Significant learning experiences and implied students

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH On the Horizon Pub Date : 2020-01-24 DOI:10.1108/oth-09-2019-0067
D. Starr-Glass
{"title":"Significant learning experiences and implied students","authors":"D. Starr-Glass","doi":"10.1108/oth-09-2019-0067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reflects on and seeks to reconcile and to consolidate two bodies of literature. The first deals with course design in higher education, particularly with efforts to create significant learning experiences. The second body of literature, which is considerably less well-known, considers the implied student – the intended or preconceived student for whom these learning experiences are created. Significant learning experiences are created by instructors for students, not for themselves. Thus, a critical condition for success in course design is to examine and interrogate the implied student that instructors had in mind and to reconcile those preconceived notions with the actual students who populate the learning space.,The paper is a critical reflection on the literature and the author’s experience in designing college level business and economics courses and in attempting to create significant learning experiences in those courses. The study reflects on practice, reviews the relevant literature, and is speculative in nature. It is not empirically based and may well have limited generalizability. However, it is hoped that this paper will promote further exploration of the implied student construct and will lead to further research into the misalignment of expectations and outcomes between implied students and actual students.,The paper contends that there is inevitably a gap – for both the instructor and the learner – between the expectations and outcomes that are anticipated for implied students and realized by actual students. It suggests that recognition of this gap is a critical element in designing significant learning experiences for actual learners. The paper further suggests that success in creating these experiences is improved through reconsidering the implied student stereotype, engaging with actual students and instructor-led communication of the implicit goals and outcomes of the course.,Students are best served if they engage in learning spaces thoughtfully centered on significant learning experiences. However, learning environments are often constructed around envisaged students who are defined by the learning expectations, pedagogic philosophies and ideological biases of the instructor. This paper provides value by encouraging instructors to explore their preconceptions of the implied student and creating and facilitating learning environments that recognize, appreciate and respond to the actual students who will populate them. Further, the paper highlights “the implied student,” which has gained considerable traction in Nordic countries but only limited attention in the USA and UK.","PeriodicalId":47013,"journal":{"name":"On the Horizon","volume":"9 1","pages":"55-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"On the Horizon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/oth-09-2019-0067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper reflects on and seeks to reconcile and to consolidate two bodies of literature. The first deals with course design in higher education, particularly with efforts to create significant learning experiences. The second body of literature, which is considerably less well-known, considers the implied student – the intended or preconceived student for whom these learning experiences are created. Significant learning experiences are created by instructors for students, not for themselves. Thus, a critical condition for success in course design is to examine and interrogate the implied student that instructors had in mind and to reconcile those preconceived notions with the actual students who populate the learning space.,The paper is a critical reflection on the literature and the author’s experience in designing college level business and economics courses and in attempting to create significant learning experiences in those courses. The study reflects on practice, reviews the relevant literature, and is speculative in nature. It is not empirically based and may well have limited generalizability. However, it is hoped that this paper will promote further exploration of the implied student construct and will lead to further research into the misalignment of expectations and outcomes between implied students and actual students.,The paper contends that there is inevitably a gap – for both the instructor and the learner – between the expectations and outcomes that are anticipated for implied students and realized by actual students. It suggests that recognition of this gap is a critical element in designing significant learning experiences for actual learners. The paper further suggests that success in creating these experiences is improved through reconsidering the implied student stereotype, engaging with actual students and instructor-led communication of the implicit goals and outcomes of the course.,Students are best served if they engage in learning spaces thoughtfully centered on significant learning experiences. However, learning environments are often constructed around envisaged students who are defined by the learning expectations, pedagogic philosophies and ideological biases of the instructor. This paper provides value by encouraging instructors to explore their preconceptions of the implied student and creating and facilitating learning environments that recognize, appreciate and respond to the actual students who will populate them. Further, the paper highlights “the implied student,” which has gained considerable traction in Nordic countries but only limited attention in the USA and UK.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重要的学习经验和隐含的学生
本文对两种文学体进行了反思,并试图调和和巩固这两种文学体。第一部分涉及高等教育的课程设计,特别是如何创造有意义的学习体验。第二种不太为人所知的文学作品,考虑的是隐含的学生——这些学习经历是为他们创造的。重要的学习经验是由教师为学生创造的,而不是为他们自己创造的。因此,课程设计成功的一个关键条件是检查和询问教师心目中的隐含学生,并将这些先入为主的观念与占据学习空间的实际学生相协调。这篇论文是对文献和作者设计大学水平的商业和经济学课程的经验的批判性反思,并试图在这些课程中创造重要的学习体验。本研究反思实践,回顾相关文献,具有思辨性。它不是基于经验的,很可能具有有限的普遍性。然而,希望本文能促进对隐含学生结构的进一步探索,并对隐含学生与实际学生之间的期望和结果偏差进行进一步的研究。本文认为,对于教师和学习者来说,隐含学生所期望的结果与实际学生所实现的结果之间不可避免地存在着差距。这表明,在为实际学习者设计有意义的学习体验时,认识到这一差距是一个关键因素。本文进一步提出,通过重新考虑隐含的学生刻板印象,与实际学生接触,以及教师主导的课程隐含目标和结果的沟通,可以提高创造这些体验的成功率。如果学生参与到以重要学习经验为中心的学习空间中,他们会得到最好的服务。然而,学习环境往往是围绕着预期的学生构建的,这些学生是由教师的学习期望、教学哲学和意识形态偏见所定义的。本文通过鼓励教师探索他们对隐含学生的先入为主的观念,创造和促进学习环境,以识别、欣赏和回应将构成这些环境的实际学生,提供了价值。此外,本文还强调了“隐含学生”,这一概念在北欧国家获得了相当大的关注,但在美国和英国却受到了有限的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
On the Horizon
On the Horizon EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: On the Horizon provides an insight into how the changing face of technology is making it possible for educational institutions to form new relationships across geographic and cultural boundaries.
期刊最新文献
Our mission is uplift: Afrofuturism and collective work for liberation in Black homeschooling organizations High school teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in instruction Developing individual capability in organizations through the promotion of heutagogy Psychometric properties of a scale to measure social entrepreneurship competency in Mexican university students Student accommodation characteristics, perceived overall satisfaction and academic performance: evidence from six Scottish universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1