Survival study on teeth after successful endodontic surgical retreatment: influence of crown height, root length, crown-to-root ratio and tooth type

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gien.2018.09.002
Daniele Angerame , Matteo De Biasi , Massimiliano Lenhardt , Lorenzo Bevilacqua , Vittorio Franco
{"title":"Survival study on teeth after successful endodontic surgical retreatment: influence of crown height, root length, crown-to-root ratio and tooth type","authors":"Daniele Angerame ,&nbsp;Matteo De Biasi ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Lenhardt ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Bevilacqua ,&nbsp;Vittorio Franco","doi":"10.1016/j.gien.2018.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To assess the influence of the crown height, root length, crown-to-root ratio, and tooth type on the survival of teeth subjected to surgical endodontic retreatment and classified as periapically healed.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>A single operator performed endodontic microsurgery interventions between 2008 and 2018 on teeth with refractory apical periodontitis. The present analysis selected the teeth classified as “complete periapical healing” according to the scale suggested by Molven. The postoperative periapical radiographs and those taken at the last recall visit were analysed by two independent calibrated examiners, who measured crown height and root length in a blind manner. The crown-to-root ratio was calculated as the ratio of the two variables. The level of inter- and intra-operator agreement was tested with Bland–Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement. An independent statistician conducted a survival analysis using Kaplan–Meier plots and a log-rank test (<em>α</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05) to assess the significance of the differences among the subgroups defined by the following criteria: (a) crown height &lt;median vs. &gt;median; (b) root length &lt;median vs. &gt;median; (c) crown-to-root ratio &lt;1 vs. &gt;1; (d) crown-to-root ratio &lt;median vs. &gt;median; (e) single-rooted teeth vs. multi-rooted teeth.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>At the end of the analysis, 42 patients were evaluated, each one contributing to the study with a single tooth. The mean follow-up period was 4.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.4 years. Survival estimates were significantly improved for the teeth with roots longer than 8<!--> <!-->mm, in comparison with that with shorter roots (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05). There were no statistically significant differences among the remaining considered subgroups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Under the conditions of this retrospective study, teeth with longer residual roots after apical surgery exhibited better chances of survival when compared to teeth with roots shorter than 8<!--> <!-->mm. The other considered variables did not seem to affect the survival of apically resected teeth.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":42221,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gien.2018.09.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1121417118300475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To assess the influence of the crown height, root length, crown-to-root ratio, and tooth type on the survival of teeth subjected to surgical endodontic retreatment and classified as periapically healed.

Methodology

A single operator performed endodontic microsurgery interventions between 2008 and 2018 on teeth with refractory apical periodontitis. The present analysis selected the teeth classified as “complete periapical healing” according to the scale suggested by Molven. The postoperative periapical radiographs and those taken at the last recall visit were analysed by two independent calibrated examiners, who measured crown height and root length in a blind manner. The crown-to-root ratio was calculated as the ratio of the two variables. The level of inter- and intra-operator agreement was tested with Bland–Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement. An independent statistician conducted a survival analysis using Kaplan–Meier plots and a log-rank test (α = 0.05) to assess the significance of the differences among the subgroups defined by the following criteria: (a) crown height <median vs. >median; (b) root length <median vs. >median; (c) crown-to-root ratio <1 vs. >1; (d) crown-to-root ratio <median vs. >median; (e) single-rooted teeth vs. multi-rooted teeth.

Results

At the end of the analysis, 42 patients were evaluated, each one contributing to the study with a single tooth. The mean follow-up period was 4.2 ± 2.4 years. Survival estimates were significantly improved for the teeth with roots longer than 8 mm, in comparison with that with shorter roots (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences among the remaining considered subgroups.

Conclusions

Under the conditions of this retrospective study, teeth with longer residual roots after apical surgery exhibited better chances of survival when compared to teeth with roots shorter than 8 mm. The other considered variables did not seem to affect the survival of apically resected teeth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牙髓再治疗成功后的存活研究:冠高、根长、冠根比和牙型的影响
目的探讨牙冠高度、根长、冠根比、牙型对根尖周愈合后手术再治疗的牙存活的影响。方法2008 ~ 2018年,由一名操作人员对难治性根尖牙炎患者进行根管显微手术干预。根据Molven提出的标准,本分析选择了“根尖周完全愈合”的牙齿。术后根尖周x线片和最后一次召回就诊时的x线片由两名独立校准的检查人员进行分析,他们以盲法测量冠高和根长。冠根比计算为两个变量的比值。使用Bland-Altman图检验经营者之间和经营者内部的一致性水平,一致性限为95%。独立统计学家使用Kaplan-Meier图和log-rank检验(α = 0.05)进行生存分析,以评估按以下标准定义的亚组间差异的显著性:(a)冠高<中位数vs >中位数;(b)根长度<median vs. >median;(c)冠根比<1 vs >1;(d)冠根比<median vs >median;(e)单根牙与多根牙。结果在分析结束时,对42例患者进行了评估,每个患者都以一颗牙齿为研究做出了贡献。平均随访时间4.2±2.4年。与根较短的牙相比,根长于8毫米的牙的存活率有显著提高(p <0.05)。其余考虑的亚组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论在本回顾性研究的条件下,根尖术后残根较长的牙比残根短于8mm的牙有更好的生存机会。其他考虑的变量似乎不影响根尖切除牙齿的存活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia was founded in 1987 and is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endodontics (SIE). It is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on clinical research and/or clinical methodology, case reports related to Endodontics. The Journal evaluates also contributes in restorative dentistry, dental traumatology, experimental pathophysiology, pharmacology and microbiology dealing with Endodontics.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy of Depotphoresis and diode laser for reduction of microbial load and postoperative pain, and healing of periapical lesions: a randomized clinical trial Endodontics: clinical protocols on scientific basis Anatomical proximity of upper teeth and local factors associated with the thickness of the maxillary sinus membrane: a retrospective study A contemporary approach to treat necrotic immature teeth using different bioceramic materials Endodontic guides and ultrasonic tips for management of calcifications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1