Responsible innovation in molecular robotics in Japan

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Chem-Bio Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1273/CBIJ.18.164
G. Yoshizawa, R. Est, Daisuke Yoshinaga, Mikihito Tanaka, Ryuma Shineha, A. Konagaya
{"title":"Responsible innovation in molecular robotics in Japan","authors":"G. Yoshizawa, R. Est, Daisuke Yoshinaga, Mikihito Tanaka, Ryuma Shineha, A. Konagaya","doi":"10.1273/CBIJ.18.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade Japanese researchers have taken the lead in the emerging discipline of molecular robotics. This new technology aims to produce artificial molecular systems that can adapt to changes in the environment, self-organize and evolve. This paper explores the question of how to stimulate responsible research and innovation in the field of molecular robotics technologies. For this, we first draw lessons from earlier societal responses in Japan to emerging technologies, such as genetic engineering, nanotechnology, synthetic biology and genomic research. Next we describe various real-time technology assessment (TA) activities on molecular robotics in Japan to depict the state-of-the-art of the academic and public debate on the social aspects of molecular robotics. Lessons from earlier societal responses to emerging technologies demonstrated three potential challenges: finding and involving the ‘right’ experts and stakeholders, keeping regulations up to date, and getting scientists and citizens involved in science communication. A literature review, ‘future workshop’ and scenario workshop raised a number of ethical, social, political and cultural issues, and addressed desirable and undesirable scenarios for the next few decades. Twitter text mining analysis indicates that the level of attention, knowledge and awareness about molecular robots among a broader audience is still very limited. In conclusion, we identify four activities crucial to enable responsible innovation in molecular robotics—getting to grips with the speed of the development of molecular robotics, monitoring related technical trends, the establishment of a more stable TA knowledge base, and a sustained interaction between molecular roboticists and social scientists.","PeriodicalId":40659,"journal":{"name":"Chem-Bio Informatics Journal","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chem-Bio Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1273/CBIJ.18.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Over the last decade Japanese researchers have taken the lead in the emerging discipline of molecular robotics. This new technology aims to produce artificial molecular systems that can adapt to changes in the environment, self-organize and evolve. This paper explores the question of how to stimulate responsible research and innovation in the field of molecular robotics technologies. For this, we first draw lessons from earlier societal responses in Japan to emerging technologies, such as genetic engineering, nanotechnology, synthetic biology and genomic research. Next we describe various real-time technology assessment (TA) activities on molecular robotics in Japan to depict the state-of-the-art of the academic and public debate on the social aspects of molecular robotics. Lessons from earlier societal responses to emerging technologies demonstrated three potential challenges: finding and involving the ‘right’ experts and stakeholders, keeping regulations up to date, and getting scientists and citizens involved in science communication. A literature review, ‘future workshop’ and scenario workshop raised a number of ethical, social, political and cultural issues, and addressed desirable and undesirable scenarios for the next few decades. Twitter text mining analysis indicates that the level of attention, knowledge and awareness about molecular robots among a broader audience is still very limited. In conclusion, we identify four activities crucial to enable responsible innovation in molecular robotics—getting to grips with the speed of the development of molecular robotics, monitoring related technical trends, the establishment of a more stable TA knowledge base, and a sustained interaction between molecular roboticists and social scientists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本分子机器人的负责任创新
在过去的十年中,日本研究人员在分子机器人这一新兴学科中处于领先地位。这项新技术旨在制造能够适应环境变化、自我组织和进化的人工分子系统。本文探讨了如何在分子机器人技术领域激发负责任的研究和创新。为此,我们首先从日本早期对新兴技术的社会反应中吸取教训,这些技术包括基因工程、纳米技术、合成生物学和基因组研究。接下来,我们将描述日本分子机器人的各种实时技术评估(TA)活动,以描述分子机器人在社会方面的学术和公众辩论的最新进展。从早期社会对新兴技术的反应中吸取的教训表明了三个潜在的挑战:找到“合适的”专家和利益相关者并让他们参与进来,保持法规的更新,以及让科学家和公民参与科学传播。文献综述、“未来研讨会”和情景研讨会提出了一系列伦理、社会、政治和文化问题,并讨论了未来几十年的理想和不理想情景。Twitter文本挖掘分析表明,在更广泛的受众中,对分子机器人的关注、知识和意识水平仍然非常有限。总之,我们确定了四项至关重要的活动,以实现分子机器人技术的负责任的创新——掌握分子机器人技术的发展速度,监测相关的技术趋势,建立一个更稳定的人工智能知识库,以及分子机器人专家和社会科学家之间的持续互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chem-Bio Informatics Journal
Chem-Bio Informatics Journal BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Application of Model Core Potentials to Zn- and Mg-containing Metalloproteins in the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method How Beneficial or Threatening is Artificial Intelligence? Difficulties and prospects of data curation for ADME in silico modeling Multiple Logistic Regression Modeling of Compound Class as Active or Inactive Against COX-2 and Prediction on Designed Coxib Derivatives and Similar Compounds Fragment molecular orbital calculations containing Mg2+ ions: PPlase domain of Cyclophilin G
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1