Evaluation of six screening items for the vibration syndrome.

S. Iwasaki, Hideyoshi Suzuki
{"title":"Evaluation of six screening items for the vibration syndrome.","authors":"S. Iwasaki, Hideyoshi Suzuki","doi":"10.1539/JOH1959.26.477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Six primary screening test items (grip strength, skin temperature, Nail-Press test, pain sense, and vibration sense at 125Hz and at 250Hz) for the vibration syndrome were assessed for validity and reliability using four measures: correlation with working time in years with vibrating tools; degree of relationship with four major complaints (Reynaud's phenomenon, numbness, coldness, and pain); correlation between two repeated examinations; values of t-test calculated on two groups of workers of comparable age, one having all of the four major complaints and the other having no complaint at all. Both left and right hand scores were used in the analysis with a total of 12 items. As these scores were too heterogeneous to make direct comparison, the screening items were ranked according to the values of the four measures and then the obtained ranks were totalled for each item to establish a further ranking. In this way, the ranks of each screening item were determined. The results indicated that: 1) For validity, pain sense and 250Hz vibration sense were found to have relatively high validity, followed by 125Hz vibration sense and grip force. Skin temperature and the Nail-Press test occupied the lowest ranks. 2) For reliability, grip force and 250Hz vibra tion sense were highest followed by pain sense. In this case again, skin temperature and the Nail Press test turned out to belong to the lowest group, which included the 125 Hz vibration sense. 3) The right and left hand scores were separately analyzed and the right hand scores tended to surpass the left hand ones, although these comparison were not statistically significant (in 8 out of 12 comparisons, right hand scores were superior to left hand ones for validity, and for reliability it was the case for 9 out of 12 cases). These results suggest that the two measures of the peripheral blood flow (i.e., skin temperature and the Nail-Press test) should be replaced by more reliable measures.","PeriodicalId":21333,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo Igaku","volume":"265 1","pages":"477-482"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo Igaku","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/JOH1959.26.477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Six primary screening test items (grip strength, skin temperature, Nail-Press test, pain sense, and vibration sense at 125Hz and at 250Hz) for the vibration syndrome were assessed for validity and reliability using four measures: correlation with working time in years with vibrating tools; degree of relationship with four major complaints (Reynaud's phenomenon, numbness, coldness, and pain); correlation between two repeated examinations; values of t-test calculated on two groups of workers of comparable age, one having all of the four major complaints and the other having no complaint at all. Both left and right hand scores were used in the analysis with a total of 12 items. As these scores were too heterogeneous to make direct comparison, the screening items were ranked according to the values of the four measures and then the obtained ranks were totalled for each item to establish a further ranking. In this way, the ranks of each screening item were determined. The results indicated that: 1) For validity, pain sense and 250Hz vibration sense were found to have relatively high validity, followed by 125Hz vibration sense and grip force. Skin temperature and the Nail-Press test occupied the lowest ranks. 2) For reliability, grip force and 250Hz vibra tion sense were highest followed by pain sense. In this case again, skin temperature and the Nail Press test turned out to belong to the lowest group, which included the 125 Hz vibration sense. 3) The right and left hand scores were separately analyzed and the right hand scores tended to surpass the left hand ones, although these comparison were not statistically significant (in 8 out of 12 comparisons, right hand scores were superior to left hand ones for validity, and for reliability it was the case for 9 out of 12 cases). These results suggest that the two measures of the peripheral blood flow (i.e., skin temperature and the Nail-Press test) should be replaced by more reliable measures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
振动综合征的六个筛选项目的评价。
采用四项指标评估振动综合征的六个主要筛选测试项目(握力、皮肤温度、指甲按压测试、疼痛感、125Hz和250Hz振动感)的效度和信度:与使用振动工具工作年数的相关性;与四种主诉(雷诺现象、麻木、冰冷和疼痛)的关系程度;两次重复检查的相关性;对两组年龄相当的工人计算t检验值,一组有所有四种主要抱怨,另一组根本没有抱怨。左手和右手得分均用于分析,共12个项目。由于这些分数的异质性太大,无法进行直接比较,因此根据四项措施的值对筛选项目进行排名,然后将获得的排名累加到每个项目中,以建立进一步的排名。这样就确定了每个筛选项目的等级。结果表明:1)效度方面,疼痛感和250Hz振动感效度较高,其次是125Hz振动感和握力。皮肤温度和指甲按压测试排名最低。2)可靠性方面,握力和250Hz振动感最高,痛感次之。在这种情况下,皮肤温度和指甲按压测试结果属于最低组,其中包括125赫兹的振动感。3)右手得分和左手得分分别进行分析,右手得分有超过左手得分的趋势,但这些比较没有统计学意义(12个比较中有8个在效度上优于左手得分,12个比较中有9个在信度上优于左手得分)。这些结果表明,外周血流量的两种测量方法(即皮肤温度和指甲按压试验)应该被更可靠的测量方法所取代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sangyouigaku-Suishin-Kenkyuukai (Association of Occupational Physicians and Nurses of U.O.E.H. Graduates Occupational Mental Health in the Future From the Field of Audiometory Internationalization and Creativity in Occupational Health On Basic Research in Study of Industrial Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1