Novice Academic Roles: The Value of Collegiate, Attendee-Driven Writing Networks

Q2 Social Sciences International Journal of Doctoral Studies Pub Date : 2021-02-13 DOI:10.28945/4700
Sue Wilson, J. Cutri
{"title":"Novice Academic Roles: The Value of Collegiate, Attendee-Driven Writing Networks","authors":"Sue Wilson, J. Cutri","doi":"10.28945/4700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim/Purpose This particular study aims to contribute to the recent scholarly inquiry of doctoral student identity work within collegiate, attendee-driven writing networks. The study closely explores the implementation and impact of supportive measures in academia for novice researchers in the form of writing events. This paper draws on two case studies of doctoral students reflecting on the impact of their participation in social, academic literacy networks. The project also explores how these individuals were able to think about and mediate their own identities as they developed their reputations as experts in their field. Background Completing a doctoral degree is a rich, rewarding endeavour; however, it is also a challenging process. Novice academics are vulnerable to psychosocial and emotional stresses associated with being an academic within the highly competitive environment, such as isolation and burnout. More recently, scholarly interest has emerged regarding the academy’s pressures upon novice researchers, such as those entering full-time academic roles after completing their doctoral studies. Methodology A qualitative research design was implemented where data collection for this project involved in-depth semi-structured interviewing. The nature of the semistructured interviews enabled professional dialogue with each participant. The semi-structured nature of the interviews enabled flexibility where follow-up questions and probes allowed for richer data gathering. Data analysis occurred within a sociocultural framework. Contribution Explicitly focusing on doctoral students, we build upon existing knowledge and understanding of how novice academic writers negotiate, interpret, and understand the impact of their research dissemination and roles. While exploring how The Value of Collegiate, Attendee-Driven Writing Networks 150 these individuals think about and mediate their identities during the initial period of asserting their reputations as experts in the field, this study looks at how collegiate, attendee-driven writing networks can support novice academics to meet the demands for quality research dissemination and strive to meet the metrics expected of them. Findings This research has found that novice researchers who thrive on social interaction may often find collegiality lacking in their professional lives. Furthermore, those who can find a support network that fosters positive self-belief and provides a means for sharing successes benefit from countless opportunities for empowerment as novice researchers work through their doctorates. Recommendations for Practitioners This research confirms and provides details around how a collegiate atmosphere for novice academics helps mitigate feelings of isolation, vulnerability, and a lack of self-confidence in their scholastic ability. Overcoming such feelings occurs through learning from peers, overcoming isolation and learning self-managing techniques. Therefore, establishing spaces for collegiate, attendee-driven writing events within doctoral settings is encouraged. Recommendations for Researchers Further research into the benefits of collegiate, attendee-driven writing events and supporting the process of academic writing and dissemination can focus on transdisciplinary writing groups, as this particular study was centred within a specific faculty. Impact on Society Within the neoliberal context of higher education, novice academics can benefit from attendee-driven writing events intended to empower them and provide growth opportunities. Through participation in collegiate, attendee driven writing networks, which are social and peer-based, we show that novice academics can learn how to combat unsettling feelings of perfectionism, isolation, fear of inadequacy, and failure. The social element is central to understanding how writers can increase their productivity and dissemination by writing alongside peers. Future Research Novice researchers also represent early career researchers; thus, exploring collegiate, attendee-driven writing events for practicing academics is also encouraged. As noted above, exploring the potential of transdisciplinary writing networks would also be of value.","PeriodicalId":53524,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"149-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Doctoral Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28945/4700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aim/Purpose This particular study aims to contribute to the recent scholarly inquiry of doctoral student identity work within collegiate, attendee-driven writing networks. The study closely explores the implementation and impact of supportive measures in academia for novice researchers in the form of writing events. This paper draws on two case studies of doctoral students reflecting on the impact of their participation in social, academic literacy networks. The project also explores how these individuals were able to think about and mediate their own identities as they developed their reputations as experts in their field. Background Completing a doctoral degree is a rich, rewarding endeavour; however, it is also a challenging process. Novice academics are vulnerable to psychosocial and emotional stresses associated with being an academic within the highly competitive environment, such as isolation and burnout. More recently, scholarly interest has emerged regarding the academy’s pressures upon novice researchers, such as those entering full-time academic roles after completing their doctoral studies. Methodology A qualitative research design was implemented where data collection for this project involved in-depth semi-structured interviewing. The nature of the semistructured interviews enabled professional dialogue with each participant. The semi-structured nature of the interviews enabled flexibility where follow-up questions and probes allowed for richer data gathering. Data analysis occurred within a sociocultural framework. Contribution Explicitly focusing on doctoral students, we build upon existing knowledge and understanding of how novice academic writers negotiate, interpret, and understand the impact of their research dissemination and roles. While exploring how The Value of Collegiate, Attendee-Driven Writing Networks 150 these individuals think about and mediate their identities during the initial period of asserting their reputations as experts in the field, this study looks at how collegiate, attendee-driven writing networks can support novice academics to meet the demands for quality research dissemination and strive to meet the metrics expected of them. Findings This research has found that novice researchers who thrive on social interaction may often find collegiality lacking in their professional lives. Furthermore, those who can find a support network that fosters positive self-belief and provides a means for sharing successes benefit from countless opportunities for empowerment as novice researchers work through their doctorates. Recommendations for Practitioners This research confirms and provides details around how a collegiate atmosphere for novice academics helps mitigate feelings of isolation, vulnerability, and a lack of self-confidence in their scholastic ability. Overcoming such feelings occurs through learning from peers, overcoming isolation and learning self-managing techniques. Therefore, establishing spaces for collegiate, attendee-driven writing events within doctoral settings is encouraged. Recommendations for Researchers Further research into the benefits of collegiate, attendee-driven writing events and supporting the process of academic writing and dissemination can focus on transdisciplinary writing groups, as this particular study was centred within a specific faculty. Impact on Society Within the neoliberal context of higher education, novice academics can benefit from attendee-driven writing events intended to empower them and provide growth opportunities. Through participation in collegiate, attendee driven writing networks, which are social and peer-based, we show that novice academics can learn how to combat unsettling feelings of perfectionism, isolation, fear of inadequacy, and failure. The social element is central to understanding how writers can increase their productivity and dissemination by writing alongside peers. Future Research Novice researchers also represent early career researchers; thus, exploring collegiate, attendee-driven writing events for practicing academics is also encouraged. As noted above, exploring the potential of transdisciplinary writing networks would also be of value.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新手学术角色:大学生、参与者驱动的写作网络的价值
目的/目的本研究旨在促进最近在大学、参与者驱动的写作网络中对博士生身份工作的学术研究。本研究以写作事件的形式,密切探讨学术界对新研究者的支持措施的实施及其影响。本文借鉴了博士生的两个案例研究,反映了他们参与社会学术素养网络的影响。该项目还探讨了这些人如何能够思考和调解自己的身份,因为他们在各自的领域发展了专家的声誉。完成博士学位是一项丰富而有益的努力;然而,这也是一个具有挑战性的过程。作为一名学者,在竞争激烈的环境中,新手很容易受到心理和情感压力的影响,比如孤立和倦怠。最近,学术界开始关注该学院对新研究人员的压力,比如那些在完成博士学业后进入全职学术职位的人。本研究采用定性研究设计,数据收集采用深度半结构化访谈。半结构化访谈的性质使得与每个参与者进行专业对话成为可能。访谈的半结构化性质使后续问题和调查能够灵活地收集更丰富的数据。数据分析是在社会文化框架内进行的。明确地专注于博士生,我们建立在现有的知识和理解新手学术作家如何谈判,解释和理解他们的研究传播和角色的影响。在探索这些人在维护其作为该领域专家的声誉的初始阶段如何思考和调解他们的身份的同时,本研究还探讨了大学,参与者驱动的写作网络如何支持新手学者满足高质量研究传播的需求,并努力满足他们期望的指标。这项研究发现,擅长社交互动的研究新手往往会发现,他们的职业生涯中缺乏团队合作。此外,那些能够找到一个支持网络,培养积极的自信,并提供分享成功的手段的人,在研究新手完成博士学位的过程中,会从无数的授权机会中受益。这项研究证实并提供了关于大学氛围如何帮助新学者减轻孤立感、脆弱性和对其学术能力缺乏自信的细节。克服这种感觉可以通过向同伴学习、克服孤立和学习自我管理技巧来实现。因此,鼓励在博士设置中为学院、参与者驱动的写作活动建立空间。对研究人员的建议进一步研究大学,参与者驱动的写作活动和支持学术写作和传播过程的好处可以集中在跨学科写作小组,因为这个特殊的研究集中在一个特定的教师。在高等教育的新自由主义背景下,新学者可以从旨在赋予他们权力并提供成长机会的参与者驱动的写作活动中受益。通过参与以社交和同伴为基础的大学、参与者驱动的写作网络,我们展示了新学者可以学习如何对抗完美主义、孤立、对不足和失败的恐惧等令人不安的感觉。社会因素是理解作家如何通过与同行一起写作来提高生产力和传播的核心。未来研究新手研究人员也代表早期职业研究人员;因此,也鼓励为实践学者探索大学、参与者驱动的写作活动。如上所述,探索跨学科写作网络的潜力也很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Doctoral Studies
International Journal of Doctoral Studies Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
A Framework of Rhetorical Moves Designed to Scaffold the Research Proposal Development Process What Does It Mean To Be a Resilient Student? An Explorative Study of Doctoral Students’ Resilience and Coping Strategies Using Grounded Theory as the Analytic Lens PhD by Prospective Publication in Australian Business Schools: Provocations from a Collaborative Autoethnography Mitigating Ceiling Effects in a Longitudinal Study of Doctoral Engineering Student Stress and Persistence Into the Challenges of Aligning Key Sections of Doctoral Dissertations: Cognitive Analysis, Pedagogical Tools, and Instrument Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1