREDITORS WITHIN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND COMPANY LAW: A UK PERSPECTIVE

Q3 Social Sciences InterEULawEast Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.22598/iele.2018.5.2.11
Eneless Nyoni, T. Hart
{"title":"THE CONCEPT OF LIMITED LIABILITY AND THE PLIGHT OF CREDITORS WITHIN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND COMPANY LAW: A UK PERSPECTIVE","authors":"Eneless Nyoni, T. Hart","doi":"10.22598/iele.2018.5.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this paper is to analyze the effects of shareholder primacy governance on creditors, the characteristics of the firm, and how creditors can protect themselves. The governance of the firm is legally vested on directors and the law places on them specific duties requiring them to act in a certain way to promote the success of the company. The governance of the firm has evolved to be known as corporate governance. The mode of corporate governance such as the shareholder oriented governance and the characteristics that come with the firm (legal personality and limited liability) have negative implications on creditors. Shareholder primacy model of corporate governance seems to find its support from the Companies Act so does limited liability which limits the liability of the Members to the subscribed shares. Legal personality of the firm means that the firm is a juristic person with rights and obligations of a natural person in that it can own its own property. The presence of limited liability brings about the shareholder primacy model of governance. The problem is not the shareholders but the foundation on which they find there protection which is the law. With the presence of the above concepts, the implication on creditors is higher risk. This paper argues that if creditors’ interests are taken into account from inception, creditors will be better protected as they would be an ongoing concern for the company. Although the law provides circumstances when the corporate veil can be pierced as a mechanism to protect creditors, it is argued in this paper that clear and concise rules must be put in place as to when the veil can be pieced. * Post graduate researcher at University of Huddersfield; Eneless.Nyoni@hud.ac.uk ** Principle lecturer, School of Law University of Huddersfield; T.S.Hart@hud.ac.uk Intereulaweast, Vol. V (2) 2018 310 This paper contributes to literature on the protection of creditors in light of limited liability and within corporate governance. It also makes recommendations to change the law thereby contributing to policy makers to include creditors when governing the firm. The article uses the doctrinal approach to analyze the law on the protection of creditors by a critical examination of the section 172(1) and section 830 of the Companies Act.","PeriodicalId":52280,"journal":{"name":"InterEULawEast","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterEULawEast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2018.5.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The focus of this paper is to analyze the effects of shareholder primacy governance on creditors, the characteristics of the firm, and how creditors can protect themselves. The governance of the firm is legally vested on directors and the law places on them specific duties requiring them to act in a certain way to promote the success of the company. The governance of the firm has evolved to be known as corporate governance. The mode of corporate governance such as the shareholder oriented governance and the characteristics that come with the firm (legal personality and limited liability) have negative implications on creditors. Shareholder primacy model of corporate governance seems to find its support from the Companies Act so does limited liability which limits the liability of the Members to the subscribed shares. Legal personality of the firm means that the firm is a juristic person with rights and obligations of a natural person in that it can own its own property. The presence of limited liability brings about the shareholder primacy model of governance. The problem is not the shareholders but the foundation on which they find there protection which is the law. With the presence of the above concepts, the implication on creditors is higher risk. This paper argues that if creditors’ interests are taken into account from inception, creditors will be better protected as they would be an ongoing concern for the company. Although the law provides circumstances when the corporate veil can be pierced as a mechanism to protect creditors, it is argued in this paper that clear and concise rules must be put in place as to when the veil can be pieced. * Post graduate researcher at University of Huddersfield; Eneless.Nyoni@hud.ac.uk ** Principle lecturer, School of Law University of Huddersfield; T.S.Hart@hud.ac.uk Intereulaweast, Vol. V (2) 2018 310 This paper contributes to literature on the protection of creditors in light of limited liability and within corporate governance. It also makes recommendations to change the law thereby contributing to policy makers to include creditors when governing the firm. The article uses the doctrinal approach to analyze the law on the protection of creditors by a critical examination of the section 172(1) and section 830 of the Companies Act.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有限责任的概念和债权人在公司治理和公司法中的困境:一个英国的视角
本文的重点是分析股东优先治理对债权人的影响、公司的特点以及债权人如何保护自己。公司的治理在法律上被赋予董事,法律赋予他们特定的职责,要求他们以某种方式促进公司的成功。公司的治理已经演变为公司治理。公司治理模式(如股东导向治理)和公司特征(法人人格和有限责任)对债权人有负面影响。股东至上的公司治理模式似乎得到了公司法的支持,有限责任制度也得到了公司法的支持,有限责任制度限制了股东对认购股份的责任。企业法人资格是指企业具有自然人的权利义务,可以拥有自己的财产。有限责任的存在带来了股东至上的治理模式。问题不在于股东,而在于他们赖以获得保护的基础,即法律。由于上述概念的存在,对债权人的影响是更高的风险。本文认为,如果从一开始就考虑到债权人的利益,债权人将得到更好的保护,因为他们将是公司持续关注的问题。尽管法律规定了公司面纱可以被戳破的情况,作为一种保护债权人的机制,但本文认为,对于何时可以揭开面纱,必须制定明确而简洁的规则。*哈德斯菲尔德大学研究生研究员;Eneless.Nyoni@hud.ac.uk **哈德斯菲尔德大学法学院首席讲师;T.S.Hart@hud.ac.uk Intereulaweast, Vol. V(2) 2018 310本文对有限责任和公司治理下债权人保护的文献进行了贡献。它还提出了修改法律的建议,从而有助于决策者在管理公司时将债权人包括在内。本文通过对《公司法》第172(1)条和第830条的严格审查,运用理论方法分析了有关债权人保护的法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
InterEULawEast
InterEULawEast Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
DYNAMIC INDUSTRIES REQUIRE A DYNAMIC APPROACH TO LAW? ON THE ILLUMINAGRAIL TAKEOVER THE DIGITAL ECONOMY AND LEGAL CHALLENGES DIGITAL RIGHTS IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM REMITTANCES ARE THE MAIN INDICATORS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE WESTERN BALKANS THE IMPACT OF THE ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND UKRAINE ON MUTUAL TRADE AND UKRAINIAN PORTS CARGO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1