School Administrators and Physical Educators: A Scoping Review of Perceptions and Partnerships From 2000 to 2020

Scott W. T. McNamara, M. Townsley, Kelly Hangauer
{"title":"School Administrators and Physical Educators: A Scoping Review of Perceptions and Partnerships From 2000 to 2020","authors":"Scott W. T. McNamara, M. Townsley, Kelly Hangauer","doi":"10.1177/1052684621990618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical education (PE) is an academic subject that delivers students a standards-based program designed to foster the knowledge and skills needed to be physically active for a lifetime. Although there is a dearth of research that has examined school administrators’ perceptions and interactions with PE, it has been reported that school administrators often are a barrier that disrupts effective PE programming. This study aimed to conduct a scoping review of the literature to capture a comprehensive view of the peer-reviewed research that has focused on physical educators’ collaboration with and perceptions of school administrators, and literature related to school administrators’ collaboration and perceptions of physical educators. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist guided this investigation. Seven databases were searched, and 29 articles met the full inclusion criteria. This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the evidence and research trends; nonetheless, the heterogeneity of the studies and limited literature on this topic make it difficult to form any substantial conclusions. The need for additional research is especially true for research examining PE teachers’ perceptions and interactions with school administrators, as only three of the identified studies in this review focused on this topic. The recognition of these gaps in the literature may be important to the fields of educational leadership and PE, as it may lead to more concerted efforts to examine how these fields interact and how they can collaborate more effectively.","PeriodicalId":92928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of school leadership","volume":"6 23 1","pages":"186 - 217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of school leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1052684621990618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Physical education (PE) is an academic subject that delivers students a standards-based program designed to foster the knowledge and skills needed to be physically active for a lifetime. Although there is a dearth of research that has examined school administrators’ perceptions and interactions with PE, it has been reported that school administrators often are a barrier that disrupts effective PE programming. This study aimed to conduct a scoping review of the literature to capture a comprehensive view of the peer-reviewed research that has focused on physical educators’ collaboration with and perceptions of school administrators, and literature related to school administrators’ collaboration and perceptions of physical educators. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist guided this investigation. Seven databases were searched, and 29 articles met the full inclusion criteria. This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the evidence and research trends; nonetheless, the heterogeneity of the studies and limited literature on this topic make it difficult to form any substantial conclusions. The need for additional research is especially true for research examining PE teachers’ perceptions and interactions with school administrators, as only three of the identified studies in this review focused on this topic. The recognition of these gaps in the literature may be important to the fields of educational leadership and PE, as it may lead to more concerted efforts to examine how these fields interact and how they can collaborate more effectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学校管理者和体育教育者:从2000年到2020年对观念和伙伴关系的范围审查
体育教育(PE)是一门学术学科,它向学生提供基于标准的课程,旨在培养终身体育活动所需的知识和技能。虽然缺乏对学校管理人员对体育的看法和互动的研究,但据报道,学校管理人员往往是破坏有效体育规划的障碍。本研究旨在对文献进行范围审查,以全面了解关注体育教育者与学校管理者的合作和看法的同行评议研究,以及与学校管理者的合作和对体育教育者的看法相关的文献。系统审查的首选报告项目范围审查清单的扩展指导了这项调查。检索了7个数据库,有29篇文章完全符合纳入标准。这一范围审查提供了证据和研究趋势的全面概述;然而,研究的异质性和有限的文献使得很难形成任何实质性的结论。对于体育教师的认知和与学校管理者的互动的研究尤其需要额外的研究,因为在本综述中只有三个确定的研究关注这一主题。认识到文献中的这些差距可能对教育领导和体育领域很重要,因为它可能会导致更一致的努力来研究这些领域如何相互作用以及如何更有效地合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Instructional Program Coherence: A Structural Support for Teacher Psychological Needs Principals’ Discursive Framing and Communications and Educators’ Job Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic The Effect of Middle Leaders’ Cognitive Complexity on Team Performance and Conflict Management Through Middle Leaders’ Positive Perception of Diversity Academic Culture: Its Meaning, Measure and Contribution to Student Learning Navigating Emotional Discomfort in Developing Equity-Driven School Leaders: A Conceptual-Pedagogical Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1