Composition of Probabilistic Preferences in Multicriteria Problems with Variables Measured in Likert Scales and Fitted by Empirical Distributions

Standards Pub Date : 2023-07-17 DOI:10.3390/standards3030020
L. Gavião, A. P. Sant’Anna, G. B. A. Lima, P. Garcia
{"title":"Composition of Probabilistic Preferences in Multicriteria Problems with Variables Measured in Likert Scales and Fitted by Empirical Distributions","authors":"L. Gavião, A. P. Sant’Anna, G. B. A. Lima, P. Garcia","doi":"10.3390/standards3030020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to demonstrate the advantages of the Composition of Probabilistic Preferences method in multicriteria problems with data from Likert scales. Multicriteria decision aids require a database as a decision matrix, in which two or more alternatives are evaluated according to two or more variables selected as decision criteria. Several problems of this nature use measures by Likert scales. Depending on the method, parameters from these data (e.g., means, modes or medians) are required for calculations. This parameterization of data in ordinal scales has fueled controversy for decades between authors who favor mathematical/statistical rigor and argue against the procedure, stating that ordinal scales should not be parameterized, and scientists from other areas who have shown gains from the process that compensates for this relaxation. The Composition of Probabilistic Preferences can allay the protests raised and obtain more accurate results than descriptive statistics or parametric models can bring. The proposed algorithm in R-code involves the use of probabilities with empirical distributions and fitting histograms of data measured by Likert scales. Two case studies with simulated datasets having peculiar characteristics and a real case illustrate the advantages of the Composition of Probabilistic Preferences.","PeriodicalId":21933,"journal":{"name":"Standards","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/standards3030020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to demonstrate the advantages of the Composition of Probabilistic Preferences method in multicriteria problems with data from Likert scales. Multicriteria decision aids require a database as a decision matrix, in which two or more alternatives are evaluated according to two or more variables selected as decision criteria. Several problems of this nature use measures by Likert scales. Depending on the method, parameters from these data (e.g., means, modes or medians) are required for calculations. This parameterization of data in ordinal scales has fueled controversy for decades between authors who favor mathematical/statistical rigor and argue against the procedure, stating that ordinal scales should not be parameterized, and scientists from other areas who have shown gains from the process that compensates for this relaxation. The Composition of Probabilistic Preferences can allay the protests raised and obtain more accurate results than descriptive statistics or parametric models can bring. The proposed algorithm in R-code involves the use of probabilities with empirical distributions and fitting histograms of data measured by Likert scales. Two case studies with simulated datasets having peculiar characteristics and a real case illustrate the advantages of the Composition of Probabilistic Preferences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用李克特量表测量变量并用经验分布拟合的多准则问题中概率偏好的组成
本文的目的是展示概率偏好组合方法在李克特尺度数据的多准则问题中的优势。多标准决策辅助需要一个数据库作为决策矩阵,其中两个或多个备选方案根据作为决策标准选择的两个或多个变量进行评估。这种性质的几个问题使用李克特量表进行测量。根据方法的不同,计算需要这些数据中的参数(例如,平均值、模态或中位数)。这种有序尺度的数据参数化引发了几十年来的争论,一些作者赞成数学/统计的严谨性,而另一些人反对这一过程,他们认为有序尺度不应该被参数化,而其他领域的科学家已经从这一过程中获益,弥补了这种放松。概率偏好的构成可以缓解提出的抗议,并获得比描述性统计或参数化模型更准确的结果。在R-code中提出的算法涉及使用概率与经验分布和拟合直方图的数据测量李克特量表。两个具有特殊特征的模拟数据集的案例研究和一个真实案例说明了概率偏好组合的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards Life Cycle Assessment for the Environmental Evaluation of District Heating and Cooling: A Critical Review Towards The Development of a Governance System for Central Purchasing Body Collaboration and Performance Benefit–Risk Assessment in Sport and Recreation: Historical Development and Review of AS ISO 4980:2023 Seasonal Data Cleaning for Sales with Chase Demand Strategy Are Stakeholders’ Opinions Redundant?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1