Temporal Changes of Stable High‐Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Levels and Prognosis

A. Roos, G. Edgren, M. Holzmann
{"title":"Temporal Changes of Stable High‐Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Levels and Prognosis","authors":"A. Roos, G. Edgren, M. Holzmann","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.025082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The prognostic implications of temporal change of previously stable high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations are unknown. We investigated the prognosis associated with temporal changes of stable high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs‐cTnT) concentrations. Methods and Results All patients presenting with cardiac symptoms and ≥2 hs‐cTnT measurements at the time of their first visit to 7 different emergency departments in Sweden between December 9, 2009, and December 31, 2016, were identified (n=66 159). We included all patients with stable hs‐cTnT but no acute coronary syndrome diagnosis who had ≥1 hs‐cTnT measured also at a second visit >30 days from the first visit. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for all‐cause mortality and cardiovascular events according to temporal change of hs‐cTnT between the visits, using patients without myocardial injury (<15 ng/L) at the first visit and persistently stable hs‐cTnT at the second visit as the reference. Altogether, 12 869 patients were included, of whom 5191 (40%) had myocardial injury (hs‐cTnT ≥15 ng/L). During a median follow‐up of 2.3 (interquartile range, 1.4–3.7) years, 3271 (25%) patients died. In patients with myocardial injury and a temporal increase in hs‐cTnT, the adjusted all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality was 4‐ and 5‐fold elevated (HR, 4.21; 95% CI, 3.55–5.00; and HR, 5.08; 95% CI, 3.73–6.92), and the adjusted risk of heart failure hospitalization almost 3‐fold (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 2.26–3.39). Conclusions Temporal change of previously stable hs‐cTnT is associated with the risk of death and cardiovascular outcomes, with highest risks observed in patients with myocardial injury and increasing hs‐cTnT.","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.025082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background The prognostic implications of temporal change of previously stable high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin concentrations are unknown. We investigated the prognosis associated with temporal changes of stable high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs‐cTnT) concentrations. Methods and Results All patients presenting with cardiac symptoms and ≥2 hs‐cTnT measurements at the time of their first visit to 7 different emergency departments in Sweden between December 9, 2009, and December 31, 2016, were identified (n=66 159). We included all patients with stable hs‐cTnT but no acute coronary syndrome diagnosis who had ≥1 hs‐cTnT measured also at a second visit >30 days from the first visit. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for all‐cause mortality and cardiovascular events according to temporal change of hs‐cTnT between the visits, using patients without myocardial injury (<15 ng/L) at the first visit and persistently stable hs‐cTnT at the second visit as the reference. Altogether, 12 869 patients were included, of whom 5191 (40%) had myocardial injury (hs‐cTnT ≥15 ng/L). During a median follow‐up of 2.3 (interquartile range, 1.4–3.7) years, 3271 (25%) patients died. In patients with myocardial injury and a temporal increase in hs‐cTnT, the adjusted all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality was 4‐ and 5‐fold elevated (HR, 4.21; 95% CI, 3.55–5.00; and HR, 5.08; 95% CI, 3.73–6.92), and the adjusted risk of heart failure hospitalization almost 3‐fold (HR, 2.77; 95% CI, 2.26–3.39). Conclusions Temporal change of previously stable hs‐cTnT is associated with the risk of death and cardiovascular outcomes, with highest risks observed in patients with myocardial injury and increasing hs‐cTnT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
稳定高敏感心肌肌钙蛋白T水平的时间变化与预后
背景:先前稳定的高敏感性心肌肌钙蛋白浓度的时间变化对预后的影响尚不清楚。我们研究了稳定的高敏感性心肌肌钙蛋白T (hs - cTnT)浓度的时间变化与预后的关系。方法和结果:2009年12月9日至2016年12月31日期间,所有在瑞典7个不同急诊科首次就诊时出现心脏症状且hs - cTnT≥2的患者(n=66 159)被确定。我们纳入了所有hs - cTnT稳定但没有急性冠状动脉综合征诊断的患者,这些患者在第一次就诊后>30天的第二次就诊时也测量了≥1 hs - cTnT。以第一次访视时无心肌损伤(<15 ng/L)和第二次访视时hs - cTnT持续稳定的患者为参考,根据访视期间hs - cTnT的时间变化,计算全因死亡率和心血管事件的95% ci风险比(hr)。共纳入12869例患者,其中5191例(40%)有心肌损伤(hs‐cTnT≥15 ng/L)。在中位随访时间为2.3年(四分位数间距为1.4-3.7年)期间,3271例(25%)患者死亡。在心肌损伤和hs - cTnT时间升高的患者中,调整后的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率分别升高了4 -和5 -倍(HR, 4.21;95% ci, 3.55-5.00;HR为5.08;95% CI, 3.73-6.92),心力衰竭住院的调整风险几乎是3倍(HR, 2.77;95% ci, 2.26-3.39)。结论:先前稳定的hs - cTnT的时间变化与死亡和心血管结局的风险相关,心肌损伤和hs - cTnT升高的患者风险最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Survival in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Active Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study Treatment of Slow‐Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow‐Mediated Hyperemia: The Randomized RAIN‐FLOW Study Predicting Arterial Thrombotic Events Following Peripheral Revascularization Using Objective Viscoelastic Data Safety of Catheter Ablation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Amyloidosis Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With and Without Resheathing and Repositioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1