2021 Miles Conrad Award Lecture: Heather Joseph

Q3 Social Sciences Information Services and Use Pub Date : 2021-09-22 DOI:10.3233/isu-210116
H. Joseph
{"title":"2021 Miles Conrad Award Lecture: Heather Joseph","authors":"H. Joseph","doi":"10.3233/isu-210116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is based upon the 2021 Miles Conrad Award Lecture that was given by Heather Joseph at the second annual NISO Plus conference held virtually from February 22–25, 2021. The lecture provided a brief look back at the emergence of the Open Access (OA) movement in scholarly communication beginning with the E-biomed proposal in 1999 that was shortly followed by the Budapest Declaration released on February 14, 2002, through how far it has come in almost two decades. The author notes that the initial reaction to OA was often just a quick dismissal of it as an idealistic pipe dream and as the idea began to grow in popularity, skepticism changed into hostility. OA was criticized as being too disruptive to the then-existent publishing paradigm. Yet, far from disappearing, the movement towards the open sharing of knowledge steadily advanced. Today conversations about “why” or “whether” to open up the scholarly communication system have evolved into conversations about how best to do it. The author notes that the Budapest Declaration underscored that the end goal of OA is to empower individuals and communities around the world with the ability to share their knowledge as well as to share in accessing the knowledge of others. She warns that members of the global scholarly communication community must look critically at who currently can participate in the production of knowledge, and whose voices are represented in the “global intellectual conversation” that need to be facilitated. Whose voices are still are left out because structural barriers – be they technical, financial, legal, cultural, or linguistic – prevent them from joining?","PeriodicalId":39698,"journal":{"name":"Information Services and Use","volume":"35 1","pages":"81-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Services and Use","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-210116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is based upon the 2021 Miles Conrad Award Lecture that was given by Heather Joseph at the second annual NISO Plus conference held virtually from February 22–25, 2021. The lecture provided a brief look back at the emergence of the Open Access (OA) movement in scholarly communication beginning with the E-biomed proposal in 1999 that was shortly followed by the Budapest Declaration released on February 14, 2002, through how far it has come in almost two decades. The author notes that the initial reaction to OA was often just a quick dismissal of it as an idealistic pipe dream and as the idea began to grow in popularity, skepticism changed into hostility. OA was criticized as being too disruptive to the then-existent publishing paradigm. Yet, far from disappearing, the movement towards the open sharing of knowledge steadily advanced. Today conversations about “why” or “whether” to open up the scholarly communication system have evolved into conversations about how best to do it. The author notes that the Budapest Declaration underscored that the end goal of OA is to empower individuals and communities around the world with the ability to share their knowledge as well as to share in accessing the knowledge of others. She warns that members of the global scholarly communication community must look critically at who currently can participate in the production of knowledge, and whose voices are represented in the “global intellectual conversation” that need to be facilitated. Whose voices are still are left out because structural barriers – be they technical, financial, legal, cultural, or linguistic – prevent them from joining?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2021年迈尔斯康拉德奖讲座:希瑟约瑟夫
本文基于Heather Joseph在2021年2月22日至25日举行的第二届NISO Plus年度会议上发表的2021年Miles Conrad奖演讲。讲座简要回顾了开放获取(OA)运动在学术交流中的兴起,从1999年的电子生物医学提案开始,紧接着是2002年2月14日发布的布达佩斯宣言,以及近20年来的发展历程。作者指出,对开放获取的最初反应通常只是将其视为理想主义的白日梦,随着这个想法开始流行,怀疑转变为敌意。OA被批评为对当时存在的出版范式具有太大的破坏性。然而,开放共享知识的运动非但没有消失,反而稳步推进。今天,关于“为什么”或“是否”开放学术交流系统的讨论已经演变成关于如何最好地开放学术交流系统的讨论。作者指出,布达佩斯宣言强调开放获取的最终目标是使世界各地的个人和社区能够分享他们的知识,以及分享获取他人知识的能力。她警告说,全球学术传播界的成员必须批判性地看待目前谁可以参与知识的生产,以及谁的声音在需要促进的“全球知识对话”中得到了代表。谁的声音仍然被排除在外,因为结构性障碍——无论是技术、金融、法律、文化还是语言——阻止他们加入?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Services and Use
Information Services and Use Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Information Services & Use is an information and information technology oriented publication with a wide scope of subject matters. International in terms of both audience and authorship, the journal aims at leaders in information management and applications in an attempt to keep them fully informed of fast-moving developments in fields such as: online systems, offline systems, electronic publishing, library automation, education and training, word processing and telecommunications. These areas are treated not only in general, but also in specific contexts; applications to business and scientific fields are sought so that a balanced view is offered to the reader.
期刊最新文献
Unlocking potential: Harnessing the power of metadata for discoverability and accessibility Implementing and assessing Seamlessaccess: A publisher’s experience NISO’s content profile/linked document standard: A research communication format for today’s scholarly ecosystem Unanticipating metadata: Metadata in the ages of the internet and AI (Re?)Building trust in research integrity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1