A system for proactive risk assessment of application changes in cloud operations

Q1 Computer Science IEEE Cloud Computing Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1109/CLOUD53861.2021.00025
Raghav Batta, L. Shwartz, M. Nidd, A. Azad, H. Kumar
{"title":"A system for proactive risk assessment of application changes in cloud operations","authors":"Raghav Batta, L. Shwartz, M. Nidd, A. Azad, H. Kumar","doi":"10.1109/CLOUD53861.2021.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Change is one of the biggest contributors to service outages. With more enterprises migrating their applications to cloud and using automated build and deployment the volume and rate of changes has significantly increased. Furthermore, microservice-based architectures have reduced the turnaround time for changes and increased the dependency between services. All of the above make it impossible for the Site Reliability Engineers (SREs) to use the traditional methods of manual risk assessment for changes. In order to mitigate change-induced service failures and ensure continuous improvement for cloud native services, it is critical to have an automated system for assessing the risk of change deployments. In this paper, we present an AI-based system for proactively assessing the risk associated with deployment of application changes in cloud operations. The risk assessment is accompanied with actionable risk explainability. We discuss the usage of this system in two primary scenarios of automated and manual deployment. In automated deployment scenario, our approach is able to alert SREs on 70 % of problematic changes by blocking only 1.5 % of total changes and recommending human intervention. In manual deployment scenario, our approach recommends the SREs to perform extra due diligence for 2.8 % of total changes to capture 84 % of problematic changes.","PeriodicalId":54281,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Cloud Computing","volume":"16 1","pages":"112-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Cloud Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD53861.2021.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Change is one of the biggest contributors to service outages. With more enterprises migrating their applications to cloud and using automated build and deployment the volume and rate of changes has significantly increased. Furthermore, microservice-based architectures have reduced the turnaround time for changes and increased the dependency between services. All of the above make it impossible for the Site Reliability Engineers (SREs) to use the traditional methods of manual risk assessment for changes. In order to mitigate change-induced service failures and ensure continuous improvement for cloud native services, it is critical to have an automated system for assessing the risk of change deployments. In this paper, we present an AI-based system for proactively assessing the risk associated with deployment of application changes in cloud operations. The risk assessment is accompanied with actionable risk explainability. We discuss the usage of this system in two primary scenarios of automated and manual deployment. In automated deployment scenario, our approach is able to alert SREs on 70 % of problematic changes by blocking only 1.5 % of total changes and recommending human intervention. In manual deployment scenario, our approach recommends the SREs to perform extra due diligence for 2.8 % of total changes to capture 84 % of problematic changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对云操作中的应用程序变更进行前瞻性风险评估的系统
变更是造成服务中断的最大原因之一。随着越来越多的企业将其应用程序迁移到云,并使用自动化构建和部署,更改的数量和速度显著增加。此外,基于微服务的体系结构减少了更改的周转时间,并增加了服务之间的依赖性。所有这些都使得站点可靠性工程师(SREs)无法使用传统的人工风险评估方法进行更改。为了减轻变更引起的服务故障,并确保云原生服务的持续改进,有一个用于评估变更部署风险的自动化系统是至关重要的。在本文中,我们提出了一个基于人工智能的系统,用于主动评估与云操作中应用程序更改部署相关的风险。风险评估伴随着可操作的风险解释。我们将讨论该系统在自动部署和手动部署两种主要场景中的使用情况。在自动化部署场景中,我们的方法能够通过仅阻止1.5%的总更改并建议人工干预来提醒SREs 70%的有问题的更改。在手动部署场景中,我们的方法建议SREs对总更改的2.8%执行额外的尽职调查,以捕获84%的有问题的更改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Cloud Computing
IEEE Cloud Computing Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cessation. IEEE Cloud Computing is committed to the timely publication of peer-reviewed articles that provide innovative research ideas, applications results, and case studies in all areas of cloud computing. Topics relating to novel theory, algorithms, performance analyses and applications of techniques are covered. More specifically: Cloud software, Cloud security, Trade-offs between privacy and utility of cloud, Cloud in the business environment, Cloud economics, Cloud governance, Migrating to the cloud, Cloud standards, Development tools, Backup and recovery, Interoperability, Applications management, Data analytics, Communications protocols, Mobile cloud, Private clouds, Liability issues for data loss on clouds, Data integration, Big data, Cloud education, Cloud skill sets, Cloud energy consumption, The architecture of cloud computing, Applications in commerce, education, and industry, Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), Software as a Service (SaaS), Business Process as a Service (BPaaS)
期刊最新文献
Different in different ways: A network-analysis approach to voice and prosody in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Layered Contention Mitigation for Cloud Storage Towards More Effective and Explainable Fault Management Using Cross-Layer Service Topology Bypass Container Overlay Networks with Transparent BPF-driven Socket Replacement Event-Driven Approach for Monitoring and Orchestration of Cloud and Edge-Enabled IoT Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1