The Critical Role of the Institution‐Led Market in the Technological Catch‐Up of Emerging Market Enterprises: Evidence from Chinese Enterprises

Jiang Wei, Cong Sun, Qing Wang, Qiuyue Pan
{"title":"The Critical Role of the Institution‐Led Market in the Technological Catch‐Up of Emerging Market Enterprises: Evidence from Chinese Enterprises","authors":"Jiang Wei, Cong Sun, Qing Wang, Qiuyue Pan","doi":"10.1111/radm.12399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation scholars have, in the past, applied the concept of ‘windows of opportunity’ to study latecomer firms’ catch‐up. Previous research treats this concept as three separate aspects, i.e., technological, institutional and market. The role of government was seen as being concerned only with institutional windows of opportunity. However, governments in emerging markets exert influence not only through traditional means of institutional support but, also, via market‐driven mechanisms. The former refers to state procurement, resource provision, legislation, and administrative control, whereas the latter is concerned with demand creation, resource allocation, and the regulation of market orders. This multifaceted nature of government in promoting economic growth, guiding technological development, and influencing enterprise behavior remains under‐researched. Yet, it plays a crucial role in the catch‐up of emerging market enterprises. Therefore, based on innovation studies literature and an institution‐based view of international business, the present research proposes a new construct, termed the institution‐led market, with the aim to encapsulate the complex role of government in the catch‐up of emerging market enterprises. The institution‐led market is defined as a unique type of market that is well‐timed and strategically created by the government and supported by institutional policies and resources. A large database of 259 Chinese firms in 37 industries was created and analyzed using a hierarchical logistic model to empirically test the relationship between the institution‐led market and technological catch‐up of emerging market enterprises. We demonstrate that the institution‐led market positively affects the catch‐up of emerging market enterprises; furthermore, it significantly moderates the effect of technological discontinuity on the catch‐up. Finally, the theoretical contributions and managerial implications of the present research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":13594,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems & Economics eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems & Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Innovation scholars have, in the past, applied the concept of ‘windows of opportunity’ to study latecomer firms’ catch‐up. Previous research treats this concept as three separate aspects, i.e., technological, institutional and market. The role of government was seen as being concerned only with institutional windows of opportunity. However, governments in emerging markets exert influence not only through traditional means of institutional support but, also, via market‐driven mechanisms. The former refers to state procurement, resource provision, legislation, and administrative control, whereas the latter is concerned with demand creation, resource allocation, and the regulation of market orders. This multifaceted nature of government in promoting economic growth, guiding technological development, and influencing enterprise behavior remains under‐researched. Yet, it plays a crucial role in the catch‐up of emerging market enterprises. Therefore, based on innovation studies literature and an institution‐based view of international business, the present research proposes a new construct, termed the institution‐led market, with the aim to encapsulate the complex role of government in the catch‐up of emerging market enterprises. The institution‐led market is defined as a unique type of market that is well‐timed and strategically created by the government and supported by institutional policies and resources. A large database of 259 Chinese firms in 37 industries was created and analyzed using a hierarchical logistic model to empirically test the relationship between the institution‐led market and technological catch‐up of emerging market enterprises. We demonstrate that the institution‐led market positively affects the catch‐up of emerging market enterprises; furthermore, it significantly moderates the effect of technological discontinuity on the catch‐up. Finally, the theoretical contributions and managerial implications of the present research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制度主导型市场在新兴市场企业技术追赶中的关键作用:来自中国企业的证据
过去,创新学者们运用“机会之窗”的概念来研究后发企业的赶超。以往的研究将这一概念分为三个独立的方面,即技术、制度和市场。人们认为政府的作用只与制度上的机会窗口有关。然而,新兴市场的政府不仅通过传统的制度支持手段施加影响,而且还通过市场驱动机制施加影响。前者涉及国家采购、资源提供、立法和行政控制,后者涉及需求创造、资源配置和市场秩序调节。政府在促进经济增长、引导技术发展和影响企业行为方面的多面性仍有待研究。然而,它在新兴市场企业的追赶中起着至关重要的作用。因此,基于创新研究文献和基于制度的国际商业观点,本研究提出了一种新的结构,称为制度主导的市场,旨在概括政府在新兴市场企业追赶过程中的复杂作用。制度主导型市场被定义为一种独特的市场类型,它是由政府适时地、战略性地创造出来的,并得到制度政策和资源的支持。本文建立了一个包含中国37个行业259家企业的大型数据库,并运用层次逻辑模型对制度主导型市场与新兴市场企业技术追赶之间的关系进行了实证检验。研究表明,制度主导的市场对新兴市场企业的赶超具有正向影响;此外,它显著地调节了技术不连续性对赶超的影响。最后,讨论了本研究的理论贡献和管理意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investing in Lending Technology: IT Spending in Banking Governing 'European values' Inside Data Flows: Interdisciplinary Perspectives More Competitive Search Through Regulation Business News and Business Cycles Efecto de la banda ancha sobre el valor agregado en los municipios de Colombia (Effect of Broadband on Added Value in Colombia Municipalities)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1