Effect of composite thickness over the fiber post on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia Pub Date : 2020-06-04 DOI:10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.11
Kasra Rahimipour, N. Panahandeh, S. Sheikh-Al-Eslamian, R. Mousavi, H. Torabzadeh
{"title":"Effect of composite thickness over the fiber post on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth","authors":"Kasra Rahimipour, N. Panahandeh, S. Sheikh-Al-Eslamian, R. Mousavi, H. Torabzadeh","doi":"10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aimed to assess the effect of composite thickness over the fiber post on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. \nMethods: This in vitro, experimental study was performed on 50 sound human premolars, which were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=10). Teeth in Group 1 remained intact while other specimens underwent root canal treatment with a Mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity preparation, restored with fiber posts with a distance of 1.5 mm to the occlusal surface in groups 2 and 4 and 0.5 mm in groups 3 and 5. 24 hours of incubation was applied for groups 1-3 and 1 year of incubation for groups 4 and 5. Thereafter fracture strength measured using a Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. Data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Two-Way ANOVA and Tukey HSD. \nResults: The results showed a significant difference in terms of fracture resistance (P 0.05). Also, Tukey HSD revealed no statistically significant differences between Group 1 and 4 at one year. However, Group 1 (1255.25±280.61N) exhibited significantly higher fracture resistance than that of Group 5 (855.72±300.20N) at one year (P=0.027). The difference between other groups was not significant at any time point (P>0.05). \nConclusions: By covering the fiber post with 1.5 mm thickness of composite resin and cuspal reduction of 2 mm, the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth can be increased to the level of sound teeth.","PeriodicalId":42221,"journal":{"name":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32067/GIE.2020.34.01.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess the effect of composite thickness over the fiber post on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was performed on 50 sound human premolars, which were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=10). Teeth in Group 1 remained intact while other specimens underwent root canal treatment with a Mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity preparation, restored with fiber posts with a distance of 1.5 mm to the occlusal surface in groups 2 and 4 and 0.5 mm in groups 3 and 5. 24 hours of incubation was applied for groups 1-3 and 1 year of incubation for groups 4 and 5. Thereafter fracture strength measured using a Universal Testing Machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. Data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Two-Way ANOVA and Tukey HSD. Results: The results showed a significant difference in terms of fracture resistance (P 0.05). Also, Tukey HSD revealed no statistically significant differences between Group 1 and 4 at one year. However, Group 1 (1255.25±280.61N) exhibited significantly higher fracture resistance than that of Group 5 (855.72±300.20N) at one year (P=0.027). The difference between other groups was not significant at any time point (P>0.05). Conclusions: By covering the fiber post with 1.5 mm thickness of composite resin and cuspal reduction of 2 mm, the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth can be increased to the level of sound teeth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维桩复合厚度对根管治疗后牙齿抗折性的影响
目的:研究纤维桩复合厚度对根管治疗后牙齿抗折性的影响。方法:选取50颗健康的人前磨牙进行体外实验研究,随机分为5组(n=10)。第1组牙齿保持完整,其余标本采用中牙合远端(meseo -occluso-distal, MOD)空腔制备根管治疗,第2、4组和第3、5组分别用距咬合面1.5 mm和0.5 mm的纤维桩修复。1 ~ 3组孵育24小时,4、5组孵育1年。然后用万能试验机以1毫米/分钟的十字速度测量断裂强度。采用Shapiro-Wilk、双向方差分析和Tukey HSD对数据进行分析。结果:两组在抗骨折性方面差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。此外,Tukey HSD在1年组1和4之间没有统计学上的显著差异。组1(1255.25±280.61N)的抗骨折能力明显高于组5(855.72±300.20N) (P=0.027)。各组间各时间点差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在纤维桩上覆盖1.5 mm厚度的复合树脂,牙尖复位2mm,可使根管治疗牙的抗折能力提高到健全牙的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia
Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Giornale Italiano di Endodonzia was founded in 1987 and is the official journal of the Italian Society of Endodontics (SIE). It is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on clinical research and/or clinical methodology, case reports related to Endodontics. The Journal evaluates also contributes in restorative dentistry, dental traumatology, experimental pathophysiology, pharmacology and microbiology dealing with Endodontics.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy of Depotphoresis and diode laser for reduction of microbial load and postoperative pain, and healing of periapical lesions: a randomized clinical trial Endodontics: clinical protocols on scientific basis Anatomical proximity of upper teeth and local factors associated with the thickness of the maxillary sinus membrane: a retrospective study A contemporary approach to treat necrotic immature teeth using different bioceramic materials Endodontic guides and ultrasonic tips for management of calcifications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1