Platelet and coagulation hemostasis status in patients with atrial fibrillation depending on warfarin dosing method

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Zaporozhye Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-20 DOI:10.14739/2310-1210.2022.6.263895
M. Kolesnyk, Yа. М. Mykhailovskyi
{"title":"Platelet and coagulation hemostasis status in patients with atrial fibrillation depending on warfarin dosing method","authors":"M. Kolesnyk, Yа. М. Mykhailovskyi","doi":"10.14739/2310-1210.2022.6.263895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim. To evaluate indicators of induced platelet aggregation and D-dimer level in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) depending on the method of warfarin (WF) dosing.\nMaterials and methods. The study involved 110 patients with AF (mean age 68.72 ± 0.79; men – 57, women – 53). Patients with AF were divided into two groups: the main group – 50 patients with AF and genotype-guided dosing method, the control group – 60 patients with AF and traditional dosing method. CYP2C9, CYP4F2, VKORC1 genetic polymorphisms were determined using multiplex real time polymerase chain reaction, D-dimer concentration – by the method of solid-phase enzyme immunoassay; ADP- and epinephrine-induced aggregation indicators – by the method of G. Born.\nResults. The percentage (by 24 %), time (by 3 min 6 s) and rate in 30 s (by 19.5 %/min) of ADP-induced platelet aggregation were significantly lower in patients with AF and genotype-guided WF dosing method. D-dimer concentration in patients of the main and control groups did not differ significantly. However, significantly fewer patients with elevated D-dimer values were registered in the group with genotype-guided WF dosing method compared to the group with traditional dosing method: 0 (0.00 %) vs. 7 (11.67 %) at 500 ng FEU/ml cut-off (χ2 = 4.43, P < 0.05), 1 (2.00 %) vs. 9 (15.00 %) at 390 ng FEU/ml cut-off (χ2 = 4.16, P < 0.05), 0 (0.00 %) vs. 7 (11.67 %) at age-adjusted cut-off (χ2 = 4.43, P < 0.05).\nConclusions. The obtained results may indicate a potentially lower risk of thrombotic events in patients with AF and genotype-guided WF dosing method compared to the group with traditional dosing method, which confirms the benefit of the widespread use of the pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":23832,"journal":{"name":"Zaporozhye Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zaporozhye Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1210.2022.6.263895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim. To evaluate indicators of induced platelet aggregation and D-dimer level in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) depending on the method of warfarin (WF) dosing. Materials and methods. The study involved 110 patients with AF (mean age 68.72 ± 0.79; men – 57, women – 53). Patients with AF were divided into two groups: the main group – 50 patients with AF and genotype-guided dosing method, the control group – 60 patients with AF and traditional dosing method. CYP2C9, CYP4F2, VKORC1 genetic polymorphisms were determined using multiplex real time polymerase chain reaction, D-dimer concentration – by the method of solid-phase enzyme immunoassay; ADP- and epinephrine-induced aggregation indicators – by the method of G. Born. Results. The percentage (by 24 %), time (by 3 min 6 s) and rate in 30 s (by 19.5 %/min) of ADP-induced platelet aggregation were significantly lower in patients with AF and genotype-guided WF dosing method. D-dimer concentration in patients of the main and control groups did not differ significantly. However, significantly fewer patients with elevated D-dimer values were registered in the group with genotype-guided WF dosing method compared to the group with traditional dosing method: 0 (0.00 %) vs. 7 (11.67 %) at 500 ng FEU/ml cut-off (χ2 = 4.43, P < 0.05), 1 (2.00 %) vs. 9 (15.00 %) at 390 ng FEU/ml cut-off (χ2 = 4.16, P < 0.05), 0 (0.00 %) vs. 7 (11.67 %) at age-adjusted cut-off (χ2 = 4.43, P < 0.05). Conclusions. The obtained results may indicate a potentially lower risk of thrombotic events in patients with AF and genotype-guided WF dosing method compared to the group with traditional dosing method, which confirms the benefit of the widespread use of the pharmacogenetic testing in clinical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心房颤动患者血小板和凝血止血状况与华法林给药方法的关系
的目标。评价华法林(WF)给药方式对心房颤动(AF)患者诱导血小板聚集指标及d -二聚体水平的影响。材料和方法。研究纳入110例房颤患者(平均年龄68.72±0.79;男性57岁,女性53岁)。将房颤患者分为两组:主组50例房颤患者采用基因型引导给药方法,对照组60例房颤患者采用传统给药方法。采用多重实时聚合酶链反应测定CYP2C9、CYP4F2、VKORC1基因多态性,采用固相酶免疫分析法测定d-二聚体浓度;用G. born法测定ADP和肾上腺素诱导的聚集指标。adp诱导血小板聚集的百分比(减少24%)、时间(减少3 min 6 s)和30 s内血小板聚集率(减少19.5% /min)在AF患者和基因型引导的WF给药方法中均显著降低。试验组和对照组患者d -二聚体浓度无显著差异。然而,显著减少肺动脉栓塞患者升高值是在集团注册genotype-guided WF计量方法相比与传统计量方法:0(0.00%)和7(11.67%)在封地500 ng / ml截止(χ2 = 4.43,P < 0.05), 1(2.00%)和9(15.00%)在封地390 ng / ml截止(χ2 = 4.16,P < 0.05), 0(0.00%)和7(11.67%)在年龄调整截止(χ2 = 4.43,P < 0.05) .Conclusions。所获得的结果可能表明,与传统给药方法相比,采用基因型引导的WF给药方法的房颤患者发生血栓事件的风险可能更低,这证实了在临床实践中广泛使用药物遗传学检测的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zaporozhye Medical Journal
Zaporozhye Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Interrelations between factors in the development of inflammatory changes in the urinary tract in the comprehensive treatment of patients with urolithiasis The choice of blood transfusion strategy in severe traumatic brain injury Assessment of chronic pain syndrome after laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal plastic surgery in patients with inguinal hernia Laparoscopic Heller’s cardiomyotomy as the main method for treatment of achalasia cardia: an evaluation of treatment results A case of neonatal sepsis, early diagnosis and preventive intensive care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1