Risk factors for conversion of forefoot or midfoot amputations to below knee amputation

Ryan S. Constantine , Elliot LH. Le , Michael B. Gehring , Rene Kafka , Garrett Moore , Matthew L. Iorio
{"title":"Risk factors for conversion of forefoot or midfoot amputations to below knee amputation","authors":"Ryan S. Constantine ,&nbsp;Elliot LH. Le ,&nbsp;Michael B. Gehring ,&nbsp;Rene Kafka ,&nbsp;Garrett Moore ,&nbsp;Matthew L. Iorio","doi":"10.1016/j.orthop.2022.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aims to identify risk factors as well as proper indications for forefoot or midfoot amputations at the transmetatarsal, Lisfranc or Chopart level as a potential avenue for distal limb salvage and avoid below knee amputation (BKA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study utilized the PearlDiver national database encompassing 91 million unique patients from 2010 to 3/31/2020 to identify patients who underwent foot amputation (CPT-28800, CPT-28805). The primary endpoint is conversion to BKA within 6 months. Propensity matched cohorts were created using age, gender and common comorbidities. Logistic regression utilizing the matched cohorts determined odds ratios for conversion to BKA based on indication. Indications included abscess, gangrene, osteomyelitis, and diabetic wounds. Analysis was repeated at 1, 2 and five years. Chi-square analysis was used to assess the impact of comorbid peripheral vascular disease (PVD) in a subgroup of patients with osteomyelitis. Time to conversion to BKA was tabulated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The database identified 17,875 patients who underwent forefoot or midfoot amputation . Conversion to BKA occurred in 2400 patients with median time of 71 days. Logistic regression of the matched cohorts revealed that gangrene was a significant risk factor for conversion to BKA, while osteomyelitis was protective. Subgroup analysis of the osteomyelitis cohort revealed a higher rate of conversion to BKA for patients with concomitant PVD (OR 1.44; P = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Based on our data, forefoot or midfoot amputation should be cautiously considered in patients with gangrene or osteomyelitis with concomitant PVD because of a significantly higher rate of conversion to BKA.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100994,"journal":{"name":"Orthoplastic Surgery","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 61-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X22000215/pdfft?md5=b5203fb72aee5f490d66233f97c87ff0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666769X22000215-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthoplastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666769X22000215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aims to identify risk factors as well as proper indications for forefoot or midfoot amputations at the transmetatarsal, Lisfranc or Chopart level as a potential avenue for distal limb salvage and avoid below knee amputation (BKA).

Methods

This study utilized the PearlDiver national database encompassing 91 million unique patients from 2010 to 3/31/2020 to identify patients who underwent foot amputation (CPT-28800, CPT-28805). The primary endpoint is conversion to BKA within 6 months. Propensity matched cohorts were created using age, gender and common comorbidities. Logistic regression utilizing the matched cohorts determined odds ratios for conversion to BKA based on indication. Indications included abscess, gangrene, osteomyelitis, and diabetic wounds. Analysis was repeated at 1, 2 and five years. Chi-square analysis was used to assess the impact of comorbid peripheral vascular disease (PVD) in a subgroup of patients with osteomyelitis. Time to conversion to BKA was tabulated.

Results

The database identified 17,875 patients who underwent forefoot or midfoot amputation . Conversion to BKA occurred in 2400 patients with median time of 71 days. Logistic regression of the matched cohorts revealed that gangrene was a significant risk factor for conversion to BKA, while osteomyelitis was protective. Subgroup analysis of the osteomyelitis cohort revealed a higher rate of conversion to BKA for patients with concomitant PVD (OR 1.44; P = 0.01).

Conclusion

Based on our data, forefoot or midfoot amputation should be cautiously considered in patients with gangrene or osteomyelitis with concomitant PVD because of a significantly higher rate of conversion to BKA.

Level of evidence

IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前足或中足截肢转为膝下截肢的危险因素
本研究旨在确定前足或中足经跖骨、Lisfranc或Chopart水平截肢的危险因素和适当适应症,作为远端肢体保留和避免膝下截肢(BKA)的潜在途径。方法本研究利用PearlDiver国家数据库,该数据库包含2010年至2020年3月31日期间9100万独特患者,以确定接受足部截肢(CPT-28800, CPT-28805)的患者。主要终点是在6个月内转化为BKA。使用年龄、性别和常见合并症创建倾向匹配队列。利用匹配的队列进行逻辑回归,根据适应症确定转成BKA的优势比。适应症包括脓肿、坏疽、骨髓炎和糖尿病性伤口。在1岁、2岁和5岁时重复分析。采用卡方分析来评估骨髓炎亚组患者合并症周围血管疾病(PVD)的影响。将转换为BKA所需的时间制成表格。结果该数据库确定了17,875例接受前足或中足截肢的患者。2400例患者转化为BKA,中位时间为71天。匹配队列的Logistic回归显示坏疽是转化为BKA的重要危险因素,而骨髓炎具有保护作用。骨髓炎队列的亚组分析显示,合并PVD的患者转化为BKA的比率更高(OR 1.44;p = 0.01)。根据我们的数据,坏疽或骨髓炎合并PVD的患者应谨慎考虑前足或中足截肢,因为它们转化为BKA的几率要高得多。证据水平:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spino-plastic surgery Erratum regarding previously published articles Editorial Board Composite osteo-tendino-cutaneous reverse radial forearm flap for complex thumb reconstruction: A case report The keystone island perforator flap: An “ideal” local soft tissue flap for the lower extremity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1