In vitro digestibility of native grass hay.

J. Karn, D. Clanton, L. Rittenhouse
{"title":"In vitro digestibility of native grass hay.","authors":"J. Karn, D. Clanton, L. Rittenhouse","doi":"10.2307/3896522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Method of storage had a greater effect on the in vitro dry matter digestibility (DMD) of native grass hay than either storage time or date of cutting. The nutritive value of native hay was maintained better by storing it in round bales than by storing it in windrows, bunches or letting it remain standing. The first 60 days in storage was the period when native hay had the greatest loss of nutritive value regardless of storage method. There was an interaction of cutting date and year on DMD. The early cut hay in 1962 had a higher DMD (42.7%) than the late cut hay (40.3%). There was no difference in 1963 (40.6 vs. 40.1%).","PeriodicalId":16918,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Range Management","volume":"20 1","pages":"134-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1971-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Range Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3896522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Method of storage had a greater effect on the in vitro dry matter digestibility (DMD) of native grass hay than either storage time or date of cutting. The nutritive value of native hay was maintained better by storing it in round bales than by storing it in windrows, bunches or letting it remain standing. The first 60 days in storage was the period when native hay had the greatest loss of nutritive value regardless of storage method. There was an interaction of cutting date and year on DMD. The early cut hay in 1962 had a higher DMD (42.7%) than the late cut hay (40.3%). There was no difference in 1963 (40.6 vs. 40.1%).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
天然牧草的体外消化率。
贮藏方式对天然干草体外干物质消化率的影响大于贮藏时间和刈割日期。将天然干草储存在圆捆中比储存在窗台、捆束中或让其保持原状更能保持其营养价值。无论采用何种储存方式,贮藏前60 d是天然干草营养价值损失最大的时期。在DMD上存在刈割日期和刈割年份的交互作用。1962年早割干草的DMD(42.7%)高于晚割干草(40.3%)。1963年无差异(40.6% vs 40.1%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Grasses and Grassland Farming The Study of Plant Communities: An Introduction to Plant Ecology Research observation: Daily movement patterns of hill climbing and bottom dwelling cowsfull access The rangelands of the Sahel. Estimating Cattle Gains from Consumption of Digestible Forage on Ponderosa Pine Range (La Estimacion de Ganancias del Ganado Bovino por el Consumo de Forraje Digestible)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1