Rehabilitation following myocardial infarction: Evaluation of both ‘fast-track’ and low level exercise on both physical and psychological parameters

K.A. Willmer, A. Abraheem, K. Hackett, T. Simpson, J. Buckley, J.A.S. Davis
{"title":"Rehabilitation following myocardial infarction: Evaluation of both ‘fast-track’ and low level exercise on both physical and psychological parameters","authors":"K.A. Willmer,&nbsp;A. Abraheem,&nbsp;K. Hackett,&nbsp;T. Simpson,&nbsp;J. Buckley,&nbsp;J.A.S. Davis","doi":"10.1016/S1362-3265(99)80041-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), anxiety and depression usually occur early after discharge at a time of transition from highly supervised care to little support at home. In 1993 we initiated a ‘fast-track’ programme, starting full cardiac rehabilitation within 14 days of AMI. Retrospectively, we analysed and compared records of the first 100 patients to enter the fast-track programme with the last 100 patients to enter the standard programme (rehabilitation starting 4–6 weeks following AMI) with follow-up of 42 months. Satisfactory records for 90 standard and 93 fast-track patients aged 27–64 years were obtained. Over 90% of patients completed rehabilitation with high satisfaction levels. Ages of both groups were the same (median 51 vs 52 years). Standard rehabilitation commenced 26–176 (median 54) days after AMI and fast-track rehabilitation commenced at 6–38 (median 12) days. No deaths from ischaemic heart disease occurred in either group. Coronary angiography was undertaken in 29 standard and in 30 fast-track patients. Revascularization was undertaken in 19 standard and in 17 fast-track patients. Hospital activity analysis showed that 25 standard and 21 fast-track patients were readmitted under a cardiologist (excluding intervention admissions). Some patients had multiple cardiology readmissions, making 48 episodes in the standard group and 28 in the fast-track group. This observation concurs with our impression that more fast-track patients rehabilitate satisfactorily. This experience shows that patients appreciate and attend early rehabilitation, which appears safe. A randomized controlled trial is planned to assess whether early rehabilitation improves outcomes following AMI and reduces costs of unnecessary admissions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100334,"journal":{"name":"Coronary Health Care","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 178-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1362-3265(99)80041-8","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coronary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1362326599800418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), anxiety and depression usually occur early after discharge at a time of transition from highly supervised care to little support at home. In 1993 we initiated a ‘fast-track’ programme, starting full cardiac rehabilitation within 14 days of AMI. Retrospectively, we analysed and compared records of the first 100 patients to enter the fast-track programme with the last 100 patients to enter the standard programme (rehabilitation starting 4–6 weeks following AMI) with follow-up of 42 months. Satisfactory records for 90 standard and 93 fast-track patients aged 27–64 years were obtained. Over 90% of patients completed rehabilitation with high satisfaction levels. Ages of both groups were the same (median 51 vs 52 years). Standard rehabilitation commenced 26–176 (median 54) days after AMI and fast-track rehabilitation commenced at 6–38 (median 12) days. No deaths from ischaemic heart disease occurred in either group. Coronary angiography was undertaken in 29 standard and in 30 fast-track patients. Revascularization was undertaken in 19 standard and in 17 fast-track patients. Hospital activity analysis showed that 25 standard and 21 fast-track patients were readmitted under a cardiologist (excluding intervention admissions). Some patients had multiple cardiology readmissions, making 48 episodes in the standard group and 28 in the fast-track group. This observation concurs with our impression that more fast-track patients rehabilitate satisfactorily. This experience shows that patients appreciate and attend early rehabilitation, which appears safe. A randomized controlled trial is planned to assess whether early rehabilitation improves outcomes following AMI and reduces costs of unnecessary admissions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肌梗死后的康复:“快速通道”和低水平运动对生理和心理参数的评估
急性心肌梗死(AMI)后,焦虑和抑郁通常发生在出院后早期,从高度监督的护理过渡到很少的家庭支持。1993年,我们启动了一个“快速通道”计划,在急性心肌梗死14天内开始全面的心脏康复。回顾性地,我们分析并比较了前100名进入快速通道方案的患者与后100名进入标准方案(AMI后4-6周开始康复)的患者的记录,随访42个月。标准组90例,快速组93例,年龄27 ~ 64岁。90%以上患者满意率高。两组患者的年龄相同(中位51岁vs中位52岁)。AMI后标准康复开始于26-176天(中位54天),快速康复开始于6-38天(中位12天)。两组均未发生缺血性心脏病死亡。29例标准患者和30例快速通道患者进行了冠状动脉造影。19例标准患者和17例快速通道患者进行了血运重建术。医院活动分析显示,25名标准患者和21名快速通道患者在心脏病专家的指导下再次入院(不包括干预入院)。一些患者有多次心脏病再入院,标准组有48次,快速通道组有28次。这一观察结果与我们的印象一致,即更多的快速通道患者康复满意。这一经验表明,患者欣赏并参加早期康复,这似乎是安全的。计划进行一项随机对照试验,以评估早期康复是否能改善AMI后的预后并减少不必要的住院费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cardiac rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: its effect on ischaemia, functional capacity, and a multivariate index of prognosis Improving outcomes in chronic heart failure Helicobacter pylori relation to acute myocardial infarction in an Iranian sample Continuation and initiation of preventive care in general practice following myocardial infarction On death, dying and not dying
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1