APPLICATION OF DECISION TREE AND RELATIVE PROXIMITY TO EVALUATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CAPACITIES OF LISTED ELECTRIC POWER COMPANIES

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Business Economics and Management Pub Date : 2022-07-15 DOI:10.3846/jbem.2022.17186
Hao Mou, Xiaobo Tang, Hexuan Gao, Yalan Liu
{"title":"APPLICATION OF DECISION TREE AND RELATIVE PROXIMITY TO EVALUATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CAPACITIES OF LISTED ELECTRIC POWER COMPANIES","authors":"Hao Mou, Xiaobo Tang, Hexuan Gao, Yalan Liu","doi":"10.3846/jbem.2022.17186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a complex market environment with fierce competition, maintaining their current market positions is an important issue for electric power companies. Sustainable development not only requires them to pay attention to their current operating efficiencies but also to actively participate in environmental and social responsibilities to maintain their competitive advantages. This paper proposes a model for evaluating the sustainable development capacities of power companies. Firstly, the preliminary evaluation indicator system is constructed with the seven dimensions of production safety, public relations and social welfare, shareholder rights protection, environmental sustainability, employee rights protection, scientific research innovation ability, and financial status. Then, specific financial indicators are selected by CART to avoid indicator redundancies and the final evaluation indicator system is constructed. Finally, the relative proximity calculated by the TOPSIS method is applied to evaluate the sustainable development capacities. An empirical study of 18 listed electric power companies is conducted to verify the evaluation model. The results show that the performances of these companies in production safety and environmental sustainability are generally satisfactory, but the overall performances in public relations and social welfare, employee rights protection, and scientific research innovation ability are relatively poor, so these dimensions should be strengthened.","PeriodicalId":47594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Economics and Management","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.17186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In a complex market environment with fierce competition, maintaining their current market positions is an important issue for electric power companies. Sustainable development not only requires them to pay attention to their current operating efficiencies but also to actively participate in environmental and social responsibilities to maintain their competitive advantages. This paper proposes a model for evaluating the sustainable development capacities of power companies. Firstly, the preliminary evaluation indicator system is constructed with the seven dimensions of production safety, public relations and social welfare, shareholder rights protection, environmental sustainability, employee rights protection, scientific research innovation ability, and financial status. Then, specific financial indicators are selected by CART to avoid indicator redundancies and the final evaluation indicator system is constructed. Finally, the relative proximity calculated by the TOPSIS method is applied to evaluate the sustainable development capacities. An empirical study of 18 listed electric power companies is conducted to verify the evaluation model. The results show that the performances of these companies in production safety and environmental sustainability are generally satisfactory, but the overall performances in public relations and social welfare, employee rights protection, and scientific research innovation ability are relatively poor, so these dimensions should be strengthened.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
决策树和相对接近度在电力上市公司可持续发展能力评价中的应用
在竞争激烈的复杂市场环境中,如何保持现有的市场地位是电力企业面临的重要问题。可持续发展不仅需要企业关注当前的经营效率,还需要企业积极承担环境和社会责任,以保持竞争优势。本文提出了电力公司可持续发展能力评价模型。首先,构建了安全生产、公共关系与社会福利、股东权益保护、环境可持续性、员工权益保护、科研创新能力、财务状况七个维度的初步评价指标体系。然后通过CART选择具体的财务指标,避免指标冗余,构建最终的评价指标体系。最后,将TOPSIS方法计算的相对接近度应用于可持续发展能力评价。通过对18家电力上市公司的实证研究,对评价模型进行了验证。结果表明,这些企业在安全生产和环境可持续性方面的绩效总体较好,但在公共关系与社会福利、员工权益保护和科研创新能力方面的整体绩效较差,需要加强这些维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
48
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Economics and Management is a peer-reviewed journal which publishes original research papers. The objective of the journal is to provide insights into business and strategic management issues through the publication of high quality research from around the world. We particularly focus on research undertaken in Western Europe but welcome perspectives from other regions of the world that enhance our knowledge in this area. The journal publishes in the following areas of research: Global Business Transition Issues Economic Growth and Development Economics of Organizations and Industries Finance and Investment Strategic Management Marketing Innovations Public Administration.
期刊最新文献
BUSINESS RECOVERY AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS: EVIDENCE FROM VISEGRAD COUNTRIES AND SERBIA VARIETY OF SHOPPING MODES: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK, PIVOTAL FACTORS, AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS THE EFFECTS OF INTERNATIONAL LOGISTICS IN GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN TRADE INNOVATION, COOPETITION AND SPILLOVER EFFECTS IN EUROPEAN REGIONS EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE PROFILES AND INTERGENERATIONAL COLLABORATION IN BUSINESS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1