CLINICAL MANIFESTATION AND INCIDENCE OF DENTAL ENAMEL EROSION IN PATIENTS UNDER ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY

N. Trtić, R. Arbutina, O. Janković, V. Mirjanić, V. Veselinović
{"title":"CLINICAL MANIFESTATION AND INCIDENCE OF DENTAL ENAMEL EROSION IN PATIENTS UNDER ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY","authors":"N. Trtić, R. Arbutina, O. Janković, V. Mirjanić, V. Veselinović","doi":"10.7251/comen1901093a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dental erosions are defined as an irreversible loss of hard dental tissue caused by long-lasting and repetitive acid action, which dissolves the surface layer of hydroxyapatite crystal structure and fluorapatite, and the aggressive noxis not being created by the bacteria. Dental erosions can also be classified as occupational diseases. People who taste wine or carbonated drinks on a daily basis, as well as the people who are professionally engaged in swimming can spot this type of defect on their own teeth. Evaporation of industrial acids in battery factories, sanitary materials, or crystalline glass can also lead to dental erosions. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of dental erosion in patients under antihypertensive therapy and compare them with the frequency of dental erosion in patients who did not take the same therapy. Material and method: This research involved 62 respondents, aged from 20 to 70. Patients were classified into two groups, the experimental group with 31 patients being on a therapy with antihypertensive medications for more than 5 years, and the other one, control group, with 31 patients not being on the mentioned therapy. The subjective dental anamnesis obtained from the patients was noted along with tooth status, soft tissue intraoral examination and the degree of erosive changes according to BEWE index (Basic Erosive Wear Examination). Results: Comparing the statistical significance in difference between erosive index value of all teeth, there is obvious statistical difference of the average value. In the experimental group (p0.05), higher values of tooth erosion index were noted in comparison with the control group. The average value in the experimental group is 2.25, while in the control group it is 1.37. Conclusion: Erosive lesions are present in both experimental and control group respondents, with dental erosion being more explicit with patients who use antihypertensive medications.","PeriodicalId":10617,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Materials","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7251/comen1901093a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dental erosions are defined as an irreversible loss of hard dental tissue caused by long-lasting and repetitive acid action, which dissolves the surface layer of hydroxyapatite crystal structure and fluorapatite, and the aggressive noxis not being created by the bacteria. Dental erosions can also be classified as occupational diseases. People who taste wine or carbonated drinks on a daily basis, as well as the people who are professionally engaged in swimming can spot this type of defect on their own teeth. Evaporation of industrial acids in battery factories, sanitary materials, or crystalline glass can also lead to dental erosions. Aim: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of dental erosion in patients under antihypertensive therapy and compare them with the frequency of dental erosion in patients who did not take the same therapy. Material and method: This research involved 62 respondents, aged from 20 to 70. Patients were classified into two groups, the experimental group with 31 patients being on a therapy with antihypertensive medications for more than 5 years, and the other one, control group, with 31 patients not being on the mentioned therapy. The subjective dental anamnesis obtained from the patients was noted along with tooth status, soft tissue intraoral examination and the degree of erosive changes according to BEWE index (Basic Erosive Wear Examination). Results: Comparing the statistical significance in difference between erosive index value of all teeth, there is obvious statistical difference of the average value. In the experimental group (p0.05), higher values of tooth erosion index were noted in comparison with the control group. The average value in the experimental group is 2.25, while in the control group it is 1.37. Conclusion: Erosive lesions are present in both experimental and control group respondents, with dental erosion being more explicit with patients who use antihypertensive medications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
降压治疗患者牙釉质侵蚀的临床表现及发生率
牙齿腐蚀被定义为由于长期和重复的酸作用而导致的坚硬牙齿组织的不可逆转的损失,酸溶解了羟基磷灰石晶体结构和氟磷灰石的表层,并且细菌不会产生侵略性的毒素。牙齿腐蚀也可归类为职业病。每天喝葡萄酒或碳酸饮料的人,以及专业从事游泳的人都可以在自己的牙齿上发现这种缺陷。电池工厂、卫生材料或结晶玻璃中工业酸的蒸发也会导致牙齿腐蚀。目的:本研究的目的是确定接受降压治疗的患者的牙侵蚀频率,并将其与未接受相同治疗的患者的牙侵蚀频率进行比较。材料与方法:调查对象62人,年龄20 ~ 70岁。将患者分为两组,实验组有31例患者使用降压药物治疗5年以上,对照组有31例患者未使用降压药物治疗。根据BEWE指数(Basic糜烂磨损检查)记录患者的主观牙齿记忆、牙齿状况、口腔内软组织检查和糜烂变化程度。结果:各牙间腐蚀指数值比较差异有统计学意义,平均值差异有统计学意义。实验组的牙蚀指数明显高于对照组(p0.05)。实验组平均值为2.25,对照组平均值为1.37。结论:实验组和对照组均存在牙蚀性病变,使用抗高血压药物的患者牙蚀更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LABORATORY TESTING OF UNSTIMULATED AND STIMULATED SALIVA BUFFERING CAPACITY IN PATIENT AND CONTROL GROUPS AFTER TITRATION WITH HCl AND NaOH NEURAL NETWORKS FOR SOLVING HUXLEY’S EQUATION USE OF 3D-BIOPRINTING IN TISSUE ENGINEERING SCAFFOLD PRODUCTION DETERMINATION OF IRON CONTENT IN NATURAL MINERAL WATER: COMPARISON OF ICP-OES AND SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD INFLUENCE OF GEOLOGICAL PARAMETERS ON THE INDOOR RADON CONCENTRATION IN THE CITY OF TREBINJE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1