Assessing Learning Outcomes for Undergraduate Teaching Assistants and Peer Mentors

Jeffrey W. Murray, Bonnie Boaz, Leslie Cohen-Gee, J. Galligan, Christian Horlick
{"title":"Assessing Learning Outcomes for Undergraduate Teaching Assistants and Peer Mentors","authors":"Jeffrey W. Murray, Bonnie Boaz, Leslie Cohen-Gee, J. Galligan, Christian Horlick","doi":"10.14434/josotl.v22i2.31276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay offers assessment rubrics for three of the most common modalities of engagement of undergraduate teaching assistants and peer mentors serving in the undergraduate classroom: leading/facilitating a whole-class activity or discussion, facilitating a small-group activity or discussion, and working with students one-on-one.  In developing these assessment tools, we began with a sketch of our program’s learning objectives, and conducted an analysis of former UTAs’ start-of-semester “work plans” and end-of-semester “final reflections,” which allowed us to better match the rubrics with students’ own goals / motivations for serving as UTAs and perceptions of their own experiences as UTAs.  We hope that these three assessment rubrics can be productively adopted or adapted by other faculty mentors working with undergraduate teaching assistants or peer mentors in similar programs, as well as stimulate further discussion about appropriate learning objectives and assessment resources for such programs.","PeriodicalId":93822,"journal":{"name":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","volume":"6 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of scholarship of teaching and learning : JoSoTL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v22i2.31276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay offers assessment rubrics for three of the most common modalities of engagement of undergraduate teaching assistants and peer mentors serving in the undergraduate classroom: leading/facilitating a whole-class activity or discussion, facilitating a small-group activity or discussion, and working with students one-on-one.  In developing these assessment tools, we began with a sketch of our program’s learning objectives, and conducted an analysis of former UTAs’ start-of-semester “work plans” and end-of-semester “final reflections,” which allowed us to better match the rubrics with students’ own goals / motivations for serving as UTAs and perceptions of their own experiences as UTAs.  We hope that these three assessment rubrics can be productively adopted or adapted by other faculty mentors working with undergraduate teaching assistants or peer mentors in similar programs, as well as stimulate further discussion about appropriate learning objectives and assessment resources for such programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估本科助教和同伴导师的学习成果
本文提供了本科助教和同伴导师在本科课堂中最常见的三种参与方式的评估准则:领导/促进全班活动或讨论,促进小组活动或讨论,以及与学生一对一的合作。在开发这些评估工具时,我们首先概述了我们项目的学习目标,并对前犹他大学校长学期初的“工作计划”和学期末的“最终反思”进行了分析,这使我们能够更好地将这些规则与学生自己作为犹他大学校长的目标/动机以及他们自己作为犹他大学校长的经历的看法相匹配。我们希望这三个评估标准能够被其他与本科助教或类似项目的同行导师一起工作的教师导师有效地采用或调整,并促进对此类项目适当的学习目标和评估资源的进一步讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊最新文献
Inclusive Access Course Materials: An Analysis of a Technical College’s Inclusive Access Program Re-Envisioning Learning through a Trauma-Informed Lens: Empowering Students in their Personal and Academic Growth Exploring Achievement Behaviors in Non-Major Statistics Course: An Expectancy-Value Perspective and Thoughts for Practice Curating, Community, Collaboration Pausing for More
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1