Enabling and Empowering Lens-based Workers: An Analysis of the Photo Bill of Rights

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of Media Ethics Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/23736992.2022.2107525
Keith Greenwood, Ryan J. Thomas, Cory W. MacNeil
{"title":"Enabling and Empowering Lens-based Workers: An Analysis of the Photo Bill of Rights","authors":"Keith Greenwood, Ryan J. Thomas, Cory W. MacNeil","doi":"10.1080/23736992.2022.2107525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In June 2020, representatives of eight photography organizations addressed ongoing challenges to the industry by introducing the “Photo Bill of Rights,” asserting “the rights of all lens-based workers and defining actions that build a safer, healthier, more inclusive, and transparent industry.” The bill centers what “lens-based workers” are owed by the media organizations that employ them. This study analyzes the bill’s contents and the explicit and implicit values within it, finding that the bill presents a normative view of the work environment lens-based workers should expect as a baseline. In so doing, the bill connects what lens-based workers owe their respective publics to what their employers owe those same workers. The bill highlights the enabling environment that these workers need to satisfy their obligations to the public. The bill reminds employers of their duty to create an equitable environment that can enable the fulfillment of public responsibility.","PeriodicalId":45979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Ethics","volume":"1 1","pages":"194 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Media Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2022.2107525","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT In June 2020, representatives of eight photography organizations addressed ongoing challenges to the industry by introducing the “Photo Bill of Rights,” asserting “the rights of all lens-based workers and defining actions that build a safer, healthier, more inclusive, and transparent industry.” The bill centers what “lens-based workers” are owed by the media organizations that employ them. This study analyzes the bill’s contents and the explicit and implicit values within it, finding that the bill presents a normative view of the work environment lens-based workers should expect as a baseline. In so doing, the bill connects what lens-based workers owe their respective publics to what their employers owe those same workers. The bill highlights the enabling environment that these workers need to satisfy their obligations to the public. The bill reminds employers of their duty to create an equitable environment that can enable the fulfillment of public responsibility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
授权和授权基于镜头的工人:对照片权利法案的分析
2020年6月,8个摄影组织的代表通过引入“摄影权利法案”来解决行业面临的持续挑战,主张“所有镜头工人的权利,并确定建立一个更安全、更健康、更包容和更透明的行业的行动。”该法案的核心是雇佣“镜头工人”的媒体机构欠他们的钱。本研究分析了该法案的内容以及其中的显性和隐性价值,发现该法案提出了基于镜头的工人应该期望的工作环境作为基线的规范性观点。通过这样做,该法案将镜片工人对各自公众的亏欠与雇主对这些工人的亏欠联系起来。该法案强调了这些工人履行其对公众义务所需的有利环境。该条例草案提醒雇主,他们有责任创造一个公平的环境,使他们能够履行公共责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
In Defense of Journalism and Presidential Debates From Classroom to Global Discourse: New Resources for Media Ethics Character Skepticism and the Virtuous Journalist Inside the Ivory Tower: How Student Journalists Reason About Ethics The Influence of Crucibles of Experience in Moral Development & Psychology of Public Relations Exemplars
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1