Moderasi ‘di atas’ Tekstualisme-Kontekstualisme: Metodologi Pemahaman Sunnah Yusuf al-Qaradhawi

Sansan Ziaul Haq, Asep Salahudin
{"title":"Moderasi ‘di atas’ Tekstualisme-Kontekstualisme: Metodologi Pemahaman Sunnah Yusuf al-Qaradhawi","authors":"Sansan Ziaul Haq, Asep Salahudin","doi":"10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The discourse of understanding the Sunnah of the Prophet — as in the interpretation of the Qur'an — in this contemporary era is faced with a dilemmatic choice between following the global trend or settling for the 'purity' of the islamic teachings. Responding to this problem, some groups approach the textual approach that is oriented to the practice of Islam in the style of al-salaf al-salih strictly, while others advocate the contextualization of Islamic sources creatively according to the dynamics of the times. This paper will specifically discuss the manhaj offered by Yusuf al-Qaradhawi in synthesizing the two approaches in the context of understanding the Sunnah. Through interpretive analysis methods, this article finds that the methodology of understanding the Sunnah initiated by al-Qaradhawi on the one hand is moderate because it seeks to mediate the two 'excessive' sides of the textual and contextual approaches, and at the same time is comprehensive because linking the demand of interpreting the Sunnah to the broader methodological principles.","PeriodicalId":52891,"journal":{"name":"Al Quds Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Quds Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

. The discourse of understanding the Sunnah of the Prophet — as in the interpretation of the Qur'an — in this contemporary era is faced with a dilemmatic choice between following the global trend or settling for the 'purity' of the islamic teachings. Responding to this problem, some groups approach the textual approach that is oriented to the practice of Islam in the style of al-salaf al-salih strictly, while others advocate the contextualization of Islamic sources creatively according to the dynamics of the times. This paper will specifically discuss the manhaj offered by Yusuf al-Qaradhawi in synthesizing the two approaches in the context of understanding the Sunnah. Through interpretive analysis methods, this article finds that the methodology of understanding the Sunnah initiated by al-Qaradhawi on the one hand is moderate because it seeks to mediate the two 'excessive' sides of the textual and contextual approaches, and at the same time is comprehensive because linking the demand of interpreting the Sunnah to the broader methodological principles.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代的上下文主义:理解Sunnah Yusuf al-Qaradhawi的方法
。理解先知圣训的话语——就像解释《古兰经》一样——在这个当代面临着一个两难的选择,是跟随全球趋势还是满足于伊斯兰教义的“纯洁性”。针对这一问题,一些团体采用严格的《salaf al-salih》风格的文本方法,这种方法以伊斯兰教的实践为导向,而另一些团体则主张根据时代的动态创造性地将伊斯兰教源语境化。本文将在理解圣训的背景下综合这两种方法,具体讨论优素福·卡拉达维提出的曼哈伊。通过解释分析方法,本文发现,卡拉达维发起的理解圣训的方法论一方面是温和的,因为它试图调解文本和上下文方法的两个“过度”方面,同时是全面的,因为将解释圣训的需求与更广泛的方法论原则联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Konsep Historis Al-Qur’an dalam Pandangan John Wansbrough: Sebuah Tinjauan worldview Islam Hedonic Treadmill Analysis According to Hamka's Perspective in Tafsir Al-Azhar Peningkatan Kecerdasan Anak Usia Dini Melalui Pembelajaran Integratif Sains dan Al-Qur’an Konsep Pengendalian Inflasi dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an Implementasi Teori Hadis Maudū’ dalam Menilai Kredibilitas Portal Berita: Analisis pada Portal Media Tirto.id
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1