A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation in the treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis

Christopher Sutton, Andrew S. Pooley, Kevin D. Jones, Richard W. Dover, Patricia Haines
{"title":"A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation in the treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis","authors":"Christopher Sutton,&nbsp;Andrew S. Pooley,&nbsp;Kevin D. Jones,&nbsp;Richard W. Dover,&nbsp;Patricia Haines","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00451.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To determine the value of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) as part of the laparoscopic laser treatment of painful endometriosis.</p><p>A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial.</p><p>A referral centre for the treatment of endometriosis.</p><p>51 women with pelvic pain and pelvic endometriosis.</p><p>All patients underwent laparoscopic laser ablation of their endometriosis and were then randomly allocated to receive LUNA or no further treatment.</p><p>Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and chronic non-menstrual pelvic pain were assessed using visual analogue scales and structured questionnaires, preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.</p><p>24 patients were randomly allocated to receive laser vaporization alone, and 27 to receive a LUNA procedure in addition. The mean age of the patients involved was 28 years (range 20–41), with no differences between the groups for stage of endometriosis. Comparisons were made between the two treatment groups at 3 and 6 months. Significant differences in favour of the non-LUNA group were found at 3 months (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and at 6 months (<i>P</i> = 0.022) for dysmenorrhoea. A significant difference in favour of the non-LUNA group also occurred at 6 months for chronic non-menstrual pain (<i>P</i> = 0.323). There were no significant differences recorded for dyspareunia. Bonferroni's adjustment was applied, and the only difference which remained significant was for dysmenorrhoea at 3 months (<i>P</i> = 0.033) in favour of the non-LUNA group. The preoperative and 6-month pain scores for all the patients were combined. There was a significant improvement in the pain scores recorded at 6 months (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001).</p><p>Laparoscopic laser ablation of endometriosis is confirmed as an effective treatment, to which uterine nerve ablation adds no benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 4","pages":"217-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00451.x","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00451.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

To determine the value of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) as part of the laparoscopic laser treatment of painful endometriosis.

A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial.

A referral centre for the treatment of endometriosis.

51 women with pelvic pain and pelvic endometriosis.

All patients underwent laparoscopic laser ablation of their endometriosis and were then randomly allocated to receive LUNA or no further treatment.

Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and chronic non-menstrual pelvic pain were assessed using visual analogue scales and structured questionnaires, preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

24 patients were randomly allocated to receive laser vaporization alone, and 27 to receive a LUNA procedure in addition. The mean age of the patients involved was 28 years (range 20–41), with no differences between the groups for stage of endometriosis. Comparisons were made between the two treatment groups at 3 and 6 months. Significant differences in favour of the non-LUNA group were found at 3 months (P = 0.003), and at 6 months (P = 0.022) for dysmenorrhoea. A significant difference in favour of the non-LUNA group also occurred at 6 months for chronic non-menstrual pain (P = 0.323). There were no significant differences recorded for dyspareunia. Bonferroni's adjustment was applied, and the only difference which remained significant was for dysmenorrhoea at 3 months (P = 0.033) in favour of the non-LUNA group. The preoperative and 6-month pain scores for all the patients were combined. There was a significant improvement in the pain scores recorded at 6 months (P < 0.0001).

Laparoscopic laser ablation of endometriosis is confirmed as an effective treatment, to which uterine nerve ablation adds no benefit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项前瞻性,随机,双盲对照试验腹腔镜子宫神经消融术治疗盆腔疼痛与子宫内膜异位症
目的探讨腹腔镜子宫神经消融术作为腹腔镜激光治疗疼痛性子宫内膜异位症的价值。一项前瞻性随机双盲对照试验。治疗子宫内膜异位症的转诊中心。51名患有盆腔疼痛和盆腔子宫内膜异位症的妇女。所有患者均接受腹腔镜激光消融子宫内膜异位症,然后随机分配接受LUNA或不接受进一步治疗。在术前、术后3个月和6个月,采用视觉模拟量表和结构化问卷评估痛经、性交困难和慢性非经期盆腔疼痛。随机分配24例患者单独接受激光汽化,27例患者另外接受LUNA手术。患者的平均年龄为28岁(范围20-41岁),各组之间子宫内膜异位症的分期没有差异。在3个月和6个月时对两组患者进行比较。非luna组在痛经3个月时(P = 0.003)和6个月时(P = 0.022)有显著差异。6个月时,非luna组在慢性非经期疼痛方面也有显著差异(P = 0.323)。在性交困难方面无显著差异。应用Bonferroni调整,唯一的显著差异是3个月时的痛经(P = 0.033)优于非luna组。所有患者的术前和6个月疼痛评分合并。6个月时疼痛评分有显著改善(P < 0.0001)。腹腔镜激光消融术治疗子宫内膜异位症是一种有效的治疗方法,而子宫神经消融术没有任何益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Microendoscopy in the operating room†: author's reply Broken needle tip in Cooper's ligament: high occurrence rate with the EndostitchTM suturing device† Ray Garry's reply to Prof. Dr Rudnicki's letter Reply to Jones Images of endometriosis: an interactive CD-ROM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1