SWAT and HBV models’ response to streamflow estimation in the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia

Belay B. Bizuneh , Mamaru A. Moges , Berhanu G. Sinshaw , Mulu S. Kerebih
{"title":"SWAT and HBV models’ response to streamflow estimation in the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia","authors":"Belay B. Bizuneh ,&nbsp;Mamaru A. Moges ,&nbsp;Berhanu G. Sinshaw ,&nbsp;Mulu S. Kerebih","doi":"10.1016/j.wen.2021.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study aimed to evaluate the SWAT and HBV model’s responses to estimate streamflow in three typical selected watersheds in the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. The evaluation was carried out through simulation of runoff in three watersheds, namely: Gilgel Abay, Anger, and Maybar located in the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. The same calibration and validation period were applied for each watershed model with their respective historical records. The objective function indicates the optimized range of model parameters during the calibration and validation procedure, and it gives a good model response result, which is determined by the recommended performance indicators and hydrograph plots. The HBV and SWAT model’s calibration responds with (NSE = 0.81, NSE = 0.48 and NSE = 0.46) and (NSE = 0.81, NSE = 0.63, NSE = 0.61), respectively for Gilgel Abay, Anger, and Maybar watersheds. The optimized parameters were applied to validate the model using independent historical data. The SWAT and HBV model responses for NSE during the validation period were 0.8, 0.55, and 0.54 and 0.63, 0.45, and 0.34, respectively, for Gilgel Abay, Anger, and Maybe watersheds. An alternative was observed to over and under estimate runoff during stimulation periods in extreme wet and dry periods. Generally, the calibrated and validated hydrograph output result indicates that the model’s responses to too wet and dry conditions were not satisfactory. Therefore, further model refinements for extreme events, including season-based model evaluations that could improve the process representation of rainfall-runoff events, are recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101279,"journal":{"name":"Water-Energy Nexus","volume":"4 ","pages":"Pages 41-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wen.2021.03.001","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water-Energy Nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588912521000047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The study aimed to evaluate the SWAT and HBV model’s responses to estimate streamflow in three typical selected watersheds in the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. The evaluation was carried out through simulation of runoff in three watersheds, namely: Gilgel Abay, Anger, and Maybar located in the upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. The same calibration and validation period were applied for each watershed model with their respective historical records. The objective function indicates the optimized range of model parameters during the calibration and validation procedure, and it gives a good model response result, which is determined by the recommended performance indicators and hydrograph plots. The HBV and SWAT model’s calibration responds with (NSE = 0.81, NSE = 0.48 and NSE = 0.46) and (NSE = 0.81, NSE = 0.63, NSE = 0.61), respectively for Gilgel Abay, Anger, and Maybar watersheds. The optimized parameters were applied to validate the model using independent historical data. The SWAT and HBV model responses for NSE during the validation period were 0.8, 0.55, and 0.54 and 0.63, 0.45, and 0.34, respectively, for Gilgel Abay, Anger, and Maybe watersheds. An alternative was observed to over and under estimate runoff during stimulation periods in extreme wet and dry periods. Generally, the calibrated and validated hydrograph output result indicates that the model’s responses to too wet and dry conditions were not satisfactory. Therefore, further model refinements for extreme events, including season-based model evaluations that could improve the process representation of rainfall-runoff events, are recommended.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SWAT和HBV模型对埃塞俄比亚青尼罗河上游流域流量估算的响应
该研究旨在评估SWAT和HBV模型的响应,以估计埃塞俄比亚青尼罗河上游三个典型流域的流量。通过对位于埃塞俄比亚青尼罗河上游流域的Gilgel Abay、Anger和Maybar三个流域的径流模拟进行评价。每个流域模型都采用相同的校准和验证周期,并具有各自的历史记录。目标函数表明了模型参数在校准和验证过程中的优化范围,并给出了良好的模型响应结果,这是由推荐的性能指标和水文图决定的。对于Gilgel Abay, Anger和Maybar流域,HBV和SWAT模型的校准响应分别为(NSE = 0.81, NSE = 0.48和NSE = 0.46)和(NSE = 0.81, NSE = 0.63, NSE = 0.61)。将优化后的参数应用于独立历史数据验证模型。在验证期内,SWAT和HBV模型对NSE的反应分别为0.8、0.55和0.54,Gilgel Abay、Anger和Maybe流域的反应分别为0.63、0.45和0.34。另一种方法是在极端潮湿和干燥时期的刺激期间高估和低估径流。总体而言,经校准和验证的水文曲线输出结果表明,模型对过湿和过干条件的响应不令人满意。因此,建议进一步改进极端事件的模型,包括基于季节的模型评估,以改善降雨径流事件的过程表示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic feasibility assessment and parameter sensitivity analysis of rainwater harvesting systems in different climatic zones of China Mitigation of nitrogen losses during pig manure management: Impact of manure cleaning technique Editorial Board Overcoming water, sanitation, and hygiene challenges in critical regions of the global community A comprehensive review of production and characterization of biochar for removal of organic pollutants from water and wastewater
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1