Diet vs Sugar-Sweetened Soda Preferences and Attitudes in a Sample of Adolescents~!2010-03-19~!2010-06-07~!2010-08-06~!

Nathaniel Etheridge Frank-White, E. Frank
{"title":"Diet vs Sugar-Sweetened Soda Preferences and Attitudes in a Sample of Adolescents~!2010-03-19~!2010-06-07~!2010-08-06~!","authors":"Nathaniel Etheridge Frank-White, E. Frank","doi":"10.2174/1874309901004010023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"North American adolescents' consumption of sodas is of concern in the face of the obesity epidemic. We wished to determine if their perceptions about sugared and diet sodas were reflected in their blinded preferences. Our n=194, with an average age of 15.2 years, and a response rate of 97%. Among respondents, 3% stated that they strongly preferred diet soda, 3% somewhat preferred diet soda, 37% strongly preferred sugar-sweetened soda, 27% somewhat preferred sugar-sweetened soda, and 30% had no preference between diet and sugar-sweetened soda. The average rating for sugar-sweetened soda was 5.9 vs 5.1 vs diet sodas. The r2 was 0.034 (p=0.73) between actual sugar content and taste rating. Public health campaigns that wish to convert adolescents from sugar-sweetened to diet sodas would do well to lessen adolescents' concerns about health risks of diet sodas, and manufacturers might consider that adolescents seek tastes in soda beyond merely sugar consumption.","PeriodicalId":89037,"journal":{"name":"The open pediatric medicine journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"23-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open pediatric medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874309901004010023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

North American adolescents' consumption of sodas is of concern in the face of the obesity epidemic. We wished to determine if their perceptions about sugared and diet sodas were reflected in their blinded preferences. Our n=194, with an average age of 15.2 years, and a response rate of 97%. Among respondents, 3% stated that they strongly preferred diet soda, 3% somewhat preferred diet soda, 37% strongly preferred sugar-sweetened soda, 27% somewhat preferred sugar-sweetened soda, and 30% had no preference between diet and sugar-sweetened soda. The average rating for sugar-sweetened soda was 5.9 vs 5.1 vs diet sodas. The r2 was 0.034 (p=0.73) between actual sugar content and taste rating. Public health campaigns that wish to convert adolescents from sugar-sweetened to diet sodas would do well to lessen adolescents' concerns about health risks of diet sodas, and manufacturers might consider that adolescents seek tastes in soda beyond merely sugar consumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年饮食与含糖汽水偏好及态度的比较研究2010-03-19 2010-06-07 2010-08-06
面对肥胖的流行,北美青少年对苏打水的消费引起了人们的关注。我们希望确定他们对含糖苏打水和无糖苏打水的看法是否反映在他们的盲目偏好中。我们的n=194,平均年龄15.2岁,有效率为97%。在受访者中,3%的人表示他们非常喜欢无糖苏打水,3%的人比较喜欢无糖苏打水,37%的人非常喜欢含糖苏打水,27%的人比较喜欢含糖苏打水,30%的人对无糖苏打水和含糖苏打水没有偏好。含糖苏打水的平均评分是5.9比5.1比无糖苏打水。实际含糖量与口感评分之间的r2为0.034 (p=0.73)。希望将青少年从含糖苏打水转变为无糖苏打水的公共卫生运动将很好地减轻青少年对无糖苏打水健康风险的担忧,制造商可能会考虑青少年在苏打水中寻求的不仅仅是糖的口味。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma ALK-Negative: About a Rare Pediatric Case Report Children and Coronavirus Infection (Covid-19): What to Tell Children to Avoid Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Simple Virilizing Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: A case Report of Sudanese 46, XY DSD male with G293D variant in CYP21A2 Recurrent Hemolytic Anemia as an Inaugural Manifestation of Wilson Disease in Children: A Case Report Infantile GM1-Gangliosidosis Revealed by Slate-Grey Mongolian Spots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1