Single-sex versus coeducational schooling in 19th-century Victorian public schools

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES History of Education Review Pub Date : 2020-12-16 DOI:10.1108/her-04-2020-0023
H. Carole
{"title":"Single-sex versus coeducational schooling in 19th-century Victorian public schools","authors":"H. Carole","doi":"10.1108/her-04-2020-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSoon after its establishment in 1863, the Board of Education – “the body responsible for administering public education in Victoria – determined that a system of universal mixed (coeducational) schooling would be adopted in the colony. Existing single-sex departments were “encouraged”, or compelled, to amalgamate, and no new separate schools were established. Although administrators and officials endorsed coeducation, primarily on the grounds of efficiency and economy, opposition from some teachers and parents persisted for many decades. Those opposed to the mixing of children within the schools expressed particular concern about the moral well-being of female pupils, and wished to protect them from what they perceived as corrupting influences. Nevertheless, once decided upon, the policy of universal coeducation prevailed, and when Victoria's first state secondary schools were established in the early 20th century, they too were coeducational.Design/methodology/approachDocumentary evidence, primarily the records of the various boards responsible for the administration of the public schools, evidence provided to several royal commissions, and various contemporary sources, have been examined to discover how the policy of universal coeducation was developed and implemented, and to examine what arguments were offered in favour of and against such a system.FindingsThe colony of Victoria implemented a system of universal coeducation within the public education sector well in advance of its adoption by other Australian colonies, and before it was generally accepted by similar societies elsewhere. The purpose of this paper is to examine why, how and by whom the policy of coeducation was formulated and implemented, and what opposition it faced.Originality/valueAlthough reference is often made to coeducational schooling in histories of education in the 19th century, the information provided is usually of a general nature, without providing specific information about the process by which separate schooling was superseded by coeducation – how and when one type of educational provision came to be replaced by another.","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/her-04-2020-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeSoon after its establishment in 1863, the Board of Education – “the body responsible for administering public education in Victoria – determined that a system of universal mixed (coeducational) schooling would be adopted in the colony. Existing single-sex departments were “encouraged”, or compelled, to amalgamate, and no new separate schools were established. Although administrators and officials endorsed coeducation, primarily on the grounds of efficiency and economy, opposition from some teachers and parents persisted for many decades. Those opposed to the mixing of children within the schools expressed particular concern about the moral well-being of female pupils, and wished to protect them from what they perceived as corrupting influences. Nevertheless, once decided upon, the policy of universal coeducation prevailed, and when Victoria's first state secondary schools were established in the early 20th century, they too were coeducational.Design/methodology/approachDocumentary evidence, primarily the records of the various boards responsible for the administration of the public schools, evidence provided to several royal commissions, and various contemporary sources, have been examined to discover how the policy of universal coeducation was developed and implemented, and to examine what arguments were offered in favour of and against such a system.FindingsThe colony of Victoria implemented a system of universal coeducation within the public education sector well in advance of its adoption by other Australian colonies, and before it was generally accepted by similar societies elsewhere. The purpose of this paper is to examine why, how and by whom the policy of coeducation was formulated and implemented, and what opposition it faced.Originality/valueAlthough reference is often made to coeducational schooling in histories of education in the 19th century, the information provided is usually of a general nature, without providing specific information about the process by which separate schooling was superseded by coeducation – how and when one type of educational provision came to be replaced by another.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
19世纪维多利亚公立学校的单性别与男女同校教育
在1863年成立后不久,教育委员会——负责管理维多利亚公共教育的机构——决定在殖民地采用一种普遍的男女混合学校制度。现有的单一性别的院系被“鼓励”或强制合并,并且没有建立新的单独的学校。虽然行政人员和官员主要基于效率和经济的理由支持男女同校,但一些教师和家长的反对持续了几十年。那些反对学生混校的人对女学生的道德福祉表示特别关切,并希望保护她们不受他们所认为的腐败影响。然而,一旦决定,普遍的男女同校政策就占了上风,当维多利亚州的第一所州立中学在20世纪初建立时,它们也是男女同校的。设计/方法/方法文献证据,主要是负责管理公立学校的各个委员会的记录,提供给几个皇家委员会的证据,以及各种当代来源,已经被检查,以发现普遍的男女同校教育政策是如何发展和实施的,并检查支持和反对这种制度的论点。维多利亚殖民地在公共教育部门实施了一种普遍的男女同校教育制度,这比其他澳大利亚殖民地采用这种制度要早得多,也比其他类似社会普遍接受这种制度要早得多。本文的目的是研究男女同校政策是由谁制定和实施的,以及它面临的反对意见。独创性/价值虽然在19世纪的教育史中经常提到男女同校的教育,但所提供的信息通常是一般性的,而没有提供关于男女同校取代分开的学校的过程的具体信息——一种教育是如何以及何时被另一种教育所取代的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The demise of school-developed elective courses in NSW: a case study in centralisation “A pleasant walk on the Pakihi”: ecological orientations in mid-century nature study Enchanting things: the scientific communication of Julius Sumner Miller The Endeavour scholarships program in the era of the Asian century: promise unfulfilled Changing policy, changing plans: responses to the end of fee-free education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1