Knowledge Organisers for learning: Examples, non-examples and concept maps in university mathematics

IF 5.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Stem Education Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3934/steme.2023008
I. Jeong, T. Evans
{"title":"Knowledge Organisers for learning: Examples, non-examples and concept maps in university mathematics","authors":"I. Jeong, T. Evans","doi":"10.3934/steme.2023008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Finding effective ways to engage students in sense-making while learning is one of the central challenges discussed in mathematics education literature. One of the big issues is the prevalence of summative assessment tasks prompting students to demonstrate procedural knowledge only, which is a common problem at the tertiary level. In this study, in a large university classroom setting (N = 355), an instructional innovation was designed, developed, implemented and evaluated involving novel tasks–Knowledge Organisers. The tasks comprised prompts for students to generate examples/non-examples and construct a concept map of the key mathematical concepts in the course. The initiative's design was based on the current understanding of human cognitive architecture. A concept map is a visualisation of a group of related abstract concepts with their relationships identified by connections using directed arrows, which can be viewed as an externalisation of a schema stored in a learner's long-term memory. As such, we argue for a distinction between a local conceptual understanding (e.g., example space) versus a global conceptual understanding, manifesting through a high-quality concept map linking a group of related concepts. By utilising a mixed-methods approach and triangulation of the findings from qualitative and quantitative analyses, we were able to discern critical aspects pertaining to the feasibility of implementation and evaluate learners' perceptions. Students' performance on concept mapping is positively correlated with their perceptions of the novel tasks and the time spent completing them. Qualitative analysis showed that students' perceptions are demonstrably insightful about the key mechanisms that supposedly make the tasks beneficial to their learning. Based on the results of the data analyses and their theoretical interpretations, we propose pedagogical strategies for the effective use of Knowledge Organisers.","PeriodicalId":48581,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stem Education","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stem Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2023008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Finding effective ways to engage students in sense-making while learning is one of the central challenges discussed in mathematics education literature. One of the big issues is the prevalence of summative assessment tasks prompting students to demonstrate procedural knowledge only, which is a common problem at the tertiary level. In this study, in a large university classroom setting (N = 355), an instructional innovation was designed, developed, implemented and evaluated involving novel tasks–Knowledge Organisers. The tasks comprised prompts for students to generate examples/non-examples and construct a concept map of the key mathematical concepts in the course. The initiative's design was based on the current understanding of human cognitive architecture. A concept map is a visualisation of a group of related abstract concepts with their relationships identified by connections using directed arrows, which can be viewed as an externalisation of a schema stored in a learner's long-term memory. As such, we argue for a distinction between a local conceptual understanding (e.g., example space) versus a global conceptual understanding, manifesting through a high-quality concept map linking a group of related concepts. By utilising a mixed-methods approach and triangulation of the findings from qualitative and quantitative analyses, we were able to discern critical aspects pertaining to the feasibility of implementation and evaluate learners' perceptions. Students' performance on concept mapping is positively correlated with their perceptions of the novel tasks and the time spent completing them. Qualitative analysis showed that students' perceptions are demonstrably insightful about the key mechanisms that supposedly make the tasks beneficial to their learning. Based on the results of the data analyses and their theoretical interpretations, we propose pedagogical strategies for the effective use of Knowledge Organisers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识组织者学习:例子,非例子和概念图在大学数学
在数学教育文献中讨论的核心挑战之一是,找到有效的方法让学生在学习过程中参与意义建构。其中一个大问题是总结性评估任务的盛行,促使学生只展示程序性知识,这是高等教育的一个普遍问题。在本研究中,在一个大型大学课堂环境中(N = 355),设计、开发、实施和评估了一项涉及新任务的教学创新——知识组织者。任务包括提示学生生成示例/非示例,并构建课程中关键数学概念的概念图。该倡议的设计基于当前对人类认知架构的理解。概念图是一组相关的抽象概念的可视化,它们之间的关系通过有向箭头的连接来确定,这可以被视为存储在学习者长期记忆中的图式的外化。因此,我们主张区分局部概念理解(例如,示例空间)与全局概念理解,通过链接一组相关概念的高质量概念图来表现。通过使用混合方法和对定性和定量分析结果的三角测量,我们能够辨别与实施可行性有关的关键方面,并评估学习者的看法。学生在概念映射上的表现与他们对新任务的感知和完成任务所花费的时间呈正相关。定性分析表明,学生的看法明显深刻的关键机制,据称使任务有利于他们的学习。基于数据分析的结果及其理论解释,我们提出了有效使用知识组织者的教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Stem Education
International Journal of Stem Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.90%
发文量
68
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STEM Education is a multidisciplinary journal in subject-content education that focuses on the study of teaching and learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). It is being established as a brand new, forward looking journal in the field of education. As a peer-reviewed journal, it is positioned to promote research and educational development in the rapidly evolving field of STEM education around the world.
期刊最新文献
The S in STEM: gender differences in science anxiety and its relations with science test performance-related variables The transfer effect of computational thinking (CT)-STEM: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis Exploring instructional design in K-12 STEM education: a systematic literature review Academic social comparison: a promising new target to reduce fear of negative evaluation in large-enrollment college science courses One size doesn’t fit all: how different types of learning motivations influence engineering undergraduate students’ success outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1