The Accuracy of Combined Electrocardiogram Criteria to Diagnose Right Atrial Enlargement in Adults With Uncorrected Secundum Atrial Septal Defect

IF 2.3 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology Pub Date : 2019-08-01 DOI:10.1177/1179546819869948
Purwati Pole Rio, H. Hariawan, D. Anggrahini, A. B. Hartopo, L. K. Dinarti
{"title":"The Accuracy of Combined Electrocardiogram Criteria to Diagnose Right Atrial Enlargement in Adults With Uncorrected Secundum Atrial Septal Defect","authors":"Purwati Pole Rio, H. Hariawan, D. Anggrahini, A. B. Hartopo, L. K. Dinarti","doi":"10.1177/1179546819869948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Right atrium (RA) enlargement in uncorrected atrial septal defect (ASD) is due to chronic volume overload. Several electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria had been proposed for screening RA enlargement. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of ECG criteria in detecting RA enlargement in adults with uncorrected ASD. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving 120 adults with uncorrected secundum ASD. The subjects underwent ECG examination, transthoracic echocardiography, and right heart catheterization. An RA enlargement was determined with RA volume index by transthoracic echocardiography. Various ECG and combined ECG criteria were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: An RA enlargement was detected in 64.2% subjects. The P wave height > 2.5 mm in lead II criterion had the best specificity (100%) and PPV (100%), but low sensitivity (19%) and accuracy (48%). The combined 2 ECG criteria (QRS axis > 90°, R/S ratio > 1 in V1) had 82% sensitivity, 56% specificity, 73% accuracy, 77% PPV, and 63% NPV. The combined 3 ECG criteria (QRS axis > 90°, R/S ratio > 1 in V1, and P wave height > 1.5 mm in V2) had 35% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 53% accuracy, 82% PPV, and 43% NPV. Conclusions: The combined 2 ECG criteria (QRS axis > 90° and R/S ratio > 1 in V1) had increased sensitivity, better accuracy, and more balance of PPV and NPV as compared with P wave > 2.5 mm in II criterion and combined 3 ECG criteria to diagnose RA enlargement in adults with uncorrected ASD.","PeriodicalId":10419,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179546819869948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Right atrium (RA) enlargement in uncorrected atrial septal defect (ASD) is due to chronic volume overload. Several electrocardiogram (ECG) criteria had been proposed for screening RA enlargement. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of ECG criteria in detecting RA enlargement in adults with uncorrected ASD. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study involving 120 adults with uncorrected secundum ASD. The subjects underwent ECG examination, transthoracic echocardiography, and right heart catheterization. An RA enlargement was determined with RA volume index by transthoracic echocardiography. Various ECG and combined ECG criteria were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: An RA enlargement was detected in 64.2% subjects. The P wave height > 2.5 mm in lead II criterion had the best specificity (100%) and PPV (100%), but low sensitivity (19%) and accuracy (48%). The combined 2 ECG criteria (QRS axis > 90°, R/S ratio > 1 in V1) had 82% sensitivity, 56% specificity, 73% accuracy, 77% PPV, and 63% NPV. The combined 3 ECG criteria (QRS axis > 90°, R/S ratio > 1 in V1, and P wave height > 1.5 mm in V2) had 35% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 53% accuracy, 82% PPV, and 43% NPV. Conclusions: The combined 2 ECG criteria (QRS axis > 90° and R/S ratio > 1 in V1) had increased sensitivity, better accuracy, and more balance of PPV and NPV as compared with P wave > 2.5 mm in II criterion and combined 3 ECG criteria to diagnose RA enlargement in adults with uncorrected ASD.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
联合心电图标准诊断未矫正房间隔缺损成人右房扩大的准确性
背景:未经纠正的房间隔缺损(ASD)右心房(RA)扩大是由于慢性容量过载。一些心电图(ECG)标准已提出筛选RA扩大。本研究旨在比较ECG标准在检测未纠正ASD的成人RA扩大中的准确性。方法:这是一项横断面研究,涉及120名未矫正的成人继发性ASD。受试者接受心电图检查、经胸超声心动图检查和右心导管检查。经胸超声心动图以RA容积指数确定RA增大。评估各种心电图和综合心电图标准。对其敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)进行统计分析。结果:64.2%的受试者出现RA增大。ⅱ型铅标准中P波高度> 2.5 mm特异性最高(100%),PPV最高(100%),但敏感性较低(19%),准确性较低(48%)。合并2项心电图标准(QRS轴> 90°,V1 R/S比> 1)敏感性82%,特异性56%,准确性73%,PPV 77%, NPV 63%。3个心电图标准(QRS轴> 90°,V1 R/S比> 1,V2 P波高> 1.5 mm)的敏感性为35%,特异性为86%,准确性为53%,PPV为82%,NPV为43%。结论:联合2项心电图标准(QRS轴> 90°,V1中R/S比> 1)诊断未矫正ASD成人RA扩大的灵敏度、准确性和PPV与NPV的平衡程度均高于II标准P波> 2.5 mm和联合3项心电图标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology
Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Influence of Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of 250 684 Patients. Optimizing PCSK9 Inhibitor Integration for Cardiovascular Disease Management in Pakistan. A Leaky False Pouch: Left Ventricle Pseudoaneurysm with Active Hemopericardium Detected on Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography. Impact of Hyperuricemia and Urate-Lowering Agents on Cardiovascular Diseases. The Risk Factors of Mitral Regurgitation Deterioration After Secundum Atrial Septal Defect Closure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1