Issues to Consider Before Asserting A Software Patent

IF 0.7 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Technology and Innovation Pub Date : 2020-08-29 DOI:10.21300/21.3.2020.205
M. Greenbaum, S. Herrman
{"title":"Issues to Consider Before Asserting A Software Patent","authors":"M. Greenbaum, S. Herrman","doi":"10.21300/21.3.2020.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software patents have garnered a lot of attention in recent years due, at least in part, to the proliferation of software-enabled devices, such as smartphones and tablets, and the use of software to control a range of devices from automobiles to kitchen appliances. Enforcement of software\n patents involves unique legal issues that should be considered before asserting a patent against an accused infringer. A primary issue to consider is whether the patent claims are still patent-eligible under recent changes in the law. Also, certain types of software patents are vulnerable\n to attack in U.S. Patent Office proceedings, but these proceedings are not available unless the patent owner takes step to provoke them. In addition, software inventions are often implemented as method patents, which have unique requirements and restrictions that should be considered. For\n example, steps of a method patent must all be performed by an accused infringer in the United States and must all be performed by the same entity (or under the direction or control of that entity). Where a software invention is not implemented as a method patent, pre-suit damages may not be\n available unless the patentee's own products are properly marked with the patent number, and software has very different requirements for marking than more tangible products. A careful consideration of each of these issues is essential before moving forward with a lawsuit.","PeriodicalId":44009,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Innovation","volume":"4 1","pages":"205-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21300/21.3.2020.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Software patents have garnered a lot of attention in recent years due, at least in part, to the proliferation of software-enabled devices, such as smartphones and tablets, and the use of software to control a range of devices from automobiles to kitchen appliances. Enforcement of software patents involves unique legal issues that should be considered before asserting a patent against an accused infringer. A primary issue to consider is whether the patent claims are still patent-eligible under recent changes in the law. Also, certain types of software patents are vulnerable to attack in U.S. Patent Office proceedings, but these proceedings are not available unless the patent owner takes step to provoke them. In addition, software inventions are often implemented as method patents, which have unique requirements and restrictions that should be considered. For example, steps of a method patent must all be performed by an accused infringer in the United States and must all be performed by the same entity (or under the direction or control of that entity). Where a software invention is not implemented as a method patent, pre-suit damages may not be available unless the patentee's own products are properly marked with the patent number, and software has very different requirements for marking than more tangible products. A careful consideration of each of these issues is essential before moving forward with a lawsuit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主张软件专利之前要考虑的问题
近年来,软件专利获得了很多关注,至少部分原因是智能手机和平板电脑等软件设备的激增,以及软件用于控制从汽车到厨房电器等一系列设备。软件专利的执行涉及独特的法律问题,在对被指控的侵权者主张专利之前应该考虑这些问题。要考虑的一个主要问题是,根据最近法律的变化,专利权利要求是否仍然具有专利资格。此外,某些类型的软件专利在美国专利局的诉讼程序中很容易受到攻击,但除非专利所有者采取措施激怒他们,否则这些诉讼程序是不可用的。此外,软件发明往往以方法专利的形式实施,方法专利具有独特的要求和限制,需要加以考虑。例如,方法专利的所有步骤都必须由美国的被指控侵权人执行,并且必须由同一实体执行(或在该实体的指导或控制下)。软件发明不作为方法专利实施的,除非专利权人自己的产品正确地标注了专利号,否则不能获得诉前损害赔偿,而软件的标注要求与更有形的产品有很大的不同。在提起诉讼之前,仔细考虑这些问题是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Technology and Innovation
Technology and Innovation MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
VA TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROGRAM RESPONDS TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER ASSISTANCE PROJECT BRINGS VA HEALTH CARE IDEAS TO LIFE. On Capital, Innovation, and Government Innovative Infrared Heating Technologies for Food and Agricultural Processing Journeys of Innovation: Positively Connected
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1