Masaaki Kotera, T. Bayashi, M. Hattori, T. Tokimatsu, S. Goto, H. Mihara, M. Kanehisa
{"title":"Comprehensive genomic analysis of sulfur-relay pathway genes.","authors":"Masaaki Kotera, T. Bayashi, M. Hattori, T. Tokimatsu, S. Goto, H. Mihara, M. Kanehisa","doi":"10.1142/9781848166585_0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many cofactors and nucleotides containing sulfur atoms are known to have important functions in a variety of organisms. Recently, the biosynthetic pathways of these sulfur containing compounds have been revealed, where many enzymes relay sulfur atoms. Increasing evidence also suggests that the prokaryotic sulfur-relay enzymes might be the evolutionary origin of ubiquitination and the related systems that control a wide range of physiological processes in eukaryotic cells. However, these sulfur-relay enzymes have been studied in only a small number of organisms. Here we carried out comparative genomic analysis and examined the presence and absence of sulfurtransferases utilized in the biosynthetic pathways of molybdenum cofactor (Moco), 2-thiouridine (S(2)U), and 4-thiouridine (S(4)U), and IscS, a cysteine desulfurase. We found that all eukaryotes and many other organisms lack the intermediate enzymes in S(2)U biosynthesis. It is also found that most genes lack rhodanese homology domain (RHD), a catalytic domain of sulfurtransferase. Some organisms have a conserved sequence composed of about 100 residues in the C terminus of TusA, different from RHD. Host-associated organisms have a tendency to lose Moco biosynthetic enzymes, and some organisms have MoaD-MoaE fusion protein. Our findings suggest that sulfur-relay pathways have been so diversified that some putative sulfurtransferases possibly function in other unknown pathways.","PeriodicalId":73143,"journal":{"name":"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics","volume":"9 1","pages":"104-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome informatics. International Conference on Genome Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9781848166585_0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15
Abstract
Many cofactors and nucleotides containing sulfur atoms are known to have important functions in a variety of organisms. Recently, the biosynthetic pathways of these sulfur containing compounds have been revealed, where many enzymes relay sulfur atoms. Increasing evidence also suggests that the prokaryotic sulfur-relay enzymes might be the evolutionary origin of ubiquitination and the related systems that control a wide range of physiological processes in eukaryotic cells. However, these sulfur-relay enzymes have been studied in only a small number of organisms. Here we carried out comparative genomic analysis and examined the presence and absence of sulfurtransferases utilized in the biosynthetic pathways of molybdenum cofactor (Moco), 2-thiouridine (S(2)U), and 4-thiouridine (S(4)U), and IscS, a cysteine desulfurase. We found that all eukaryotes and many other organisms lack the intermediate enzymes in S(2)U biosynthesis. It is also found that most genes lack rhodanese homology domain (RHD), a catalytic domain of sulfurtransferase. Some organisms have a conserved sequence composed of about 100 residues in the C terminus of TusA, different from RHD. Host-associated organisms have a tendency to lose Moco biosynthetic enzymes, and some organisms have MoaD-MoaE fusion protein. Our findings suggest that sulfur-relay pathways have been so diversified that some putative sulfurtransferases possibly function in other unknown pathways.